Header Logo

Connection

Beverly Green to Male

Back to Details
This is a "connection" page, showing publications Beverly Green has written about Male.
Beverly Green
Connection Strength
1.812
Male
  1. Challenges in Reaching Medicaid and Medicare Enrollees in a Mailed Fecal Immunochemical Test Program. J Community Health. 2020 10; 45(5):916-921.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.069
  2. Colorectal cancer screening: The costs and benefits of getting to 80% in every community. Cancer. 2020 09 15; 126(18):4110-4113.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.068
  3. Financial Incentives to Increase Colorectal Cancer Screening Uptake and Decrease Disparities: A Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA Netw Open. 2019 07 03; 2(7):e196570.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.063
  4. A centralized mailed program with stepped increases of support increases time in compliance with colorectal cancer screening guidelines over 5 years: A randomized trial. Cancer. 2017 Nov 15; 123(22):4472-4480.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.055
  5. Reasons for never and intermittent completion of colorectal cancer screening after receiving multiple rounds of mailed fecal tests. BMC Public Health. 2017 05 30; 17(1):531.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.054
  6. Colorectal Cancer Screening Rates Increased after Exposure to the Patient-Centered Medical Home (PCMH). J Am Board Fam Med. 2016 Mar-Apr; 29(2):191-200.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.050
  7. A Successful Multifaceted Trial to Improve Hypertension Control in Primary Care: Why Did it Work? J Gen Intern Med. 2015 Nov; 30(11):1665-72.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.049
  8. Impact of continued mailed fecal tests in the patient-centered medical home: Year 3 of the Systems of Support to Increase Colon Cancer Screening and Follow-Up randomized trial. Cancer. 2016 Jan 15; 122(2):312-21.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.049
  9. Relationship between cardiovascular risk and lipid testing in one health care system: a retrospective cohort study. BMC Health Serv Res. 2015 Jul 23; 15:281.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.048
  10. Factors associated with use and non-use of the Fecal Immunochemical Test (FIT) kit for Colorectal Cancer Screening in Response to a 2012 outreach screening program: a survey study. BMC Public Health. 2015 Jun 11; 15:546.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.048
  11. Results of nurse navigator follow-up after positive colorectal cancer screening test: a randomized trial. J Am Board Fam Med. 2014 Nov-Dec; 27(6):789-95.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.046
  12. "BeneFITs" to increase colorectal cancer screening in priority populations. JAMA Intern Med. 2014 Aug; 174(8):1242-3.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.045
  13. Longitudinal predictors of colorectal cancer screening among participants in a randomized controlled trial. Prev Med. 2014 Sep; 66:123-30.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.044
  14. Strategies and Opportunities to STOP Colon Cancer in Priority Populations: design of a cluster-randomized pragmatic trial. Contemp Clin Trials. 2014 Jul; 38(2):344-9.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.044
  15. Time to screening in the systems of support to increase colorectal cancer screening trial. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2014 Aug; 23(8):1683-8.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.044
  16. e-Care for heart wellness: a feasibility trial to decrease blood pressure and cardiovascular risk. Am J Prev Med. 2014 Apr; 46(4):368-77.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.044
  17. Home blood pressure monitoring, secure electronic messaging and medication intensification for improving hypertension control: a mediation analysis. Appl Clin Inform. 2014; 5(1):232-48.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.044
  18. Advantages of wordless instructions on how to complete a fecal immunochemical test: lessons from patient advisory council members of a federally qualified health center. J Cancer Educ. 2014 Mar; 29(1):86-90.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.043
  19. Strategies and opportunities to STOP colon cancer in priority populations: pragmatic pilot study design and outcomes. BMC Cancer. 2014 Feb 26; 14:55.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.043
  20. Psychological distress after a positive fecal occult blood test result among members of an integrated healthcare delivery system. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2014 Jan; 23(1):154-9.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.043
  21. Uptake and positive predictive value of fecal occult blood tests: A randomized controlled trial. Prev Med. 2013 Nov; 57(5):671-8.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.042
  22. Improving BP control through electronic communications: an economic evaluation. Am J Manag Care. 2013 Sep; 19(9):709-16.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.042
  23. Home blood pressure monitoring: take it to the bank. JAMA. 2013 Jul 03; 310(1):40-1.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.042
  24. An automated intervention with stepped increases in support to increase uptake of colorectal cancer screening: a randomized trial. Ann Intern Med. 2013 Mar 05; 158(5 Pt 1):301-11.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.041
  25. Using body mass index data in the electronic health record to calculate cardiovascular risk. Am J Prev Med. 2012 Apr; 42(4):342-7.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.038
  26. Nonparticipation in a population-based trial to increase colorectal cancer screening. Am J Prev Med. 2012 Apr; 42(4):390-7.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.038
  27. Accuracy of blood pressure measurements reported in an electronic medical record during routine primary care visits. J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich). 2011 Nov; 13(11):821-8.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.037
  28. Patient ability and willingness to participate in a web-based intervention to improve hypertension control. J Med Internet Res. 2011 Jan 20; 13(1):e1.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.035
  29. Systems of support to increase colorectal cancer screening and follow-up rates (SOS): design, challenges, and baseline characteristics of trial participants. Contemp Clin Trials. 2010 Nov; 31(6):589-603.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.034
