Header Logo

Connection

James Ralston to Middle Aged

Back to Details
This is a "connection" page, showing publications James Ralston has written about Middle Aged.
James Ralston
Connection Strength
0.974
Middle Aged
  1. Understanding What Is Most Important to Individuals with Multiple Chronic Conditions: A Qualitative Study of Patients' Perspectives. J Gen Intern Med. 2017 Dec; 32(12):1278-1284.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.062
  2. An exploration of the potential reach of smartphones in diabetes. AMIA Annu Symp Proc. 2014; 2014:289-96.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.051
  3. Home blood pressure monitoring, secure electronic messaging and medication intensification for improving hypertension control: a mediation analysis. Appl Clin Inform. 2014; 5(1):232-48.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.049
  4. Glycemic control associated with secure patient-provider messaging within a shared electronic medical record: a longitudinal analysis. Diabetes Care. 2013 Sep; 36(9):2726-33.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.046
  5. Use of web-based shared medical records among patients with HIV. Am J Manag Care. 2013 Apr 01; 19(4):e114-24.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.046
  6. Communication about diabetes risk factors during between-visit encounters. Am J Manag Care. 2012 Dec; 18(12):807-15.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.045
  7. Patient race/ethnicity and shared medical record use among diabetes patients. Med Care. 2012 May; 50(5):434-40.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.043
  8. Diabetes quality of care and outpatient utilization associated with electronic patient-provider messaging: a cross-sectional analysis. Diabetes Care. 2009 Jul; 32(7):1182-7.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.035
  9. Patient use of secure electronic messaging within a shared medical record: a cross-sectional study. J Gen Intern Med. 2009 Mar; 24(3):349-55.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.034
  10. Patient web services integrated with a shared medical record: patient use and satisfaction. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2007 Nov-Dec; 14(6):798-806.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.031
  11. Variation in adoption rates of a patient web portal with a shared medical record by age, gender, and morbidity level. AMIA Annu Symp Proc. 2006; 871.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.028
  12. Patients' experience with a diabetes support programme based on an interactive electronic medical record: qualitative study. BMJ. 2004 May 15; 328(7449):1159.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.025
  13. Knowledge of cervical cancer risk factors among Chinese immigrants in Seattle. J Community Health. 2003 Feb; 28(1):41-57.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.023
  14. The FamilyTalk randomized controlled trial: patient-reported outcomes in clinical genetic sequencing for colorectal cancer. Cancer Causes Control. 2021 May; 32(5):483-492.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.020
  15. Rates of Actionable Genetic Findings in Individuals with Colorectal Cancer or Polyps Ascertained from a Community Medical Setting. Am J Hum Genet. 2019 09 05; 105(3):526-533.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.018
  16. "It's Not Just Technology, It's People": Constructing a Conceptual Model of Shared Health Informatics for Tracking in Chronic Illness Management. J Med Internet Res. 2019 04 29; 21(4):e10830.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.018
  17. HIV Provider Documentation and Actions Following Patient Reports of At-risk Behaviors and Conditions When Identified by a Web-Based Point-of-Care Assessment. AIDS Behav. 2017 Nov; 21(11):3111-3121.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.016
  18. Online patient websites for electronic health record access among vulnerable populations: portals to nowhere? J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2017 Apr 01; 24(e1):e47-e54.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.015
  19. Integrating the patient portal into the health management work ecosystem: user acceptance of a novel prototype. AMIA Annu Symp Proc. 2016; 2016:541-550.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.015
  20. Health Outcomes of Population-Based Pharmacy Outreach to Increase Statin Use for Prevention of Cardiovascular Disease in Patients with Diabetes. J Manag Care Spec Pharm. 2016 Aug; 22(8):909-17.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.014
  21. Acceptability of a team-based mobile health (mHealth) application for lifestyle self-management in individuals with chronic illnesses. Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc. 2016 08; 2016:3277-3281.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.014
  22. Genetic variation among 82 pharmacogenes: The PGRNseq data from the eMERGE network. Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2016 08; 100(2):160-9.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.014
  23. When doctors share visit notes with patients: a study of patient and doctor perceptions of documentation errors, safety opportunities and the patient-doctor relationship. BMJ Qual Saf. 2017 04; 26(4):262-270.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.014
  24. Association of Arrhythmia-Related Genetic Variants With Phenotypes Documented in Electronic Medical Records. JAMA. 2016 Jan 05; 315(1):47-57.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.014
  25. Do Patients Who Access Clinical Information on Patient Internet Portals Have More Primary Care Visits? Med Care. 2016 Jan; 54(1):17-23.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.014
