Header Logo

Connection

Beverly Green to Humans

Back to Details
This is a "connection" page, showing publications Beverly Green has written about Humans.
Beverly Green
Connection Strength
2.360
Humans
  1. Primary care physician beliefs and practices regarding blood pressure measurement: results from BP-CHECK qualitative interviews. BMC Prim Care. 2023 01 25; 24(1):30.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.062
  2. Blood Pressure Checks for Diagnosing Hypertension: Health Professionals' Knowledge, Beliefs, and Practices. J Am Board Fam Med. 2022 Mar-Apr; 35(2):310-319.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.058
  3. Patients' Reactions to Being Offered Financial Incentives to Increase Colorectal Screening: A Qualitative Analysis. Am J Health Promot. 2021 03; 35(3):421-429.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.054
  4. Challenges in Reaching Medicaid and Medicare Enrollees in a Mailed Fecal Immunochemical Test Program. J Community Health. 2020 10; 45(5):916-921.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.053
  5. Colorectal cancer screening: The costs and benefits of getting to 80% in every community. Cancer. 2020 09 15; 126(18):4110-4113.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.052
  6. Low Rates of Colonoscopy Follow-up After a Positive Fecal Immunochemical Test in a Medicaid Health Plan Delivered Mailed Colorectal Cancer Screening Program. J Prim Care Community Health. 2020 Jan-Dec; 11:2150132720958525.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.050
  7. What Multilevel Interventions Do We Need to Increase the Colorectal Cancer Screening Rate to 80%? Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2021 04; 19(4):633-645.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.050
  8. Financial Incentives to Increase Colorectal Cancer Screening Uptake and Decrease Disparities: A Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA Netw Open. 2019 07 03; 2(7):e196570.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.048
  9. Using a continuum of hybrid effectiveness-implementation studies to put research-tested colorectal screening interventions into practice. Implement Sci. 2019 05 29; 14(1):53.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.048
  10. Implementation successes and challenges in participating in a pragmatic study to improve colon cancer screening: perspectives of health center leaders. Transl Behav Med. 2017 09; 7(3):557-566.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.043
  11. A centralized mailed program with stepped increases of support increases time in compliance with colorectal cancer screening guidelines over 5 years: A randomized trial. Cancer. 2017 Nov 15; 123(22):4472-4480.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.042
  12. Reasons for never and intermittent completion of colorectal cancer screening after receiving multiple rounds of mailed fecal tests. BMC Public Health. 2017 05 30; 17(1):531.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.042
  13. Implementation of a New Kiosk Technology for Blood Pressure Management in a Family Medicine Clinic: from the WWAMI Region Practice and Research Network. J Am Board Fam Med. 2016 Sep-Oct; 29(5):620-9.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.040
  14. Colorectal Cancer Screening Rates Increased after Exposure to the Patient-Centered Medical Home (PCMH). J Am Board Fam Med. 2016 Mar-Apr; 29(2):191-200.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.038
  15. A Successful Multifaceted Trial to Improve Hypertension Control in Primary Care: Why Did it Work? J Gen Intern Med. 2015 Nov; 30(11):1665-72.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.037
  16. Impact of continued mailed fecal tests in the patient-centered medical home: Year 3 of the Systems of Support to Increase Colon Cancer Screening and Follow-Up randomized trial. Cancer. 2016 Jan 15; 122(2):312-21.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.037
  17. Recruiting community health centers into pragmatic research: Findings from STOP CRC. Clin Trials. 2016 Apr; 13(2):214-22.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.037
  18. Relationship between cardiovascular risk and lipid testing in one health care system: a retrospective cohort study. BMC Health Serv Res. 2015 Jul 23; 15:281.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.037
  19. Factors associated with use and non-use of the Fecal Immunochemical Test (FIT) kit for Colorectal Cancer Screening in Response to a 2012 outreach screening program: a survey study. BMC Public Health. 2015 Jun 11; 15:546.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.036
  20. An economic evaluation of colorectal cancer screening in primary care practice. Am J Prev Med. 2015 Jun; 48(6):714-21.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.036
  21. BP here, there, and everywhere--mobile health applications (apps) and hypertension care. J Am Soc Hypertens. 2015 Feb; 9(2):137-9.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.035
  22. Results of nurse navigator follow-up after positive colorectal cancer screening test: a randomized trial. J Am Board Fam Med. 2014 Nov-Dec; 27(6):789-95.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.035
  23. "BeneFITs" to increase colorectal cancer screening in priority populations. JAMA Intern Med. 2014 Aug; 174(8):1242-3.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.034
  24. Longitudinal predictors of colorectal cancer screening among participants in a randomized controlled trial. Prev Med. 2014 Sep; 66:123-30.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.034
