Review Literature as Topic
"Review Literature as Topic" is a descriptor in the National Library of Medicine's controlled vocabulary thesaurus,
MeSH (Medical Subject Headings). Descriptors are arranged in a hierarchical structure,
which enables searching at various levels of specificity.
Works about published materials which provide an examination of recent or current literature. These articles can cover a wide range of subject matter at various levels of completeness and comprehensiveness based on analyses of literature that may include research findings. The review may reflect the state of the art and may also include reviews as a literary form.
| Descriptor ID |
D012196
|
| MeSH Number(s) |
L01.178.682.759
|
| Concept/Terms |
State-of-the-Art Review- State-of-the-Art Review
- State of the Art Review
- State-of-the-Art Reviews
- Review, State-of-the-Art
- Reviews, State-of-the-Art
- State of the Art Reviews
|
Below are MeSH descriptors whose meaning is more general than "Review Literature as Topic".
Below are MeSH descriptors whose meaning is more specific than "Review Literature as Topic".
This graph shows the total number of publications written about "Review Literature as Topic" by people in this website by year, and whether "Review Literature as Topic" was a major or minor topic of these publications.
To see the data from this visualization as text,
click here.
| Year | Major Topic | Minor Topic | Total |
|---|
| 2006 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| 2008 | 1 | 1 | 2 |
| 2011 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| 2012 | 1 | 1 | 2 |
| 2013 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| 2014 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| 2016 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| 2017 | 2 | 0 | 2 |
| 2018 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
To return to the timeline,
click here.
Below are the most recent publications written about "Review Literature as Topic" by people in Profiles.
-
Sources of Funding for Research in Evidence Reviews That Inform Recommendations of the US Preventive Services Task Force. JAMA. 2018 05 22; 319(20):2132-2133.
-
Estimating data from figures with a Web-based program: Considerations for a systematic review. Res Synth Methods. 2017 Sep; 8(3):258-262.
-
An approach to addressing subpopulation considerations in systematic reviews: the experience of reviewers supporting the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force. Syst Rev. 2017 03 02; 6(1):41.
-
Developing a New Definition and Assessing New Clinical Criteria for Septic Shock: For the Third International Consensus Definitions for Sepsis and Septic Shock (Sepsis-3). JAMA. 2016 Feb 23; 315(8):775-87.
-
Behavioral Counseling Interventions Expert Forum: Overview and Primer on U.S. Preventive Services Task Force Methods. Am J Prev Med. 2015 Sep; 49(3 Suppl 2):S129-37.
-
A taxonomy of rapid reviews links report types and methods to specific decision-making contexts. J Clin Epidemiol. 2015 Dec; 68(12):1451-62.e3.
-
Integration of existing systematic reviews into new reviews: identification of guidance needs. Syst Rev. 2014 Jun 23; 3:60.
-
Clinical and organizational factors in the initial evaluation of patients with lung cancer: Diagnosis and management of lung cancer, 3rd ed: American College of Chest Physicians evidence-based clinical practice guidelines. Chest. 2013 May; 143(5 Suppl):e121S-e141S.
-
From well-being to positive mental health: conceptualization and qualitative development of an instrument in Singapore. Qual Life Res. 2012 Dec; 21(10):1785-94.
-
Writing a clinically appraised topic is a team sport. Acad Radiol. 2012 Jul; 19(7):777-8.