  26. Barriers and Facilitators to Online Portal Use Among Patients and Caregivers in a Safety Net Health Care System: A Qualitative Study. J Med Internet Res. 2015 Dec 03; 17(12):e275.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.014
  27. Refilling medications through an online patient portal: consistent improvements in adherence across racial/ethnic groups. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2016 Apr; 23(e1):e28-33.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.014
  28. Antiretroviral Therapy Adherence and Use of an Electronic Shared Medical Record Among People Living with HIV. AIDS Behav. 2015 Jun; 19 Suppl 2:177-85.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.013
  29. "Getting off the Bus Closer to Your Destination": Patients' Views about Pharmacogenetic Testing. Perm J. 2015; 19(3):21-7.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.013
  30. Engineering for reliability in at-home chronic disease management. AMIA Annu Symp Proc. 2014; 2014:777-86.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.013
  31. Patients who share transparent visit notes with others: characteristics, risks, and benefits. J Med Internet Res. 2014 Nov 12; 16(11):e247.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.013
  32. Hemoglobin A1c, comorbid conditions and all-cause mortality in older patients with diabetes: a retrospective 9-year cohort study. Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 2014 Nov; 106(2):373-82.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.013
  33. Design and anticipated outcomes of the eMERGE-PGx project: a multicenter pilot for preemptive pharmacogenomics in electronic health record systems. Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2014 Oct; 96(4):482-9.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.013
  34. Patient Access to Online Visit Notes: Perceptions of Doctors and Patients at an Urban HIV/AIDS Clinic. J Int Assoc Provid AIDS Care. 2015 Jul-Aug; 14(4):306-12.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.012
  35. Online access to doctors' notes: patient concerns about privacy. J Med Internet Res. 2013 Sep 26; 15(9):e208.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.012
  36. Patient-provider communication and trust in relation to use of an online patient portal among diabetes patients: The Diabetes and Aging Study. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2013 Nov-Dec; 20(6):1128-31.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.012
  37. Development and evaluation of CAHPS questions to assess the impact of health information technology on patient experiences with ambulatory care. Med Care. 2012 Nov; 50 Suppl:S11-9.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.011
  38. Inviting patients to read their doctors' notes: a quasi-experimental study and a look ahead. Ann Intern Med. 2012 Oct 02; 157(7):461-70.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.011
  39. Does a large-scale organizational transformation toward patient-centered access change the utilization and costs of care for patients with diabetes? Med Care Res Rev. 2012 Oct; 69(5):519-39.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.011
  40. Evaluating the impact of patients' online access to doctors' visit notes: designing and executing the OpenNotes project. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2012 Apr 13; 12:32.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.011
  41. Inviting patients to read their doctors' notes: patients and doctors look ahead: patient and physician surveys. Ann Intern Med. 2011 Dec 20; 155(12):811-9.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.011
  42. Accuracy of blood pressure measurements reported in an electronic medical record during routine primary care visits. J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich). 2011 Nov; 13(11):821-8.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.010
  43. Randomized trial of depression follow-up care by online messaging. J Gen Intern Med. 2011 Jul; 26(7):698-704.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.010
  44. Patient ability and willingness to participate in a web-based intervention to improve hypertension control. J Med Internet Res. 2011 Jan 20; 13(1):e1.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.010
  45. Web-based collaborative care for type 1 diabetes: a pilot randomized trial. Diabetes Technol Ther. 2009 Apr; 11(4):211-7.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.009
  46. Effectiveness of home blood pressure monitoring, Web communication, and pharmacist care on hypertension control: a randomized controlled trial. JAMA. 2008 Jun 25; 299(24):2857-67.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.008
  47. Designing mobile dietary management support technologies for people with diabetes. J Telemed Telecare. 2008; 14(7):329-32.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.008
  48. Electronic communications and home blood pressure monitoring (e-BP) study: design, delivery, and evaluation framework. Contemp Clin Trials. 2008 May; 29(3):376-95.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.008
  49. Using an Internet comanagement module to improve the quality of chronic disease care. Jt Comm J Qual Saf. 2003 Sep; 29(9):443-51.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.006
  50. Clinical experience with piperacetazine in hospitalized mental patients. A four year study. J Indiana State Med Assoc. 1970 Nov; 63(11):1291-6.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.002
  51. [Change of scleral rigidity during tonography (author's transl)]. Klin Monbl Augenheilkd. 1973 Jul; 163(1):38-43.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.001

© 2025 Kaiser Permanente