Bette Caan to Energy Intake
This is a "connection" page, showing publications Bette Caan has written about Energy Intake.
Connection Strength
1.136
-
Low energy reporting may increase in intervention participants enrolled in dietary intervention trials. J Am Diet Assoc. 2004 Mar; 104(3):357-66; quiz 491.
Score: 0.217
-
Low-energy reporters: evaluation of potential differential reporting in case-control studies. Nutr Cancer. 2002; 42(2):173-9.
Score: 0.187
-
Evaluation and comparison of food records, recalls, and frequencies for energy and protein assessment by using recovery biomarkers. Am J Epidemiol. 2011 Sep 01; 174(5):591-603.
Score: 0.091
-
Biomarker-calibrated energy and protein consumption and increased cancer risk among postmenopausal women. Am J Epidemiol. 2009 Apr 15; 169(8):977-89.
Score: 0.077
-
Use of recovery biomarkers to calibrate nutrient consumption self-reports in the Women's Health Initiative. Am J Epidemiol. 2008 May 15; 167(10):1247-59.
Score: 0.072
-
Associations between BMI, energy intake, energy expenditure, VDR genotype and colon and rectal cancers (United States). Cancer Causes Control. 2004 Nov; 15(9):863-72.
Score: 0.057
-
Energy balance and rectal cancer: an evaluation of energy intake, energy expenditure, and body mass index. Nutr Cancer. 2003; 46(2):166-71.
Score: 0.050
-
Low-energy reporting in women at risk for breast cancer recurrence. Women's Healthy Eating and Living Group. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2000 Oct; 9(10):1091-7.
Score: 0.043
-
Prenatal Depression and Diet Quality During Pregnancy. J Acad Nutr Diet. 2020 06; 120(6):972-984.
Score: 0.041
-
Dietary energy sources and colon cancer risk. Am J Epidemiol. 1997 Feb 01; 145(3):199-210.
Score: 0.033
-
Energy balance and colon cancer--beyond physical activity. Cancer Res. 1997 Jan 01; 57(1):75-80.
Score: 0.033
-
Women gain weight 1 year after smoking cessation while dietary intake temporarily increases. J Am Diet Assoc. 1996 Nov; 96(11):1150-5.
Score: 0.033
-
Variations in sensitivity, specificity, and predictive value of a dietary fat screener modified from Block et al. J Am Diet Assoc. 1995 May; 95(5):564-8.
Score: 0.029
-
A comparison of two methods to ascertain dietary intake: the CARDIA Study. J Clin Epidemiol. 1994 Jul; 47(7):701-11.
Score: 0.028
-
Mailed dietary surveys: response rates, error rates, and the effect of omitted food items on nutrient values. Epidemiology. 1991 Nov; 2(6):430-6.
Score: 0.023
-
Diet and colorectal cancer: analysis of a candidate pathway using SNPS, haplotypes, and multi-gene assessment. Nutr Cancer. 2011 Nov; 63(8):1226-34.
Score: 0.023
-
Low-fat dietary pattern and risk of cardiovascular disease: the Women's Health Initiative Randomized Controlled Dietary Modification Trial. JAMA. 2006 Feb 08; 295(6):655-66.
Score: 0.016
-
PPARgamma, energy balance, and associations with colon and rectal cancer. Nutr Cancer. 2005; 51(2):155-61.
Score: 0.014
-
On the importance of using multiple methods of dietary assessment. Epidemiology. 2004 Nov; 15(6):738-45.
Score: 0.014
-
Food intake and weight gain in pregnant women. Am J Clin Nutr. 1983 Nov; 38(5):815-7.
Score: 0.013
-
Implementation of a 4-y, high-fiber, high-fruit-and-vegetable, low-fat dietary intervention: results of dietary changes in the Polyp Prevention Trial. Am J Clin Nutr. 2001 Sep; 74(3):387-401.
Score: 0.011
-
Factors associated with weight gain in women after diagnosis of breast cancer. Women's Healthy Eating and Living Study Group. J Am Diet Assoc. 1999 Oct; 99(10):1212-21.
Score: 0.010
-
The polyp prevention trial II: dietary intervention program and participant baseline dietary characteristics. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 1996 May; 5(5):385-92.
Score: 0.008
-
Associations of body fat and its distribution with dietary intake, physical activity, alcohol, and smoking in blacks and whites. Am J Clin Nutr. 1992 May; 55(5):943-9.
Score: 0.006
-
The CARDIA dietary history: development, implementation, and evaluation. J Am Diet Assoc. 1991 Sep; 91(9):1104-12.
Score: 0.006