Header Logo

Connection

Heidi Nelson to Registries

This is a "connection" page, showing publications Heidi Nelson has written about Registries.
Connection Strength

2.648
  1. ASO Visual Abstract: National Cancer Database Conforms with Standardized Framework for Registry and Data Quality. Ann Surg Oncol. 2024 Sep; 31(9):5589-5590.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.830
  2. The National Cancer Database Conforms to the Standardized Framework for Registry and Data Quality. Ann Surg Oncol. 2024 Sep; 31(9):5546-5559.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.815
  3. Incident Cases Captured in the National Cancer Database Compared with Those in U.S. Population Based Central Cancer Registries in 2012-2014. Ann Surg Oncol. 2019 Jun; 26(6):1604-1612.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.567
  4. Twenty-Five Years of Cancer Follow-Up; Is the Data Worth the Effort? Ann Surg Oncol. 2022 Feb; 29(2):828-836.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.171
  5. Factors Associated With Rates of False-Positive and False-Negative Results From Digital Mammography Screening: An Analysis of Registry Data. Ann Intern Med. 2016 Feb 16; 164(4):226-35.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.114
  6. Cancer registries: a novel alternative to long-term clinical trial follow-up based on results of a comparative study. Clin Trials. 2010 Dec; 7(6):686-95.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.079
  7. Outcomes of Primary Colorectal Sarcoma: A National Cancer Data Base (NCDB) Review. J Gastrointest Surg. 2017 03; 21(3):560-568.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.031
  8. A framework for evaluating diagnostic discordance in pathology discovered during research studies. Arch Pathol Lab Med. 2014 Jul; 138(7):955-61.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.026
  9. Is en-bloc resection of locally recurrent rectal carcinoma involving the urinary tract indicated? Ann Surg Oncol. 2006 May; 13(5):740-4.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.014

© 2024 Kaiser Permanente