  25. Strategies and Opportunities to STOP Colon Cancer in Priority Populations: design of a cluster-randomized pragmatic trial. Contemp Clin Trials. 2014 Jul; 38(2):344-9.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.034
  26. Time to screening in the systems of support to increase colorectal cancer screening trial. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2014 Aug; 23(8):1683-8.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.034
  27. Navigating the murky waters of colorectal cancer screening and health reform. Am J Public Health. 2014 Jun; 104(6):982-6.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.034
  28. e-Care for heart wellness: a feasibility trial to decrease blood pressure and cardiovascular risk. Am J Prev Med. 2014 Apr; 46(4):368-77.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.034
  29. Home blood pressure monitoring, secure electronic messaging and medication intensification for improving hypertension control: a mediation analysis. Appl Clin Inform. 2014; 5(1):232-48.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.033
  30. Advantages of wordless instructions on how to complete a fecal immunochemical test: lessons from patient advisory council members of a federally qualified health center. J Cancer Educ. 2014 Mar; 29(1):86-90.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.033
  31. Strategies and opportunities to STOP colon cancer in priority populations: pragmatic pilot study design and outcomes. BMC Cancer. 2014 Feb 26; 14:55.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.033
  32. Psychological distress after a positive fecal occult blood test result among members of an integrated healthcare delivery system. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2014 Jan; 23(1):154-9.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.033
  33. Uptake and positive predictive value of fecal occult blood tests: A randomized controlled trial. Prev Med. 2013 Nov; 57(5):671-8.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.032
  34. Caring for patients with multiple chronic conditions: balancing evidenced-based and patient-centered care. J Am Board Fam Med. 2013 Sep-Oct; 26(5):484-5.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.032
  35. Improving BP control through electronic communications: an economic evaluation. Am J Manag Care. 2013 Sep; 19(9):709-16.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.032
  36. Blood pressure 1 year after completion of web-based pharmacist care. JAMA Intern Med. 2013 Jul 08; 173(13):1250-2.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.032
  37. Home blood pressure monitoring: take it to the bank. JAMA. 2013 Jul 03; 310(1):40-1.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.032
  38. An automated intervention with stepped increases in support to increase uptake of colorectal cancer screening: a randomized trial. Ann Intern Med. 2013 Mar 05; 158(5 Pt 1):301-11.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.031
  39. Using body mass index data in the electronic health record to calculate cardiovascular risk. Am J Prev Med. 2012 Apr; 42(4):342-7.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.029
  40. Nonparticipation in a population-based trial to increase colorectal cancer screening. Am J Prev Med. 2012 Apr; 42(4):390-7.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.029
  41. The hypertension team: the role of the pharmacist, nurse, and teamwork in hypertension therapy. J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich). 2012 Jan; 14(1):51-65.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.029
  42. Assessing the scale-up of a weight loss program narrowing the gap between research and practice. Am J Prev Med. 2011 Nov; 41(5):548-9.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.028
  43. Accuracy of blood pressure measurements reported in an electronic medical record during routine primary care visits. J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich). 2011 Nov; 13(11):821-8.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.028
  44. Patient ability and willingness to participate in a web-based intervention to improve hypertension control. J Med Internet Res. 2011 Jan 20; 13(1):e1.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.027
  45. Systems of support to increase colorectal cancer screening and follow-up rates (SOS): design, challenges, and baseline characteristics of trial participants. Contemp Clin Trials. 2010 Nov; 31(6):589-603.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.026
  46. Effectiveness of home blood pressure monitoring, Web communication, and pharmacist care on hypertension control: a randomized controlled trial. JAMA. 2008 Jun 25; 299(24):2857-67.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.022
  47. Electronic communications and home blood pressure monitoring (e-BP) study: design, delivery, and evaluation framework. Contemp Clin Trials. 2008 May; 29(3):376-95.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.021
  48. Active for life: a work-based physical activity program. Prev Chronic Dis. 2007 Jul; 4(3):A63.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.021
  49. Breast cancer screening controversies. J Am Board Fam Pract. 2003 May-Jun; 16(3):233-41.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.016
  50. How do minor changes in the definition of blood pressure control affect the reported success of hypertension treatment? Am J Manag Care. 2003 Mar; 9(3):219-24.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.016
  51. Economic Evaluation of Mailed Home-Based Human Papillomavirus Self-sampling Kits for Cervical Cancer Screening. JAMA Netw Open. 2023 03 01; 6(3):e234052.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.016
