Heidi Nelson to Observer Variation
This is a "connection" page, showing publications Heidi Nelson has written about Observer Variation.
Connection Strength
0.494
-
Diagnostic concordance among pathologists interpreting breast biopsy specimens. JAMA. 2015 Mar 17; 313(11):1122-32.
Score: 0.129
-
Accuracy of Digital Pathologic Analysis vs Traditional Microscopy in the Interpretation of Melanocytic Lesions. JAMA Dermatol. 2018 10 01; 154(10):1159-1166.
Score: 0.041
-
Pathologist characteristics associated with accuracy and reproducibility of melanocytic skin lesion interpretation. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2018 Jul; 79(1):52-59.e5.
Score: 0.040
-
Pathologists' diagnosis of invasive melanoma and melanocytic proliferations: observer accuracy and reproducibility study. BMJ. 2017 Jun 28; 357:j2813.
Score: 0.038
-
The diagnostic challenge of low-grade ductal carcinoma in situ. Eur J Cancer. 2017 07; 80:39-47.
Score: 0.038
-
Surgical implications and variability in the use of the flat epithelial atypia diagnosis on breast biopsy specimens. Breast. 2017 Aug; 34:34-43.
Score: 0.037
-
Characteristics associated with requests by pathologists for second opinions on breast biopsies. J Clin Pathol. 2017 Nov; 70(11):947-953.
Score: 0.037
-
Diagnostic Reproducibility: What Happens When the Same Pathologist Interprets the Same Breast Biopsy Specimen at Two Points in Time? Ann Surg Oncol. 2017 May; 24(5):1234-1241.
Score: 0.036
-
Evaluation of 12 strategies for obtaining second opinions to improve interpretation of breast histopathology: simulation study. BMJ. 2016 Jun 22; 353:i3069.
Score: 0.035
-
Use of Digital Whole Slide Imaging in Dermatopathology. J Digit Imaging. 2016 Apr; 29(2):243-53.
Score: 0.035
-
Development of a diagnostic test set to assess agreement in breast pathology: practical application of the Guidelines for Reporting Reliability and Agreement Studies (GRRAS). BMC Womens Health. 2013 Feb 05; 13:3.
Score: 0.028