  30. Effectiveness of home blood pressure monitoring, Web communication, and pharmacist care on hypertension control: a randomized controlled trial. JAMA. 2008 Jun 25; 299(24):2857-67.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.029
  31. Electronic communications and home blood pressure monitoring (e-BP) study: design, delivery, and evaluation framework. Contemp Clin Trials. 2008 May; 29(3):376-95.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.028
  32. Active for life: a work-based physical activity program. Prev Chronic Dis. 2007 Jul; 4(3):A63.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.027
  33. How do minor changes in the definition of blood pressure control affect the reported success of hypertension treatment? Am J Manag Care. 2003 Mar; 9(3):219-24.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.020
  34. Comparing Pharmacist-Led Telehealth Care and Clinic-Based Care for Uncontrolled High Blood Pressure: The Hyperlink 3 Pragmatic Cluster-Randomized Trial. Hypertension. 2022 12; 79(12):2708-2720.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.020
  35. Comparison of explanatory and pragmatic design choices in a cluster-randomized hypertension trial: effects on enrollment, participant characteristics, and adherence. Trials. 2022 Aug 17; 23(1):673.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.020
  36. Association of an Automated Blood Pressure Measurement Quality Improvement Program With Terminal Digit Preference and Recorded Mean Blood Pressure in 11 Clinics. JAMA Netw Open. 2022 08 01; 5(8):e2229098.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.019
  37. Measured weight loss as a precursor to cancer diagnosis: retrospective cohort analysis of 43 302 primary care patients. J Cachexia Sarcopenia Muscle. 2022 Oct; 13(5):2492-2503.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.019
  38. Effectiveness of telephone support in increasing physical activity levels in primary care patients. Am J Prev Med. 2002 Apr; 22(3):177-83.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.019
  39. Renin-Angiotensin-Aldosterone System Inhibitors and COVID-19 Infection or Hospitalization: A Cohort Study. Am J Hypertens. 2021 04 20; 34(4):339-347.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.018
  40. Evidence and Recommendations on the Use of Telemedicine for the Management of Arterial Hypertension: An International Expert Position Paper. Hypertension. 2020 11; 76(5):1368-1383.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.017
  41. Cardiovascular Events and Costs With Home Blood Pressure Telemonitoring and Pharmacist Management for Uncontrolled Hypertension. Hypertension. 2020 10; 76(4):1097-1103.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.017
  42. Barriers and Facilitators to Timely Colonoscopy Completion for Safety Net Clinic Patients. Am J Health Behav. 2020 07 01; 44(4):460-472.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.017
  43. Self-monitoring of Blood Pressure in Patients With Hypertension-Related Multi-morbidity: Systematic Review and Individual Patient Data Meta-analysis. Am J Hypertens. 2020 03 13; 33(3):243-251.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.017
  44. First-year implementation of mailed FIT colorectal cancer screening programs in two Medicaid/Medicare health insurance plans: qualitative learnings from health plan quality improvement staff and leaders. BMC Health Serv Res. 2020 Feb 21; 20(1):132.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.016
  45. Prospective Cohort study of Predictors of Follow-Up Diagnostic Colonoscopy from a Pragmatic Trial of FIT Screening. Sci Rep. 2020 02 12; 10(1):2441.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.016
  46. Design of a pragmatic cluster-randomized trial comparing telehealth care and best practice clinic-based care for uncontrolled high blood pressure. Contemp Clin Trials. 2020 05; 92:105939.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.016
  47. Moderators of the effectiveness of an intervention to increase colorectal cancer screening through mailed fecal immunochemical test kits: results from a pragmatic randomized trial. Trials. 2020 Jan 15; 21(1):91.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.016
  48. Direct-to-member mailed colorectal cancer screening outreach for Medicaid and Medicare enrollees: Implementation and effectiveness outcomes from the BeneFIT study. Cancer. 2020 02 01; 126(3):540-548.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.016
  49. Predictors of Colorectal Cancer Screening Prior to Implementation of a Large Pragmatic Trial in Federally Qualified Health Centers. J Community Health. 2018 02; 43(1):128-136.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.014
  50. Taxonomy for colorectal cancer screening promotion: Lessons from recent randomized controlled trials. Prev Med. 2017 Aug; 101:229-234.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.013
  51. Patient characteristics associated with greater blood pressure control in a randomized trial of home blood pressure telemonitoring and pharmacist management. J Am Soc Hypertens. 2016 11; 10(11):873-880.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.013
  52. A substudy evaluating treatment intensification on medication adherence among hypertensive patients receiving home blood pressure telemonitoring and pharmacist management. J Clin Pharm Ther. 2016 Oct; 41(5):493-8.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.013
  53. Patterns of colorectal cancer screening uptake in newly eligible men and women. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2014 Jul; 23(7):1230-7.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.011
  54. Effectiveness of team training on fall prevention. J Nurs Care Qual. 2014 Apr-Jun; 29(2):164-73.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.011
  55. Challenges and possible solutions to colorectal cancer screening for the underserved. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2014 Apr; 106(4):dju032.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.011
  56. Physician-patient colorectal cancer screening discussions by physicians' screening rates. J Am Board Fam Med. 2012 Nov-Dec; 25(6):771-81.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.010
  57. Reach, engagement, and retention in an Internet-based weight loss program in a multi-site randomized controlled trial. J Med Internet Res. 2007 May 09; 9(2):e11.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.007

© 2024 Kaiser Permanente