Julie Schmittdiel to California
This is a "connection" page, showing publications Julie Schmittdiel has written about California.
Connection Strength
2.000
-
Identifying Predictors of Homelessness Among Adults in a Large Integrated Health System in Northern California. Perm J. 2023 03 15; 27(1):56-71.
Score: 0.141
-
Opportunities to encourage mail order pharmacy delivery service use for diabetes prescriptions: a qualitative study. BMC Health Serv Res. 2019 Jun 25; 19(1):422.
Score: 0.109
-
Opportunities to Reduce Diabetes Risk in Women of Reproductive Age: Assessment and Treatment of Prediabetes within a Large Integrated Delivery System. Womens Health Issues. 2017 Nov - Dec; 27(6):666-672.
Score: 0.095
-
Improvements in access and care through the Affordable Care Act. Am J Manag Care. 2017 Mar 01; 23(3):e95-e97.
Score: 0.092
-
The impact of telephonic wellness coaching on weight loss: A "Natural Experiments for Translation in Diabetes (NEXT-D)" study. Obesity (Silver Spring). 2017 02; 25(2):352-356.
Score: 0.092
-
Telephone-Based Coaching. Am J Health Promot. 2017 03; 31(2):136-142.
Score: 0.091
-
Wellness Coaching for People With Prediabetes: A Randomized Encouragement Trial to Evaluate Outreach Methods at Kaiser Permanente, Northern California, 2013. Prev Chronic Dis. 2015 Nov 25; 12:E207.
Score: 0.085
-
Employer-Based Screening for Diabetes and Prediabetes in an Integrated Health Care Delivery System: A Natural Experiment for Translation in Diabetes (NEXT-D) Study. J Occup Environ Med. 2015 Nov; 57(11):1147-53.
Score: 0.084
-
Impact of a pharmacy benefit change on new use of mail order pharmacy among diabetes patients: the Diabetes Study of Northern California (DISTANCE). Health Serv Res. 2015 Apr; 50(2):537-59.
Score: 0.078
-
Initial persistence with antihypertensive therapies is associated with depression treatment persistence, but not depression. J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich). 2014 Jun; 16(6):412-7.
Score: 0.076
-
Safety and effectiveness of mail order pharmacy use in diabetes. Am J Manag Care. 2013 Nov; 19(11):882-7.
Score: 0.073
-
Patient satisfaction and perceived success with a telephonic health coaching program: the Natural Experiments for Translation in Diabetes (NEXT-D) Study, Northern California, 2011. Prev Chronic Dis. 2013 Oct 31; 10:E179.
Score: 0.073
-
Health-plan and employer-based wellness programs to reduce diabetes risk: The Kaiser Permanente Northern California NEXT-D Study. Prev Chronic Dis. 2013; 10:E15.
Score: 0.069
-
The comparative effectiveness of mail order pharmacy use vs. local pharmacy use on LDL-C control in new statin users. J Gen Intern Med. 2011 Dec; 26(12):1396-402.
Score: 0.063
-
The association of patient-physician gender concordance with cardiovascular disease risk factor control and treatment in diabetes. J Womens Health (Larchmt). 2009 Dec; 18(12):2065-70.
Score: 0.056
-
The effectiveness of diabetes care management in managed care. Am J Manag Care. 2009 May; 15(5):295-301.
Score: 0.054
-
Medicare Part D coverage gap and diabetes beneficiaries. Am J Manag Care. 2009 Mar; 15(3):189-93.
Score: 0.053
-
Why don't diabetes patients achieve recommended risk factor targets? Poor adherence versus lack of treatment intensification. J Gen Intern Med. 2008 May; 23(5):588-94.
Score: 0.050
-
Predicted quality-adjusted life years as a composite measure of the clinical value of diabetes risk factor control. Med Care. 2007 Apr; 45(4):315-21.
Score: 0.047
-
Maternal hyperglycemia during pregnancy predicts adiposity of the offspring. Diabetes Care. 2014 Nov; 37(11):2996-3002.
Score: 0.039
-
Choice of a primary care physician and its relationship to adherence among patients with diabetes. Am J Manag Care. 2002 Sep; 8(9):777-84.
