Susan Shortreed to Research Design
This is a "connection" page, showing publications Susan Shortreed has written about Research Design.
Connection Strength
2.792
-
Empirical evaluation of internal validation methods for prediction in large-scale clinical data with rare-event outcomes: a case study in suicide risk prediction. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2023 02 01; 23(1):33.
Score: 0.721
-
Using predictive analytics to improve pragmatic trial design. Clin Trials. 2020 08; 17(4):394-401.
Score: 0.590
-
A case study of SMART attributes: a qualitative assessment of generalizability, retention rate, and trial quality. Trials. 2016 May 14; 17(1):242.
Score: 0.452
-
Exploring the "active ingredients" of an online smoking intervention: a randomized factorial trial. Nicotine Tob Res. 2014 Aug; 16(8):1129-39.
Score: 0.391
-
Zelen design clinical trials: why, when, and how. Trials. 2021 Aug 17; 22(1):541.
Score: 0.163
-
Principles and procedures for data and safety monitoring in pragmatic clinical trials. Trials. 2019 Dec 09; 20(1):690.
Score: 0.145
-
Who benefits from CBT for insomnia in primary care? Important patient selection and trial design lessons from longitudinal results of the Lifestyles trial. Sleep. 2014 Feb 01; 37(2):299-308.
Score: 0.097
-
The effect of program design on engagement with an internet-based smoking intervention: randomized factorial trial. J Med Internet Res. 2013 Mar 25; 15(3):e69.
Score: 0.091
-
Inside the black box: starting to uncover the underlying decision rules used in a one-by-one expert assessment of occupational exposure in case-control studies. Occup Environ Med. 2013 Mar; 70(3):203-10.
Score: 0.089
-
Population-based outreach versus care as usual to prevent suicide attempt: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial. Trials. 2016 09 15; 17(1):452.
Score: 0.029
-
Using hierarchical cluster models to systematically identify groups of jobs with similar occupational questionnaire response patterns to assist rule-based expert exposure assessment in population-based studies. Ann Occup Hyg. 2015 May; 59(4):455-66.
Score: 0.026