Header Logo

Connection

Carmit McMullen to Humans

Back to Details
This is a "connection" page, showing publications Carmit McMullen has written about Humans.
Carmit McMullen
Connection Strength
1.308
Humans
  1. Engaging Patient Advisory Committees to Inform a Genomic Cancer Risk Study: Lessons for Future Efforts. Perm J. 2022 06 29; 26(2):28-39.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.059
  2. The effect of multiple recruitment contacts on response rates and patterns of missing data in a survey of bladder cancer survivors 6 months after cystectomy. Qual Life Res. 2020 Apr; 29(4):879-889.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.050
  3. Barriers to eliciting patient goals and values in shared decision-making breast cancer surgery consultations: An ethnographic and interview study. Psychooncology. 2019 11; 28(11):2233-2239.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.049
  4. Decision Regret Related to Urinary Diversion Choice among Patients Treated with Cystectomy. J Urol. 2020 01; 203(1):159-163.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.049
  5. Clinical Use Cases for a Tool to Assess Risk in Superficial Bladder Cancer. Perm J. 2019; 23.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.049
  6. Health care improvement and survivorship priorities of colorectal cancer survivors: findings from the PORTAL colorectal cancer cohort survey. Support Care Cancer. 2019 Jan; 27(1):147-156.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.045
  7. Designing for impact: identifying stakeholder-driven interventions to support recovery after major cancer surgery. Support Care Cancer. 2018 Dec; 26(12):4067-4076.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.045
  8. Caregiving and mutuality among long-term colorectal cancer survivors with ostomies: qualitative study. Support Care Cancer. 2018 02; 26(2):529-537.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.042
  9. Participation in Activities Associated With Quality of Life for Long-Term Survivors of Rectal Cancer. Perm J. 2017; 21:16-011.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.041
  10. Greatest Challenges of Rectal Cancer Survivors: Results of a Population-Based Survey. Dis Colon Rectum. 2016 Nov; 59(11):1019-1027.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.040
  11. "Is It Worth Knowing?" Focus Group Participants' Perceived Utility of Genomic Preconception Carrier Screening. J Genet Couns. 2016 Feb; 25(1):135-45.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.037
  12. Effect of computerized prescriber order entry on pharmacy: experience of one health system. Am J Health Syst Pharm. 2015 Jan 15; 72(2):133-42.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.035
  13. Patient-centered priorities for improving medication management and adherence. Patient Educ Couns. 2015 Jan; 98(1):102-10.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.035
  14. Caregivers as healthcare managers: health management activities, needs, and caregiving relationships for colorectal cancer survivors with ostomies. Support Care Cancer. 2014 Sep; 22(9):2401-8.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.034
  15. Cultivating engaged leadership through a learning collaborative: lessons from primary care renewal in Oregon safety net clinics. Ann Fam Med. 2013 May-Jun; 11 Suppl 1:S34-40.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.031
  16. Untreated peristomal skin complications among long-term colorectal cancer survivors with ostomies. Clin J Oncol Nurs. 2011 Dec; 15(6):644-50.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.029
  17. Rapid assessment of clinical information systems in the healthcare setting: an efficient method for time-pressed evaluation. Methods Inf Med. 2011; 50(4):299-307.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.027
  18. Making diabetes self-management education culturally relevant for Filipino Americans in Hawaii. Diabetes Educ. 2008 Sep-Oct; 34(5):841-53.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.023
  19. The greatest challenges reported by long-term colorectal cancer survivors with stomas. J Support Oncol. 2008 Apr; 6(4):175-82.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.022
  20. Distributed cognition: an alternative model of cognition for medical informatics. Int J Med Inform. 2008 Apr; 77(4):226-34.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.021
  21. Self-rated health appraisal as cultural and identity process: African American elders' health and evaluative rationales. Gerontologist. 2006 Aug; 46(4):431-8.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.020
  22. Orienting frames and private routines: the role of cultural process in critical care safety. Int J Med Inform. 2007 Jun; 76 Suppl 1:S129-35.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.020
  23. Comparing the clinical and cost-effectiveness of remote (telehealth and online) cognitive behavioral therapy-based treatments for high-impact chronic pain relative to usual care: study protocol for the RESOLVE multisite randomized control trial. Trials. 2023 Mar 16; 24(1):196.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.016
  24. The Cancer Financial Experience (CAFÉ) study: randomized controlled trial of a financial navigation intervention to address cancer-related financial hardship. Trials. 2022 May 13; 23(1):402.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.015
  25. Effect of Clinical Decision Support at Community Health Centers on the Risk of Cardiovascular Disease: A Cluster Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA Netw Open. 2022 02 01; 5(2):e2146519.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.014
