Header Logo

Connection

Theodore Levin to Colonoscopy

Back to Details
This is a "connection" page, showing publications Theodore Levin has written about Colonoscopy.
Theodore Levin
Connection Strength
9.303
Colonoscopy
  1. Association Between Time to Colonoscopy After a Positive Fecal Test Result and Risk of Colorectal Cancer and Cancer Stage at Diagnosis. JAMA. 2017 Apr 25; 317(16):1631-1641.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.492
  2. Colorectal cancer screening: 80% by 2018. Colonoscopists simply cannot do it alone. Gastrointest Endosc. 2016 Mar; 83(3):552-4.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.455
  3. Colorectal-cancer screening--coming of age. N Engl J Med. 2013 Sep 19; 369(12):1164-6.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.384
  4. Guidelines for colonoscopy surveillance after screening and polypectomy: a consensus update by the US Multi-Society Task Force on Colorectal Cancer. Gastroenterology. 2012 Sep; 143(3):844-857.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.353
  5. The importance of choosing colorectal cancer screening tests: comment on "Adherence to colorectal cancer screening". Arch Intern Med. 2012 Apr 09; 172(7):582-3.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.347
  6. Dealing with uncertainty: surveillance colonoscopy after polypectomy. Am J Gastroenterol. 2007 Aug; 102(8):1745-7.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.251
  7. Complications of colonoscopy in an integrated health care delivery system. Ann Intern Med. 2006 Dec 19; 145(12):880-6.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.240
  8. Reducing unnecessary surveillance colonoscopies: a mandate for endoscopists. Gastrointest Endosc. 2006 Jan; 63(1):104-6.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.225
  9. Colonoscopic screening of women for colorectal neoplasia. N Engl J Med. 2005 Aug 25; 353(8):844-6; author reply 844-6.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.219
  10. Incomplete screening flexible sigmoidoscopy associated with female sex, age, and increased risk of colorectal cancer. Gut. 2005 Sep; 54(9):1273-8.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.215
  11. Colonoscopy capacity: Can we build it? Will they come? Gastroenterology. 2004 Dec; 127(6):1841-4.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.208
  12. Quality indicators for colonoscopy. Gastrointest Endosc. 2024 Sep; 100(3):352-381.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.204
  13. Does Screening Colonoscopy Have a Future in the United States? Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2023 11; 21(12):3005-3010.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.190
  14. Re: Risk of perforation after colonoscopy and sigmoidoscopy: a population-based study. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2003 Jun 04; 95(11):830-1; author reply 831.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.188
  15. Does family history still matter in the era of screening colonoscopy? Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2003 Mar; 1(2):69-70.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.185
  16. Risk of Colorectal Cancer and Colorectal Cancer Mortality Beginning Ten Years after a Negative Colonoscopy, among Screen-Eligible Adults 76 to 85 Years Old. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2023 01 09; 32(1):37-45.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.183
  17. Could screening for colorectal cancer be harmful? Am J Gastroenterol. 2002 Jan; 97(1):198.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.170
  18. Early Screening of African Americans (45-50 Years Old) in a Fecal Immunochemical Test-Based Colorectal Cancer Screening Program. Gastroenterology. 2020 11; 159(5):1695-1704.e1.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.154
  19. Increased Risk of Colorectal Cancer in Individuals With a History of Serrated Polyps. Gastroenterology. 2020 08; 159(2):502-511.e2.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.151
  20. Long-term Risk of Colorectal Cancer and Related Death After Adenoma Removal in a Large, Community-based Population. Gastroenterology. 2020 03; 158(4):884-894.e5.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.146
  21. Index colonoscopy-related risk factors for postcolonoscopy colorectal cancers. Gastrointest Endosc. 2019 01; 89(1):168-176.e3.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.135
  22. Effects of Organized Colorectal Cancer Screening on Cancer Incidence and Mortality in a Large Community-Based Population. Gastroenterology. 2018 11; 155(5):1383-1391.e5.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.134
  23. Interventions to Improve Follow-up of Positive Results on Fecal Blood Tests: A Systematic Review. Ann Intern Med. 2017 Oct 17; 167(8):565-575.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.127
  24. Diagnosis and predictors of sessile serrated adenoma after educational training in a large, community-based, integrated healthcare setting. Gastrointest Endosc. 2018 Mar; 87(3):755-765.e1.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.126
  25. Time to Diagnostic Testing After a Positive Colorectal Cancer Screening Test. JAMA. 2017 08 01; 318(5):483.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.125
  26. Colorectal Cancer Screening: Recommendations for Physicians and Patients From the U.S. Multi-Society Task Force on Colorectal Cancer. Gastroenterology. 2017 07; 153(1):307-323.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.124
  27. Colorectal Cancer Screening: Recommendations for Physicians and Patients from the U.S. Multi-Society Task Force on Colorectal Cancer. Am J Gastroenterol. 2017 Jul; 112(7):1016-1030.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.124
  28. Colorectal cancer screening: Recommendations for physicians and patients from the U.S. Multi-Society Task Force on Colorectal Cancer. Gastrointest Endosc. 2017 07; 86(1):18-33.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.124
