Header Logo

Connection

Heidi Nelson to United States

Back to Details
This is a "connection" page, showing publications Heidi Nelson has written about United States.
Heidi Nelson
Connection Strength
2.212
United States
  1. Quality of Cancer Recurrence Data in the National Cancer Database: A Reappraisal of Reporting Readiness. Ann Surg Oncol. 2025 Mar; 32(3):1553-1564.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.127
  2. ASO Visual Abstract: National Cancer Database Conforms with Standardized Framework for Registry and Data Quality. Ann Surg Oncol. 2024 Sep; 31(9):5589-5590.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.124
  3. ASO Author Reflections: The Commission on Cancer's Role in Quality Procedures that Govern the National Cancer Database. Ann Surg Oncol. 2024 Sep; 31(9):5585-5586.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.122
  4. The National Cancer Database Conforms to the Standardized Framework for Registry and Data Quality. Ann Surg Oncol. 2024 Sep; 31(9):5546-5559.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.122
  5. Renovating the Commission on Cancer's Quality Measure Portfolio. Ann Surg. 2024 Aug 01; 280(2):193-198.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.121
  6. Associations of Unintended Pregnancy With Maternal and Infant Health Outcomes: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. JAMA. 2022 11 01; 328(17):1714-1729.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.109
  7. American College of Surgeons Efforts in Support of Value-Based Metrics. JAMA Oncol. 2021 02 01; 7(2):307-308.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.097
  8. NASA-Task Load Index Differentiates Surgical Approach: Opportunities for Improvement in Colon and Rectal Surgery. Ann Surg. 2020 05; 271(5):906-912.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.092
  9. NASA-TLX Assessment of Surgeon Workload Variation Across Specialties. Ann Surg. 2020 04; 271(4):686-692.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.091
  10. Achieving Health Equity in Preventive Services: A Systematic Review for a National Institutes of Health Pathways to Prevention Workshop. Ann Intern Med. 2020 02 18; 172(4):258-271.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.090
  11. Response to Comment on "NASATLX Assessment of Surgeon Workload Variation Across Specialties". Ann Surg. 2019 12; 270(6):e86-e87.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.089
  12. Incident Cases Captured in the National Cancer Database Compared with Those in U.S. Population Based Central Cancer Registries in 2012-2014. Ann Surg Oncol. 2019 Jun; 26(6):1604-1612.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.084
  13. Suicide Risk Assessment and Prevention: A Systematic Review Focusing on Veterans. Psychiatr Serv. 2017 Oct 01; 68(10):1003-1015.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.075
  14. Screening for Syphilis: Updated Evidence Report and Systematic Review for the US Preventive Services Task Force. JAMA. 2016 Jun 07; 315(21):2328-37.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.070
  15. Factors Associated With Rates of False-Positive and False-Negative Results From Digital Mammography Screening: An Analysis of Registry Data. Ann Intern Med. 2016 Feb 16; 164(4):226-35.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.068
  16. Mammography Screening in a Large Health System Following the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force Recommendations and the Affordable Care Act. PLoS One. 2015; 10(6):e0131903.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.066
  17. Surgical quality surrogates do not predict colon cancer survival in the setting of technical credentialing: a report from the prospective COST trial. Ann Surg. 2013 Jan; 257(1):102-7.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.055
  18. Risk factors for breast cancer for women aged 40 to 49 years: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Ann Intern Med. 2012 May 01; 156(9):635-48.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.053
  19. First National Effort to Optimize the Performance of Cancer Surgery by the American College of Surgeons Commission on Cancer and Cancer Surgery Standards Program: Early Results After Implementation of the Operative Standards. Ann Surg. 2025 Sep 01; 282(3):371-381.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.033
  20. Cancer Survivorship Care in the United States at Facilities Accredited by the Commission on Cancer. JAMA Netw Open. 2024 Jul 01; 7(7):e2418736.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.031
  21. Survival outcomes used to validate version 9 of the American Joint Committee on Cancer staging system for appendiceal cancer. CA Cancer J Clin. 2023 Nov-Dec; 73(6):590-596.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.029
  22. Survival outcomes used to generate version 9 American Joint Committee on Cancer staging system for anal cancer. CA Cancer J Clin. 2023 Sep-Oct; 73(5):516-523.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.028
  23. Screening for postmenopausal osteoporosis: a review of the evidence for the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force. Ann Intern Med. 2002 Sep 17; 137(6):529-41.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.027
