Karen Wernli to Early Detection of Cancer
This is a "connection" page, showing publications Karen Wernli has written about Early Detection of Cancer.
Connection Strength
4.277
-
Understanding Patient and Clinical Stakeholder Perspectives to Improve Adherence to Lung Cancer Screening. Perm J. 2021 Jun 02; 25.
Score: 0.523
-
Trends in screening breast magnetic resonance imaging use among US women, 2006 to 2016. Cancer. 2020 12 15; 126(24):5293-5302.
Score: 0.500
-
Surveillance for second breast cancer events in women with a personal history of breast cancer using breast MRI: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2020 Jun; 181(2):255-268.
Score: 0.484
-
A qualitative study exploring patient motivations for screening for lung cancer. PLoS One. 2018; 13(7):e0196758.
Score: 0.428
-
Change in Breast Cancer Screening Intervals Since the 2009 USPSTF Guideline. J Womens Health (Larchmt). 2017 08; 26(8):820-827.
Score: 0.388
-
Screening for Skin Cancer in Adults: Updated Evidence Report and Systematic Review for the US Preventive Services Task Force. JAMA. 2016 Jul 26; 316(4):436-47.
Score: 0.374
-
Patterns of colorectal cancer screening uptake in newly eligible men and women. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2014 Jul; 23(7):1230-7.
Score: 0.320
-
Patterns of breast magnetic resonance imaging use in community practice. JAMA Intern Med. 2014 Jan; 174(1):125-32.
Score: 0.313
-
Knowledge and Perception of Breast Density, Screening Mammography, and Supplemental Screening: in Search of "Informed". J Gen Intern Med. 2020 06; 35(6):1654-1660.
Score: 0.118
-
Underutilization of Supplemental Magnetic Resonance Imaging Screening Among Patients at High Breast Cancer Risk. J Womens Health (Larchmt). 2018 06; 27(6):748-754.
Score: 0.104
-
Performance Benchmarks for Screening Breast MR Imaging in Community Practice. Radiology. 2017 10; 285(1):44-52.
Score: 0.099
-
A qualitative study exploring why individuals opt out of lung cancer screening. Fam Pract. 2017 04 01; 34(2):239-244.
Score: 0.098
-
The colorectal cancer screening process in community settings: a conceptual model for the population-based research optimizing screening through personalized regimens consortium. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2014 Jul; 23(7):1147-58.
Score: 0.081
-
Use of interactive voice response to improve colorectal cancer screening. Med Care. 2014 Jun; 52(6):496-9.
Score: 0.081
-
Outcomes of screening mammography by frequency, breast density, and postmenopausal hormone therapy. JAMA Intern Med. 2013 May 13; 173(9):807-16.
Score: 0.075
-
Reassessing the Benefits and Harms of Risk-Reducing Medication Considering the Persistent Risk of Breast Cancer Mortality in Estrogen Receptor-Positive Breast Cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2023 Feb 01; 41(4):859-870.
Score: 0.036
-
Women's Breast Cancer Screening Confidence by Screening Modality and Breast Density: A Breast Cancer Surveillance Consortium Survey Study. J Womens Health (Larchmt). 2022 11; 31(11):1547-1556.
Score: 0.036
-
Women's considerations and experiences for breast cancer screening and surveillance during the COVID-19 pandemic in the United States: A focus group study. Prev Med. 2021 10; 151:106542.
Score: 0.033
-
Assessment of a Risk-Based Approach for Triaging Mammography Examinations During Periods of Reduced Capacity. JAMA Netw Open. 2021 03 01; 4(3):e211974.
Score: 0.032
-
Prior breast density awareness, knowledge, and communication in a health system-embedded behavioral intervention trial. Cancer. 2020 04 15; 126(8):1614-1621.
Score: 0.030
-
A web-based personalized risk communication and decision-making tool for women with dense breasts: Design and methods of a randomized controlled trial within an integrated health care system. Contemp Clin Trials. 2017 05; 56:25-33.
Score: 0.024
-
Multilevel factors associated with long-term adherence to screening mammography in older women in the U.S. Prev Med. 2016 08; 89:169-177.
Score: 0.023
-
Disparities in the use of screening magnetic resonance imaging of the breast in community practice by race, ethnicity, and socioeconomic status. Cancer. 2016 Feb 15; 122(4):611-7.
Score: 0.022
-
Mammographic screening interval in relation to tumor characteristics and false-positive risk by race/ethnicity and age. Cancer. 2013 Nov 15; 119(22):3959-67.
Score: 0.019
-
Screening outcomes in older US women undergoing multiple mammograms in community practice: does interval, age, or comorbidity score affect tumor characteristics or false positive rates? J Natl Cancer Inst. 2013 Mar 06; 105(5):334-41.
Score: 0.018
-
The impact of obesity on follow-up after an abnormal screening mammogram. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2012 Feb; 21(2):327-36.
Score: 0.017