Co-Authors
This is a "connection" page, showing publications co-authored by Douglas Corley and Jessica Chubak.
Connection Strength
3.947
-
Incidence of serious complications following screening colonoscopy in adults aged 76 to 85 years old. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2024 Nov 25.
Score: 0.249
-
Predicting Risk of Colorectal Cancer After Adenoma Removal in a Large Community-Based Setting. Am J Gastroenterol. 2024 Apr 11.
Score: 0.239
-
Surveillance Colonoscopy Findings in Older Adults With a History of Colorectal Adenomas. JAMA Netw Open. 2024 Apr 01; 7(4):e244611.
Score: 0.238
-
Risk of colorectal cancer and colorectal cancer mortality beginning one year after a negative fecal occult blood test, among screen-eligible 76-85-year-olds. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2023 Jul 14.
Score: 0.227
-
Evaluating Different Approaches for Calculating Adenoma Detection Rate: Is Screening Colonoscopy the Gold Standard? Gastroenterology. 2023 09; 165(3):784-787.e4.
Score: 0.225
-
Test performance metrics for breast, cervical, colon and lung cancer screening: a systematic review. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2023 Feb 08.
Score: 0.220
-
Risk of Colorectal Cancer and Colorectal Cancer Mortality Beginning Ten Years after a Negative Colonoscopy, among Screen-Eligible Adults 76 to 85 Years Old. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2023 01 09; 32(1):37-45.
Score: 0.219
-
Informative Presence in Electronic Health Record Data: A Challenge in Implementing Study Exclusion Criteria. Epidemiology. 2023 Jan 01; 34(1):29-32.
Score: 0.214
-
Estimating Cancer Screening Sensitivity and Specificity Using Healthcare Utilization Data: Defining the Accuracy Assessment Interval. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2022 08 02; 31(8):1517-1520.
Score: 0.212
-
Association of Physician Adenoma Detection Rates With Postcolonoscopy Colorectal Cancer. JAMA. 2022 06 07; 327(21):2114-2122.
Score: 0.210
-
Primary Care Provider Beliefs and Recommendations About Colorectal Cancer Screening in Four Healthcare Systems. Cancer Prev Res (Phila). 2020 11; 13(11):947-958.
Score: 0.184
-
ANALYSES OF PREVENTIVE CARE MEASURES WITH INCOMPLETE HISTORICAL DATA IN ELECTRONIC MEDICAL RECORDS: AN EXAMPLE FROM COLORECTAL CANCER SCREENING. Ann Appl Stat. 2020 Jun; 14(2):1030-1044.
Score: 0.184
-
Long-term Risk of Colorectal Cancer and Related Death After Adenoma Removal in a Large, Community-based Population. Gastroenterology. 2020 03; 158(4):884-894.e5.
Score: 0.174
-
Receipt of Colonoscopy Following Diagnosis of Advanced Adenomas: An Analysis within Integrated Healthcare Delivery Systems. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2019 Jan; 28(1):91-98.
Score: 0.164
-
Influence of Varying Quantitative Fecal Immunochemical Test Positivity Thresholds on Colorectal Cancer Detection: A Community-Based Cohort Study. Ann Intern Med. 2018 Oct 02; 169(7):439-447.
Score: 0.162
-
Time to Colonoscopy after Positive Fecal Blood Test in Four U.S. Health Care Systems. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2016 Feb; 25(2):344-50.
Score: 0.135
-
Association between racial residential segregation and screening uptake for colorectal and cervical cancer among Black and White patients in five US health care systems. Cancer. 2024 Aug 09.
Score: 0.061
-
Provider- and Facility-Level Variation in Pre-Cancerous Cervical Biopsy Diagnoses. J Low Genit Tract Dis. 2023 Jan 17.
Score: 0.055
-
Evaluation of Harms Reporting in U.S. Cancer Screening Guidelines. Ann Intern Med. 2022 11; 175(11):1582-1590.
Score: 0.054
-
Gaps in the screening process for women diagnosed with cervical cancer in four diverse US health care settings. Cancer Med. 2023 Feb; 12(3):3705-3717.
Score: 0.054
-
Evaluating and Improving Cancer Screening Process Quality in a Multilevel Context: The PROSPR II Consortium Design and Research Agenda. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2022 08 02; 31(8):1521-1531.
Score: 0.053
-
Evaluating Screening Participation, Follow-up, and Outcomes for Breast, Cervical, and Colorectal Cancer in the PROSPR Consortium. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2020 03 01; 112(3):238-246.
Score: 0.045
-
Colonoscopy Indication Algorithm Performance Across Diverse Health Care Systems in the PROSPR Consortium. EGEMS (Wash DC). 2019 Aug 02; 7(1):37.
Score: 0.043
-
Treatment patterns and survival differ between early-onset and late-onset colorectal cancer patients: the patient outcomes to advance learning network. Cancer Causes Control. 2019 Jul; 30(7):747-755.
Score: 0.042
-
Time to Follow-up After Colorectal Cancer Screening by Health Insurance Type. Am J Prev Med. 2019 May; 56(5):e143-e152.
Score: 0.042
-
Cervical cancer screening research in the PROSPR I consortium: Rationale, methods and baseline findings from a US cohort. Int J Cancer. 2019 Mar 15; 144(6):1460-1473.
Score: 0.041
-
Patterns and predictors of repeat fecal immunochemical and occult blood test screening in four large health care systems in the United States. Am J Gastroenterol. 2018 May; 113(5):746-754.
Score: 0.039
-
Influence of Age and Comorbidity on Colorectal Cancer Screening in the Elderly. Am J Prev Med. 2016 09; 51(3):e67-75.
Score: 0.035
-
Association Between Primary Care Visits and Colorectal Cancer Screening Outcomes in the Era of Population Health Outreach. J Gen Intern Med. 2016 10; 31(10):1190-7.
Score: 0.035
-
Racial/Ethnic Disparities in Colorectal Cancer Screening Across Healthcare Systems. Am J Prev Med. 2016 10; 51(4):e107-15.
Score: 0.034
-
The colorectal cancer screening process in community settings: a conceptual model for the population-based research optimizing screening through personalized regimens consortium. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2014 Jul; 23(7):1147-58.
Score: 0.030
-
Screening colonoscopy and risk for incident late-stage colorectal cancer diagnosis in average-risk adults: a nested case-control study. Ann Intern Med. 2013 Mar 05; 158(5 Pt 1):312-20.
Score: 0.028