  24. Developing the American College of Surgeons Quality Improvement Framework to Evaluate Local Surgical Improvement Efforts. JAMA Surg. 2022 08 01; 157(8):737-739.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.027
  25. Postmenopausal estrogen replacement and risk for venous thromboembolism: a systematic review and meta-analysis for the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force. Ann Intern Med. 2002 May 07; 136(9):680-90.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.026
  26. Trends in Patient Volume by Hospital Type and the Association of These Trends With Time to Cancer Treatment Initiation. JAMA Netw Open. 2021 07 01; 4(7):e2115675.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.025
  27. Survival After Cancer Treatment at Top-Ranked US Cancer Hospitals vs Affiliates of Top-Ranked Cancer Hospitals. JAMA Netw Open. 2020 05 01; 3(5):e203942.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.023
  28. Women's Preventive Services Initiative's Well-Woman Chart: A Summary of Preventive Health Recommendations for Women. Obstet Gynecol. 2019 09; 134(3):465-469.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.022
  29. Short interpregnancy intervals and adverse perinatal outcomes in high-resource settings: An updated systematic review. Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol. 2019 01; 33(1):O25-O47.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.021
  30. Report of the Office of Population Affairs' expert work group meeting on short birth spacing and adverse pregnancy outcomes: Methodological quality of existing studies and future directions for research. Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol. 2019 01; 33(1):O5-O14.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.021
  31. Malpractice Concerns, Defensive Medicine, and the Histopathology Diagnosis of Melanocytic Skin Lesions. Am J Clin Pathol. 2018 Aug 30; 150(4):338-345.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.020
  32. Characteristics and diagnostic performance of pathologists who enjoy interpreting melanocytic lesions. Dermatol Online J. 2018 Jun 15; 24(6).
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.020
  33. Concordance and Reproducibility of Melanoma Staging According to the 7th vs 8th Edition of the AJCC Cancer Staging Manual. JAMA Netw Open. 2018 05; 1(1).
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.020
  34. Second opinion strategies in breast pathology: a decision analysis addressing over-treatment, under-treatment, and care costs. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2018 01; 167(1):195-203.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.019
  35. Pathologists' diagnosis of invasive melanoma and melanocytic proliferations: observer accuracy and reproducibility study. BMJ. 2017 Jun 28; 357:j2813.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.019
  36. Outcomes of Primary Colorectal Sarcoma: A National Cancer Data Base (NCDB) Review. J Gastrointest Surg. 2017 03; 21(3):560-568.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.018
  37. Diagnostic Reproducibility: What Happens When the Same Pathologist Interprets the Same Breast Biopsy Specimen at Two Points in Time? Ann Surg Oncol. 2017 May; 24(5):1234-1241.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.018
  38. The influence of tumor regression, solar elastosis, and patient age on pathologists' interpretation of melanocytic skin lesions. Lab Invest. 2017 02; 97(2):187-193.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.018
  39. Trends in breast biopsy pathology diagnoses among women undergoing mammography in the United States: a report from the Breast Cancer Surveillance Consortium. Cancer. 2015 May 01; 121(9):1369-78.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.016
  40. Digitized whole slides for breast pathology interpretation: current practices and perceptions. J Digit Imaging. 2014 Oct; 27(5):642-8.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.016
  41. Second opinion in breast pathology: policy, practice and perception. J Clin Pathol. 2014 Nov; 67(11):955-60.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.015
  42. Tipping the balance of benefits and harms to favor screening mammography starting at age 40 years: a comparative modeling study of risk. Ann Intern Med. 2012 May 01; 156(9):609-17.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.013
  43. Cancer registries: a novel alternative to long-term clinical trial follow-up based on results of a comparative study. Clin Trials. 2010 Dec; 7(6):686-95.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.012
  44. USPSTF recommendations for STI screening. Am Fam Physician. 2008 Mar 15; 77(6):819-24.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.010
  45. Use of the National Cancer Data Base to develop clinical trials accrual targets that are appropriate for minority ethnicity patients: a report from the American College of Surgeons Oncology Group (ACOSOG) Special Population Committee. Cancer. 2006 Jan 01; 106(1):188-95.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.009

© 2025 Kaiser Permanente

Your Privacy Choices