Douglas  Corley  to  Adenoma
                            
                            
                                This is a "connection" page, showing publications  Douglas  Corley  has written about  Adenoma.
                            
                            
                            
                                
                                    
                                            
    
        
        
        
            Connection Strength
            
                
            
            9.506
         
        
        
     
 
    
        
        - 
            Surveillance Colonoscopy Findings in Older Adults With a History of Colorectal Adenomas. JAMA Netw Open. 2024 Apr 01; 7(4):e244611.
            
            
                Score: 0.819
            
         
        
        - 
            Evaluating Different Approaches for Calculating Adenoma Detection Rate: Is Screening Colonoscopy the Gold Standard? Gastroenterology. 2023 09; 165(3):784-787.e4.
            
            
                Score: 0.773
            
         
        
        - 
            Physician Adenoma Detection Rates and Colorectal Cancer-Reply. JAMA. 2022 10 11; 328(14):1462-1463.
            
            
                Score: 0.740
            
         
        
        - 
            Developing Meaningful Health Care Quality Metrics: An Example From Colonoscopy and Adenoma Detection. Ann Intern Med. 2022 10; 175(10):1479-1480.
            
            
                Score: 0.738
            
         
        
        - 
            Association of Physician Adenoma Detection Rates With Postcolonoscopy Colorectal Cancer. JAMA. 2022 06 07; 327(21):2114-2122.
            
            
                Score: 0.722
            
         
        
        - 
            Long-term Risk of Colorectal Cancer and Related Death After Adenoma Removal in a Large, Community-based Population. Gastroenterology. 2020 03; 158(4):884-894.e5.
            
            
                Score: 0.600
            
         
        
        - 
            Effect of Sex, Age, and Positivity Threshold on Fecal Immunochemical Test Accuracy: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. Gastroenterology. 2019 12; 157(6):1494-1505.
            
            
                Score: 0.595
            
         
        
        - 
            Index colonoscopy-related risk factors for postcolonoscopy colorectal cancers. Gastrointest Endosc. 2019 01; 89(1):168-176.e3.
            
            
                Score: 0.556
            
         
        
        - 
            Primary care visit use after positive fecal immunochemical test for colorectal cancer screening. Cancer. 2017 Oct 01; 123(19):3744-3753.
            
            
                Score: 0.512
            
         
        
        - 
            Endoscopist fatigue estimates and colonoscopic adenoma detection in a large community-based setting. Gastrointest Endosc. 2017 Mar; 85(3):601-610.e2.
            
            
                Score: 0.487
            
         
        
        - 
            Factors influencing variation in physician adenoma detection rates: a theory-based approach for performance improvement. Gastrointest Endosc. 2016 Mar; 83(3):617-26.e2.
            
            
                Score: 0.453
            
         
        
        - 
            Adjusting for patient demographics has minimal effects on rates of adenoma detection in a large, community-based setting. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2015 Apr; 13(4):739-46.
            
            
                Score: 0.426
            
         
        
        - 
            Adenoma detection rate and risk of colorectal cancer and death. N Engl J Med. 2014 06 26; 370(26):2541.
            
            
                Score: 0.416
            
         
        
        - 
            Adenoma detection rate and risk of colorectal cancer and death. N Engl J Med. 2014 Apr 03; 370(14):1298-306.
            
            
                Score: 0.410
            
         
        
        - 
            Variation of adenoma prevalence by age, sex, race, and colon location in a large population: implications for screening and quality programs. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2013 Feb; 11(2):172-80.
            
            
                Score: 0.368
            
         
        
        - 
            Can we improve adenoma detection rates? A systematic review of intervention studies. Gastrointest Endosc. 2011 Sep; 74(3):656-65.
            
            
                Score: 0.339
            
         
        
        - 
            Impact of adenoma detection on the benefit of faecal testing vs. colonoscopy for colorectal cancer. Int J Cancer. 2017 12 01; 141(11):2359-2367.
            
            
                Score: 0.130
            
         
        
        - 
            Diagnosis and predictors of sessile serrated adenoma after educational training in a large, community-based, integrated healthcare setting. Gastrointest Endosc. 2018 Mar; 87(3):755-765.e1.
            
            
                Score: 0.130
            
         
        
        - 
            Metformin use and risk of colorectal adenoma after polypectomy in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2015 Nov; 24(11):1692-8.
            
            
                Score: 0.113
            
         
        
        - 
            Variation in Adenoma Detection Rate and the Lifetime Benefits and Cost of Colorectal Cancer Screening: A Microsimulation Model. JAMA. 2015 Jun 16; 313(23):2349-58.
            
            
                Score: 0.111
            
         
        
        - 
            Colorectal Cancer Screening in People With and Without HIV in an Integrated Health Care Setting. . 2019 07 01; 81(3):284-291.
            
            
                Score: 0.037
            
         
        
        - 
            Fecal Immunochemical Test Program Performance Over 4 Rounds of Annual Screening: A Retrospective Cohort Study. Ann Intern Med. 2016 Apr 05; 164(7):456-63.
            
            
                Score: 0.029