  52. Risk of Colorectal Cancer and Colorectal Cancer Mortality Beginning Ten Years after a Negative Colonoscopy, among Screen-Eligible Adults 76 to 85 Years Old. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2023 01 09; 32(1):37-45.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.015
  53. Comparing Pharmacist-Led Telehealth Care and Clinic-Based Care for Uncontrolled High Blood Pressure: The Hyperlink 3 Pragmatic Cluster-Randomized Trial. Hypertension. 2022 12; 79(12):2708-2720.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.015
  54. Design of a pragmatic randomized controlled trial of home-based human papillomavirus (HPV) self-sampling for increasing cervical cancer screening uptake in a U.S. healthcare system: The STEP trial. Contemp Clin Trials. 2022 11; 122:106960.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.015
  55. Reach in a pragmatic hypertension trial: A critical RE-AIM component. Contemp Clin Trials. 2022 10; 121:106896.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.015
  56. Comparison of explanatory and pragmatic design choices in a cluster-randomized hypertension trial: effects on enrollment, participant characteristics, and adherence. Trials. 2022 Aug 17; 23(1):673.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.015
  57. Association of an Automated Blood Pressure Measurement Quality Improvement Program With Terminal Digit Preference and Recorded Mean Blood Pressure in 11 Clinics. JAMA Netw Open. 2022 08 01; 5(8):e2229098.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.015
  58. Measured weight loss as a precursor to cancer diagnosis: retrospective cohort analysis of 43 302 primary care patients. J Cachexia Sarcopenia Muscle. 2022 Oct; 13(5):2492-2503.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.015
  59. Effectiveness of telephone support in increasing physical activity levels in primary care patients. Am J Prev Med. 2002 Apr; 22(3):177-83.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.015
  60. Experiences and Perceptions of Patients with Uncontrolled Hypertension Who are Dissatisfied with Their Hypertension Care. J Am Board Fam Med. 2021 Nov-Dec; 34(6):1115-1122.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.014
  61. Protocol for a randomized controlled trial of sitting reduction to improve cardiometabolic health in older adults. Contemp Clin Trials. 2021 12; 111:106593.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.014
  62. Inequities in Hypertension Control in the United States Exposed and Exacerbated by COVID-19 and the Role of Home Blood Pressure and Virtual Health Care During and After the COVID-19 Pandemic. J Am Heart Assoc. 2021 06; 10(11):e020997.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.014
  63. Renin-Angiotensin-Aldosterone System Inhibitors and COVID-19 Infection or Hospitalization: A Cohort Study. Am J Hypertens. 2021 04 20; 34(4):339-347.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.014
  64. Response to "ACE-2 Downregulation and Incidence of Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome-Coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2) Infection". Am J Hypertens. 2021 04 20; 34(4):427.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.014
  65. Factors Influencing Implementation of a Colorectal Cancer Screening Improvement Program in Community Health Centers: an Applied Use of Configurational Comparative Methods. J Gen Intern Med. 2020 11; 35(Suppl 2):815-822.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.013
  66. Evidence and Recommendations on the Use of Telemedicine for the Management of Arterial Hypertension: An International Expert Position Paper. Hypertension. 2020 11; 76(5):1368-1383.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.013
  67. Cardiovascular Events and Costs With Home Blood Pressure Telemonitoring and Pharmacist Management for Uncontrolled Hypertension. Hypertension. 2020 10; 76(4):1097-1103.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.013
  68. Barriers and Facilitators to Timely Colonoscopy Completion for Safety Net Clinic Patients. Am J Health Behav. 2020 07 01; 44(4):460-472.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.013
  69. Mailed fecal immunochemical test outreach for colorectal cancer screening: Summary of a Centers for Disease Control and Prevention-sponsored Summit. CA Cancer J Clin. 2020 07; 70(4):283-298.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.013
  70. Self-monitoring of Blood Pressure in Patients With Hypertension-Related Multi-morbidity: Systematic Review and Individual Patient Data Meta-analysis. Am J Hypertens. 2020 03 13; 33(3):243-251.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.013
  71. First-year implementation of mailed FIT colorectal cancer screening programs in two Medicaid/Medicare health insurance plans: qualitative learnings from health plan quality improvement staff and leaders. BMC Health Serv Res. 2020 Feb 21; 20(1):132.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.013
  72. Prospective Cohort study of Predictors of Follow-Up Diagnostic Colonoscopy from a Pragmatic Trial of FIT Screening. Sci Rep. 2020 02 12; 10(1):2441.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.013
  73. Design of a pragmatic cluster-randomized trial comparing telehealth care and best practice clinic-based care for uncontrolled high blood pressure. Contemp Clin Trials. 2020 05; 92:105939.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.013
  74. Moderators of the effectiveness of an intervention to increase colorectal cancer screening through mailed fecal immunochemical test kits: results from a pragmatic randomized trial. Trials. 2020 Jan 15; 21(1):91.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.013