  26. A decision aid for additional findings in genomic sequencing: Development and pilot testing. Patient Educ Couns. 2021 05; 104(5):960-968.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.013
  27. Association between metabolic syndrome and recurrence of nonmuscle-invasive bladder cancer in older adults. Urol Oncol. 2020 09; 38(9):737.e17-737.e23.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.013
  28. Integrating stakeholder feedback in translational genomics research: an ethnographic analysis of a study protocol's evolution. Genet Med. 2020 06; 22(6):1094-1101.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.013
  29. External validation of the EORTC and NCCN bladder cancer recurrence and progression risk calculators in a U.S. community-based health system. Urol Oncol. 2020 02; 38(2):39.e21-39.e27.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.012
  30. Satisfaction with Primary Care Providers and Health Care Services Among Patients with Chronic Pain: a Mixed-Methods Study. J Gen Intern Med. 2020 01; 35(1):190-197.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.012
  31. Taking opioids in times of crisis: Institutional oversight, chronic pain and suffering in an integrated healthcare delivery system in the U.S. Int J Drug Policy. 2019 12; 74:62-68.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.012
  32. Protocol for a Noninferiority Comparative Effectiveness Trial of Home-Based Palliative Care (HomePal). J Palliat Med. 2019 09; 22(S1):20-33.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.012
  33. Financial burden and quality of life among early-onset colorectal cancer survivors: A qualitative analysis. Health Expect. 2019 10; 22(5):1050-1057.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.012
  34. Treatment patterns and survival differ between early-onset and late-onset colorectal cancer patients: the patient outcomes to advance learning network. Cancer Causes Control. 2019 Jul; 30(7):747-755.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.012
  35. Ongoing ostomy self-care challenges of long-term rectal cancer survivors. Support Care Cancer. 2018 Nov; 26(11):3933-3939.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.011
  36. Lessons Learned From A Study Of Genomics-Based Carrier Screening For Reproductive Decision Making. Health Aff (Millwood). 2018 05; 37(5):809-816.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.011
  37. Rectal Cancer Survivors' Participation in Productive Activities. Perm J. 2018; 22:17-022.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.011
  38. Patient perspectives on the use of categories of conditions for decision making about genomic carrier screening results. Am J Med Genet A. 2018 02; 176(2):376-385.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.011
  39. Predictors of Bowel Function in Long-term Rectal Cancer Survivors with Anastomosis. Ann Surg Oncol. 2017 Nov; 24(12):3596-3603.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.011
  40. Physical activity, bowel function, and quality of life among rectal cancer survivors. Qual Life Res. 2017 11; 26(11):3131-3142.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.011
  41. Reasons for Declining Preconception Expanded Carrier Screening Using Genome Sequencing. J Genet Couns. 2017 Oct; 26(5):971-979.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.010
  42. Optimizing patient-reported outcome and risk factor reporting from cancer survivors: a randomized trial of four different survey methods among colorectal cancer survivors. J Cancer Surviv. 2017 Jun; 11(3):393-400.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.010
  43. User-Centered Design for Developing Interventions to Improve Clinician Recommendation of Human Papillomavirus Vaccination. Perm J. 2017; 21:16-191.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.010
  44. Design of a randomized controlled trial for genomic carrier screening in healthy patients seeking preconception genetic testing. Contemp Clin Trials. 2017 02; 53:100-105.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.010
  45. Sexual Function and Health-Related Quality of Life in Long-Term Rectal Cancer Survivors. J Sex Med. 2016 07; 13(7):1071-9.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.010
  46. Conversations for providers caring for patients with rectal cancer: Comparison of long-term patient-centered outcomes for patients with low rectal cancer facing ostomy or sphincter-sparing surgery. CA Cancer J Clin. 2016 09; 66(5):387-97.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.010
  47. Generating a taxonomy for genetic conditions relevant to reproductive planning. Am J Med Genet A. 2016 Mar; 170(3):565-73.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.010
  48. Patients' ratings of genetic conditions validate a taxonomy to simplify decisions about preconception carrier screening via genome sequencing. Am J Med Genet A. 2016 Mar; 170(3):574-82.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.010
  49. Lessons learned from implementing service-oriented clinical decision support at four sites: A qualitative study. Int J Med Inform. 2015 Nov; 84(11):901-11.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.009
  50. Dietary and Behavioral Adjustments to Manage Bowel Dysfunction After Surgery in Long-Term Colorectal Cancer Survivors. Ann Surg Oncol. 2015 Dec; 22(13):4317-24.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.009
