John Adams to United States
This is a "connection" page, showing publications John Adams has written about United States.
Connection Strength
0.650
-
Evaluating health management programmes over time: application of propensity score-based weighting to longitudinal data. J Eval Clin Pract. 2010 Feb; 16(1):180-5.
Score: 0.048
-
Determining if disease management saves money: an introduction to meta-analysis. J Eval Clin Pract. 2007 Jun; 13(3):400-7.
Score: 0.040
-
Sampling patients within physician practices and health plans: multistage cluster samples in health services research. Health Serv Res. 2003 Dec; 38(6 Pt 1):1625-40.
Score: 0.031
-
The Contribution of First-name Information to the Accuracy of Racial-and-Ethnic Imputations Varies by Sex and Race-and-Ethnicity Among Medicare Beneficiaries. Med Care. 2022 Aug 01; 60(8):556-562.
Score: 0.028
-
Disparities In The Quality Of Clinical Care Delivered To American Indian/Alaska Native Medicare Advantage Enrollees. Health Aff (Millwood). 2022 05; 41(5):663-670.
Score: 0.028
-
Patient-Reported Care Coordination is Associated with Better Performance on Clinical Care Measures. J Gen Intern Med. 2021 12; 36(12):3665-3671.
Score: 0.027
-
Imputation of race/ethnicity to enable measurement of HEDIS performance by race/ethnicity. Health Serv Res. 2019 02; 54(1):13-23.
Score: 0.022
-
Racial And Ethnic Differences In The Attainment Of Behavioral Health Quality Measures In Medicare Advantage Plans. Health Aff (Millwood). 2018 10; 37(10):1685-1692.
Score: 0.022
-
How Do Gender Differences in Quality of Care Vary Across Medicare Advantage Plans? J Gen Intern Med. 2018 10; 33(10):1752-1759.
Score: 0.022
-
Development and Testing of the Pediatric Respiratory Illness Measurement System (PRIMES) Quality Indicators. Hosp Pediatr. 2017 03; 7(3):125-133.
Score: 0.019
-
Do Racial/Ethnic Disparities in Quality and Patient Experience within Medicare Plans Generalize across Measures and Racial/Ethnic Groups? Health Serv Res. 2015 Dec; 50(6):1829-49.
Score: 0.017
-
Better-than-average and worse-than-average hospitals may not significantly differ from average hospitals: an analysis of Medicare Hospital Compare ratings. BMJ Qual Saf. 2015 Feb; 24(2):128-34.
Score: 0.017
-
Evaluation of a center of excellence program for spine surgery. Med Care. 2013 Aug; 51(8):748-57.
Score: 0.015
-
Osteoporosis medication adherence: physician perceptions vs. patients' utilization. Bone. 2013 Jul; 55(1):1-6.
Score: 0.015
-
Measuring the improving quality of outpatient care in medical oncology practices in the United States. J Clin Oncol. 2013 Apr 10; 31(11):1471-7.
Score: 0.015
-
Validity and feasibility of the american college of surgeons colectomy composite outcome quality measure. Ann Surg. 2013 Mar; 257(3):483-9.
Score: 0.015
-
Evaluation of centers of excellence program for knee and hip replacement. Med Care. 2013 Jan; 51(1):28-36.
Score: 0.015
-
Physicians with the least experience have higher cost profiles than do physicians with the most experience. Health Aff (Millwood). 2012 Nov; 31(11):2453-63.
Score: 0.014
-
Reporting CAHPS and HEDIS data by race/ethnicity for Medicare beneficiaries. Health Serv Res. 2013 Apr; 48(2 Pt 1):417-34.
Score: 0.014
-
Direct healthcare costs of osteoporosis-related fractures in managed care patients receiving pharmacological osteoporosis therapy. Appl Health Econ Health Policy. 2012 May 01; 10(3):163-73.
Score: 0.014
-
Medication adherence and fracture risk among patients on bisphosphonate therapy in a large United States health plan. Bone. 2012 Apr; 50(4):870-5.
Score: 0.014
-
Patterns of osteoporosis treatment change and treatment discontinuation among commercial and Medicare Advantage Prescription Drug members in a national health plan. J Eval Clin Pract. 2013 Feb; 19(1):50-9.
Score: 0.013
-
Depression and medication adherence in the treatment of chronic diseases in the United States: a meta-analysis. J Gen Intern Med. 2011 Oct; 26(10):1175-82.
Score: 0.013
-
Electronic health record adoption and quality improvement in US hospitals. Am J Manag Care. 2010 Dec; 16(12 Suppl HIT):SP64-71.
Score: 0.013
-
Use of radical cystectomy for patients with invasive bladder cancer. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2010 Jun 02; 102(11):802-11.
Score: 0.012
-
Comparing costs and quality of care at retail clinics with that of other medical settings for 3 common illnesses. Ann Intern Med. 2009 Sep 01; 151(5):321-8.
Score: 0.012
-
Availability of data for measuring physician quality performance. Am J Manag Care. 2009 Jan; 15(1):67-72.
Score: 0.011
-
Benchmarking physician performance: reliability of individual and composite measures. Am J Manag Care. 2008 Dec; 14(12):833-8.
Score: 0.011
-
Retail clinics, primary care physicians, and emergency departments: a comparison of patients' visits. Health Aff (Millwood). 2008 Sep-Oct; 27(5):1272-82.
Score: 0.011
-
The quality of ambulatory care delivered to children in the United States. N Engl J Med. 2007 Oct 11; 357(15):1515-23.
Score: 0.010
-
Quality by any other name?: a comparison of three profiling systems for assessing health care quality. Health Serv Res. 2007 Oct; 42(5):2070-87.
Score: 0.010
-
Relationship between number of medical conditions and quality of care. N Engl J Med. 2007 Jun 14; 356(24):2496-504.
Score: 0.010
-
Patient centered experiences in breast cancer: predicting long-term adherence to tamoxifen use. Med Care. 2007 May; 45(5):431-9.
Score: 0.010
-
The quality of obstructive lung disease care for adults in the United States as measured by adherence to recommended processes. Chest. 2006 Dec; 130(6):1844-50.
Score: 0.010
-
Who is at greatest risk for receiving poor-quality health care? N Engl J Med. 2006 Mar 16; 354(11):1147-56.
Score: 0.009
-
Generalizing disease management program results: how to get from here to there. Manag Care Interface. 2004 Jul; 17(7):38-45.
Score: 0.008
-
Using an empirical method for establishing clinical outcome targets in disease management programs. Dis Manag. 2004; 7(2):93-101.
Score: 0.008
-
Evaluating disease management program effectiveness: an introduction to survival analysis. Dis Manag. 2004; 7(3):180-90.
Score: 0.008
-
Practice characteristics and HMO enrollee satisfaction with specialty care: an analysis of patients with glaucoma and diabetic retinopathy. Health Serv Res. 2003 Aug; 38(4):1135-55.
Score: 0.008
-
An assessment of the total population approach for evaluating disease management program effectiveness. Dis Manag. 2003; 6(2):93-102.
Score: 0.007
-
Characteristics of eye care practices with managed care contracts. Am J Manag Care. 2002 Dec; 8(12):1057-67.
Score: 0.007