  29. Recommendations on surveillance and management of biallelic mismatch repair deficiency (BMMRD) syndrome: a consensus statement by the US Multi-Society Task Force on Colorectal Cancer. Gastrointest Endosc. 2017 05; 85(5):873-882.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.122
  30. Beyond Colonoscopy: The Role of Alternative Screening Tests for Colorectal Cancer in Your Practice. Am J Gastroenterol. 2017 01; 112(1):8-10.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.119
  31. Effectiveness of screening colonoscopy in reducing the risk of death from right and left colon cancer: a large community-based study. Gut. 2018 02; 67(2):291-298.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.119
  32. Endoscopist fatigue estimates and colonoscopic adenoma detection in a large community-based setting. Gastrointest Endosc. 2017 Mar; 85(3):601-610.e2.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.118
  33. Consequences of Increasing Time to Colonoscopy Examination After Positive Result From Fecal Colorectal Cancer Screening Test. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2016 10; 14(10):1445-1451.e8.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.115
  34. Colonoscopy Surveillance After Colorectal Cancer Resection: Recommendations of the US Multi-Society Task Force on Colorectal Cancer. Gastroenterology. 2016 Mar; 150(3):758-768.e11.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.113
  35. Time to Colonoscopy after Positive Fecal Blood Test in Four U.S. Health Care Systems. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2016 Feb; 25(2):344-50.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.113
  36. Colonoscopy surveillance after colorectal cancer resection: recommendations of the US multi-society task force on colorectal cancer. Gastrointest Endosc. 2016 Mar; 83(3):489-98.e10.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.113
  37. Factors influencing variation in physician adenoma detection rates: a theory-based approach for performance improvement. Gastrointest Endosc. 2016 Mar; 83(3):617-26.e2.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.110
  38. Variation in Adenoma Detection Rate and the Lifetime Benefits and Cost of Colorectal Cancer Screening: A Microsimulation Model. JAMA. 2015 Jun 16; 313(23):2349-58.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.108
  39. Development and validation of an algorithm for classifying colonoscopy indication. Gastrointest Endosc. 2015 Mar; 81(3):575-582.e4.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.105
  40. Colorectal cancer deaths attributable to nonuse of screening in the United States. Ann Epidemiol. 2015 Mar; 25(3):208-213.e1.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.104
  41. Adjusting for patient demographics has minimal effects on rates of adenoma detection in a large, community-based setting. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2015 Apr; 13(4):739-46.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.103
  42. Optimizing adequacy of bowel cleansing for colonoscopy: recommendations from the U.S. multi-society task force on colorectal cancer. Gastrointest Endosc. 2014 Oct; 80(4):543-562.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.103
  43. Optimizing adequacy of bowel cleansing for colonoscopy: recommendations from the US multi-society task force on colorectal cancer. Gastroenterology. 2014 Oct; 147(4):903-24.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.103
  44. Optimizing adequacy of bowel cleansing for colonoscopy: recommendations from the US Multi-Society Task Force on Colorectal Cancer. Am J Gastroenterol. 2014 Oct; 109(10):1528-45.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.103
  45. Health benefits and cost-effectiveness of a hybrid screening strategy for colorectal cancer. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2013 Sep; 11(9):1158-66.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.093
  46. Screening colonoscopy and risk for incident late-stage colorectal cancer diagnosis in average-risk adults: a nested case-control study. Ann Intern Med. 2013 Mar 05; 158(5 Pt 1):312-20.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.092
  47. The American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy PIVI (Preservation and Incorporation of Valuable Endoscopic Innovations) on real-time endoscopic assessment of the histology of diminutive colorectal polyps. Gastrointest Endosc. 2011 Mar; 73(3):419-22.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.080
  48. Implications of new colorectal cancer screening technologies for primary care practice. Med Care. 2008 Sep; 46(9 Suppl 1):S138-46.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.068
  49. Medical therapy for diabetes is associated with increased use of lower endoscopy. Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2007 Nov; 16(11):1195-202.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.064
  50. Standardized colonoscopy reporting and data system: report of the Quality Assurance Task Group of the National Colorectal Cancer Roundtable. Gastrointest Endosc. 2007 May; 65(6):757-66.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.062
  51. Guidelines for colonoscopy surveillance after cancer resection: a consensus update by the American Cancer Society and the US Multi-Society Task Force on Colorectal Cancer. Gastroenterology. 2006 May; 130(6):1865-71.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.057
  52. Guidelines for colonoscopy surveillance after polypectomy: a consensus update by the US Multi-Society Task Force on Colorectal Cancer and the American Cancer Society. Gastroenterology. 2006 May; 130(6):1872-85.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.057
  53. Guidelines for colonoscopy surveillance after polypectomy: a consensus update by the US Multi-Society Task Force on Colorectal Cancer and the American Cancer Society. CA Cancer J Clin. 2006 May-Jun; 56(3):143-59; quiz 184-5.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.057
  54. Guidelines for colonoscopy surveillance after cancer resection: a consensus update by the American Cancer Society and US Multi-Society Task Force on Colorectal Cancer. CA Cancer J Clin. 2006 May-Jun; 56(3):160-7; quiz 185-6.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.057