  75. Direct-to-member mailed colorectal cancer screening outreach for Medicaid and Medicare enrollees: Implementation and effectiveness outcomes from the BeneFIT study. Cancer. 2020 02 01; 126(3):540-548.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.012
  76. Addressing guideline and policy changes during pragmatic clinical trials. Clin Trials. 2019 08; 16(4):431-437.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.012
  77. Predictors of Colorectal Cancer Screening Prior to Implementation of a Large Pragmatic Trial in Federally Qualified Health Centers. J Community Health. 2018 02; 43(1):128-136.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.011
  78. Data Sharing and Embedded Research. Ann Intern Med. 2017 11 07; 167(9):668-670.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.011
  79. Self-monitoring of blood pressure in hypertension: A systematic review and individual patient data meta-analysis. PLoS Med. 2017 Sep; 14(9):e1002389.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.011
  80. Pragmatic clinical trials embedded in healthcare systems: generalizable lessons from the NIH Collaboratory. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2017 Sep 18; 17(1):144.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.011
  81. Pragmatic (trial) informatics: a perspective from the NIH Health Care Systems Research Collaboratory. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2017 09 01; 24(5):996-1001.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.011
  82. Applying the Plan-Do-Study-Act (PDSA) approach to a large pragmatic study involving safety net clinics. BMC Health Serv Res. 2017 06 19; 17(1):411.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.010
  83. Taxonomy for colorectal cancer screening promotion: Lessons from recent randomized controlled trials. Prev Med. 2017 Aug; 101:229-234.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.010
  84. Patient characteristics associated with greater blood pressure control in a randomized trial of home blood pressure telemonitoring and pharmacist management. J Am Soc Hypertens. 2016 11; 10(11):873-880.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.010
  85. The validation of electronic health records in accurately identifying patients eligible for colorectal cancer screening in safety net clinics. Fam Pract. 2016 12; 33(6):639-643.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.010
  86. A substudy evaluating treatment intensification on medication adherence among hypertensive patients receiving home blood pressure telemonitoring and pharmacist management. J Clin Pharm Ther. 2016 Oct; 41(5):493-8.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.010
  87. Follow-Up of Abnormal Breast and Colorectal Cancer Screening by Race/Ethnicity. Am J Prev Med. 2016 10; 51(4):507-12.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.010
  88. Time to Colonoscopy after Positive Fecal Blood Test in Four U.S. Health Care Systems. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2016 Feb; 25(2):344-50.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.010
  89. Individual patient data meta-analysis of self-monitoring of blood pressure (BP-SMART): a protocol. BMJ Open. 2015 Sep 15; 5(9):e008532.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.009
  90. Impact of mHealth chronic disease management on treatment adherence and patient outcomes: a systematic review. J Med Internet Res. 2015 Feb 24; 17(2):e52.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.009
  91. Patterns of colorectal cancer screening uptake in newly eligible men and women. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2014 Jul; 23(7):1230-7.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.008
  92. Effectiveness of team training on fall prevention. J Nurs Care Qual. 2014 Apr-Jun; 29(2):164-73.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.008
  93. Challenges and possible solutions to colorectal cancer screening for the underserved. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2014 Apr; 106(4):dju032.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.008
  94. Transforming preventive medicine science, practice, education, and policy: looking back at the last 20 years of the American Journal of Preventive Medicine. Am J Prev Med. 2013 Dec; 45(6):678-86.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.008
  95. Barriers and facilitators to evidence-based blood pressure control in community practice. J Am Board Fam Med. 2013 Sep-Oct; 26(5):539-57.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.008
  96. Physician-patient colorectal cancer screening discussions by physicians' screening rates. J Am Board Fam Med. 2012 Nov-Dec; 25(6):771-81.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.008
  97. Risk of ovulatory infertility in relation to body weight. Fertil Steril. 1988 Nov; 50(5):721-6.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.006
  98. Reach, engagement, and retention in an Internet-based weight loss program in a multi-site randomized controlled trial. J Med Internet Res. 2007 May 09; 9(2):e11.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.005
  99. Exercise as a risk factor for infertility with ovulatory dysfunction. Am J Public Health. 1986 Dec; 76(12):1432-6.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.005
  100. A randomized trial of strategies to increase chlamydia screening in young women. Prev Med. 2006 Oct; 43(4):343-50.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.005

© 2024 Kaiser Permanente