Header Logo

Connection

James Ralston to Internet

This is a "connection" page, showing publications James Ralston has written about Internet.
Connection Strength

3.256
  1. Use of web-based shared medical records among patients with HIV. Am J Manag Care. 2013 Apr 01; 19(4):e114-24.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.377
  2. Patient race/ethnicity and shared medical record use among diabetes patients. Med Care. 2012 May; 50(5):434-40.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.354
  3. Qualitative evaluation of a mobile phone and web-based collaborative care intervention for patients with type 2 diabetes. Diabetes Technol Ther. 2011 May; 13(5):563-9.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.328
  4. Web-based collaborative care for type 2 diabetes: a pilot randomized trial. Diabetes Care. 2009 Feb; 32(2):234-9.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.279
  5. Variation in adoption rates of a patient web portal with a shared medical record by age, gender, and morbidity level. AMIA Annu Symp Proc. 2006; 871.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.228
  6. Patients' experience with a diabetes support programme based on an interactive electronic medical record: qualitative study. BMJ. 2004 May 15; 328(7449):1159.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.204
  7. HIV Provider Documentation and Actions Following Patient Reports of At-risk Behaviors and Conditions When Identified by a Web-Based Point-of-Care Assessment. AIDS Behav. 2017 Nov; 21(11):3111-3121.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.130
  8. Barriers and Facilitators to Online Portal Use Among Patients and Caregivers in a Safety Net Health Care System: A Qualitative Study. J Med Internet Res. 2015 Dec 03; 17(12):e275.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.114
  9. Patient Access to Online Visit Notes: Perceptions of Doctors and Patients at an Urban HIV/AIDS Clinic. J Int Assoc Provid AIDS Care. 2015 Jul-Aug; 14(4):306-12.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.101
  10. Improving BP control through electronic communications: an economic evaluation. Am J Manag Care. 2013 Sep; 19(9):709-16.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.097
  11. Blood pressure 1 year after completion of web-based pharmacist care. JAMA Intern Med. 2013 Jul 08; 173(13):1250-2.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.096
  12. Patient ability and willingness to participate in a web-based intervention to improve hypertension control. J Med Internet Res. 2011 Jan 20; 13(1):e1.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.081
  13. Designing mobile support for glycemic control in patients with diabetes. J Biomed Inform. 2010 Oct; 43(5 Suppl):S37-40.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.079
  14. Use of a shared medical record with secure messaging by older patients with diabetes. Diabetes Care. 2010 Nov; 33(11):2314-9.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.079
  15. Web-based collaborative care for type 1 diabetes: a pilot randomized trial. Diabetes Technol Ther. 2009 Apr; 11(4):211-7.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.072
  16. Adolescent access to online health services: perils and promise. J Adolesc Health. 2009 Mar; 44(3):244-51.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.070
  17. Effectiveness of home blood pressure monitoring, Web communication, and pharmacist care on hypertension control: a randomized controlled trial. JAMA. 2008 Jun 25; 299(24):2857-67.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.068
  18. Designing mobile dietary management support technologies for people with diabetes. J Telemed Telecare. 2008; 14(7):329-32.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.066
  19. Patient web services integrated with a shared medical record: patient use and satisfaction. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2007 Nov-Dec; 14(6):798-806.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.064
  20. Use and satisfaction of a patient Web portal with a shared medical record between patients and providers. AMIA Annu Symp Proc. 2006; 1070.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.057
  21. Using an Internet comanagement module to improve the quality of chronic disease care. Jt Comm J Qual Saf. 2003 Sep; 29(9):443-51.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.049
  22. "It's Not Just Technology, It's People": Constructing a Conceptual Model of Shared Health Informatics for Tracking in Chronic Illness Management. J Med Internet Res. 2019 04 29; 21(4):e10830.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.036
  23. Online patient websites for electronic health record access among vulnerable populations: portals to nowhere? J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2017 Apr 01; 24(e1):e47-e54.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.031
  24. Do Patients Who Access Clinical Information on Patient Internet Portals Have More Primary Care Visits? Med Care. 2016 Jan; 54(1):17-23.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.029
  25. Patients who share transparent visit notes with others: characteristics, risks, and benefits. J Med Internet Res. 2014 Nov 12; 16(11):e247.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.026
  26. Online access to doctors' notes: patient concerns about privacy. J Med Internet Res. 2013 Sep 26; 15(9):e208.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.024
  27. Development and evaluation of CAHPS questions to assess the impact of health information technology on patient experiences with ambulatory care. Med Care. 2012 Nov; 50 Suppl:S11-9.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.023
  28. Inviting patients to read their doctors' notes: a quasi-experimental study and a look ahead. Ann Intern Med. 2012 Oct 02; 157(7):461-70.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.023
  29. Evaluating the impact of patients' online access to doctors' visit notes: designing and executing the OpenNotes project. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2012 Apr 13; 12:32.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.022
  30. Providers' experience with an organizational redesign initiative to promote patient-centered access: a qualitative study. J Gen Intern Med. 2008 Nov; 23(11):1778-83.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.017
  31. Access intervention in an integrated, prepaid group practice: effects on primary care physician productivity. Health Serv Res. 2008 Oct; 43(5 Pt 2):1888-905.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.017
  32. Electronic communications and home blood pressure monitoring (e-BP) study: design, delivery, and evaluation framework. Contemp Clin Trials. 2008 May; 29(3):376-95.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.016

© 2025 Kaiser Permanente