  51. Multiple perspectives on clinical decision support: a qualitative study of fifteen clinical and vendor organizations. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2015 Apr 24; 15:35.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.009
  52. Ethnographic process evaluation in primary care: explaining the complexity of implementation. BMC Health Serv Res. 2014 Dec 05; 14:607.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.009
  53. Reliability and validity of a survey to measure bowel function and quality of life in long-term rectal cancer survivors. Qual Life Res. 2014 Dec; 23(10):2831-40.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.008
  54. "I didn't feel like I was a person anymore": realigning full adult personhood after ostomy surgery. Med Anthropol Q. 2014 Jun; 28(2):242-59.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.008
  55. From diagnosis through survivorship: health-care experiences of colorectal cancer survivors with ostomies. Support Care Cancer. 2014 Jun; 22(6):1563-70.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.008
  56. You and me and the computer makes three: variations in exam room use of the electronic health record. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2014 Feb; 21(e1):e147-51.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.008
  57. A qualitative study of the activities performed by people involved in clinical decision support: recommended practices for success. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2014 May-Jun; 21(3):464-72.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.008
  58. Spiritual well-being in long-term colorectal cancer survivors with ostomies. Psychooncology. 2013 Nov; 22(11):2513-21.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.008
  59. Context matters: the experience of 14 research teams in systematically reporting contextual factors important for practice change. Ann Fam Med. 2013 May-Jun; 11 Suppl 1:S115-23.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.008
  60. Surviving colorectal cancer: long-term, persistent ostomy-specific concerns and adaptations. J Wound Ostomy Continence Nurs. 2013 Jan-Feb; 40(1):61-72.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.008
  61. Changes in body mass index and stoma related problems in the elderly. J Geriatr Oncol. 2013 Jan; 4(1):84-9.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.008
  62. Irrigation practices in long-term survivors of colorectal cancer with colostomies. Clin J Oncol Nurs. 2012 Oct; 16(5):514-9.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.008
  63. Standard practices for computerized clinical decision support in community hospitals: a national survey. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2012 Nov-Dec; 19(6):980-7.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.007
  64. Recommended practices for computerized clinical decision support and knowledge management in community settings: a qualitative study. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2012 Feb 14; 12:6.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.007
  65. Gender differences in quality of life among long-term colorectal cancer survivors with ostomies. Oncol Nurs Forum. 2011 Sep; 38(5):587-96.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.007
  66. Clinical decision support in small community practice settings: a case study. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2011 Nov-Dec; 18(6):879-82.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.007
  67. Development and evaluation of a comprehensive clinical decision support taxonomy: comparison of front-end tools in commercial and internally developed electronic health record systems. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2011 May 01; 18(3):232-42.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.007
  68. Complications among colorectal cancer survivors: SF-6D preference-weighted quality of life scores. Med Care. 2011 Mar; 49(3):321-6.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.007
  69. Governance for clinical decision support: case studies and recommended practices from leading institutions. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2011 Mar-Apr; 18(2):187-94.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.007
  70. Multiple perspectives on the meaning of clinical decision support. AMIA Annu Symp Proc. 2010 Nov 13; 2010:672-6.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.007
  71. Multiple perspectives on the meaning of clinical decision support. AMIA Annu Symp Proc. 2010 Nov 13; 2010:1427-31.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.007
  72. Identifying best practices for clinical decision support and knowledge management in the field. Stud Health Technol Inform. 2010; 160(Pt 2):806-10.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.006
  73. Figuring out sex in a reconfigured body: experiences of female colorectal cancer survivors with ostomies. Women Health. 2009 Dec; 49(8):608-24.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.006
  74. Health-related quality of life among long-term rectal cancer survivors with an ostomy: manifestations by sex. J Clin Oncol. 2009 Oct 01; 27(28):4664-70.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.006
  75. Gender differences in sleep disruption and fatigue on quality of life among persons with ostomies. J Clin Sleep Med. 2009 Aug 15; 5(4):335-43.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.006
  76. How the ICU follows orders: care delivery as a complex activity system. AMIA Annu Symp Proc. 2003; 284-8.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.004

© 2024 Kaiser Permanente