  55. Surveillance Colonoscopy Findings in Older Adults With a History of Colorectal Adenomas. JAMA Netw Open. 2024 Apr 01; 7(4):e244611.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.050
  56. Screening for Colorectal Cancer in Asymptomatic Average-Risk Adults. Ann Intern Med. 2024 Apr; 177(4):542-543.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.050
  57. Unsatisfactory Fecal Immunochemical Tests for Colorectal Cancer Screening: Prevalence, Reasons, and Subsequent Testing. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2024 Feb 06; 33(2):215-223.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.049
  58. What does sigmoidoscopy really miss? Am J Gastroenterol. 2003 Oct; 98(10):2326-7.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.048
  59. Impact and Recovery from COVID-19-Related Disruptions in Colorectal Cancer Screening and Care in the US: A Scenario Analysis. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2023 01 09; 32(1):22-29.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.046
  60. Quality in the technical performance of colonoscopy and the continuous quality improvement process for colonoscopy: recommendations of the U.S. Multi-Society Task Force on Colorectal Cancer. Am J Gastroenterol. 2002 Jun; 97(6):1296-308.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.044
  61. Flexible sigmoidoscopy: an important screening option for average-risk individuals. Gastrointest Endosc Clin N Am. 2002 Jan; 12(1):23-40, vi.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.043
  62. Heterogeneity in colorectal cancer incidence among people recommended 3-yearly surveillance post-polypectomy: a validation study. Endoscopy. 2021 Apr; 53(4):402-410.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.039
  63. The effect of using fecal testing after a negative sigmoidoscopy on the risk of death from colorectal cancer. J Med Screen. 2021 06; 28(2):140-147.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.038
  64. Colorectal cancer screening: new opportunities. Surg Oncol Clin N Am. 1999 Oct; 8(4):673-91, vi-vii.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.036
  65. Predicting advanced proximal colonic neoplasia with screening sigmoidoscopy. JAMA. 1999 May 05; 281(17):1611-7.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.035
  66. A Comparison of Fecal Immunochemical and High-Sensitivity Guaiac Tests for Colorectal Cancer Screening. Am J Gastroenterol. 2017 Nov; 112(11):1728-1735.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.032
  67. Importance of colonic adenomas 5 mm or less in diameter. N Engl J Med. 1997 Jun 12; 336(24):1761-2.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.031
  68. Recommendations on Fecal Immunochemical Testing to Screen for Colorectal Neoplasia: A Consensus Statement by the US Multi-Society Task Force on Colorectal Cancer. Gastroenterology. 2017 04; 152(5):1217-1237.e3.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.030
  69. Recommendations on Fecal Immunochemical Testing to Screen for Colorectal Neoplasia: A Consensus Statement by the US Multi-Society Task Force on Colorectal Cancer. Am J Gastroenterol. 2017 01; 112(1):37-53.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.030
  70. Recommendations on fecal immunochemical testing to screen for colorectal neoplasia: a consensus statement by the US Multi-Society Task Force on colorectal cancer. Gastrointest Endosc. 2017 Jan; 85(1):2-21.e3.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.030
  71. Shifts in the Fecal Microbiota Associated with Adenomatous Polyps. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2017 01; 26(1):85-94.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.030
  72. Race/Ethnicity and Adoption of a Population Health Management Approach to Colorectal Cancer Screening in a Community-Based Healthcare System. J Gen Intern Med. 2016 11; 31(11):1323-1330.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.029
  73. Fecal Immunochemical Test Program Performance Over 4 Rounds of Annual Screening: A Retrospective Cohort Study. Ann Intern Med. 2016 Apr 05; 164(7):456-63.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.028
  74. Adenoma detection rate and risk of colorectal cancer and death. N Engl J Med. 2014 Apr 03; 370(14):1298-306.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.025
  75. Incidence and mortality of colorectal adenocarcinoma in persons with inflammatory bowel disease from 1998 to 2010. Gastroenterology. 2012 Aug; 143(2):382-9.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.022
  76. Lack of association between insulin sensitivity and colorectal adenoma risk. Nutr Cancer. 2011; 63(1):6-11.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.020
  77. Stool DNA and occult blood testing for screen detection of colorectal neoplasia. Ann Intern Med. 2008 Oct 07; 149(7):441-50, W81.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.017
  78. Thiazolidinedione therapy is not associated with increased colonic neoplasia risk in patients with diabetes mellitus. Gastroenterology. 2008 Dec; 135(6):1914-23, 1923.e1.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.017
  79. Screening and surveillance for the early detection of colorectal cancer and adenomatous polyps, 2008: a joint guideline from the American Cancer Society, the US Multi-Society Task Force on Colorectal Cancer, and the American College of Radiology. CA Cancer J Clin. 2008 May-Jun; 58(3):130-60.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.016
  80. Screening for colorectal neoplasms with new fecal occult blood tests: update on performance characteristics. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2007 Oct 03; 99(19):1462-70.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.016
  81. Change in body size and the risk of colorectal adenomas. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2007 Mar; 16(3):526-31.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.015

© 2024 Kaiser Permanente