Score: 0.034
-
Incidence of 30-Day Venous Thromboembolism in Adults Tested for SARS-CoV-2 Infection in an Integrated Health Care System in Northern California. JAMA Intern Med. 2021 07 01; 181(7):997-1000.
Score: 0.031
-
Yoga for heart failure patients: a feasibility pilot study with a multiethnic population. Int J Yoga Therap. 2011; (21):77-83.
Score: 0.030
-
SARS-CoV-2 Clinical Outcomes in Patients with Cancer in a Large Integrated Health Care System in Northern California. Oncologist. 2021 03; 26(3):e500-e504.
Score: 0.030
-
Women's provider preferences for basic gynecology care in a large health maintenance organization. J Womens Health Gend Based Med. 1999 Jul-Aug; 8(6):825-33.
Score: 0.027
-
Effects of dietary fiber, fats, and meat intakes on the risk of Barrett's esophagus. Nutr Cancer. 2009; 61(5):607-16.
Score: 0.026
-
Cigarette smoking and the risk of Barrett's esophagus. Cancer Causes Control. 2009 Apr; 20(3):303-11.
Score: 0.026
-
The Relationship Between Prescription Copayments and Contraceptive Adherence in a New-user Cohort. Med Care. 2018 07; 56(7):577-582.
Score: 0.025
-
Choice of a personal physician and patient satisfaction in a health maintenance organization. JAMA. 1997 Nov 19; 278(19):1596-9.
Score: 0.024
-
Incidence of diabetes after a partner's diagnosis. Prev Med. 2017 Dec; 105:52-57.
Score: 0.024
-
Pre-Visit Prioritization for complex patients with diabetes: Randomized trial design and implementation within an integrated health care system. Contemp Clin Trials. 2016 Mar; 47:196-201.
Score: 0.021
-
A pragmatic cluster randomized clinical trial of diabetes prevention strategies for women with gestational diabetes: design and rationale of the Gestational Diabetes' Effects on Moms (GEM) study. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2014 Jan 15; 14:21.
Score: 0.019
-
Exercise as a vital sign: a quasi-experimental analysis of a health system intervention to collect patient-reported exercise levels. J Gen Intern Med. 2014 Feb; 29(2):341-8.
Score: 0.018
-
Improving treatment intensification to reduce cardiovascular disease risk: a cluster randomized trial. BMC Health Serv Res. 2012 Jul 02; 12:183.
Score: 0.017
-
Study protocol: the Adherence and Intensification of Medications (AIM) study--a cluster randomized controlled effectiveness study. Trials. 2010 Oct 12; 11:95.
Score: 0.015
-
Trends in time to confirmation and recognition of new-onset hypertension, 2002-2006. Hypertension. 2010 Oct; 56(4):605-11.
Score: 0.015
-
The impact of removing financial incentives from clinical quality indicators: longitudinal analysis of four Kaiser Permanente indicators. BMJ. 2010 May 11; 340:c1898.
Score: 0.014
-
The predictors of patient-physician race and ethnic concordance: a medical facility fixed-effects approach. Health Serv Res. 2010 Jun; 45(3):792-805.
Score: 0.014
-
Meaningful variation in performance: what does variation in quality tell us about improving quality? Med Care. 2010 Feb; 48(2):133-9.
Score: 0.014
-
Treatment intensification and risk factor control: toward more clinically relevant quality measures. Med Care. 2009 Apr; 47(4):395-402.
Score: 0.013
-
Matching patients and practitioners based on beliefs about care: results of a randomized controlled trial. Am J Manag Care. 2004 Nov; 10(11 Pt 1):814-22.
Score: 0.010
-
Racial and ethnic differences in a patient survey: patients' values, ratings, and reports regarding physician primary care performance in a large health maintenance organization. Med Care. 2000 Mar; 38(3):300-10.
Score: 0.007
-
Quality of primary care practice in a large HMO according to physician specialty. Health Serv Res. 1999 Jun; 34(2):485-502.
Score: 0.007
-
Differences in resource use and costs of primary care in a large HMO according to physician specialty. Health Serv Res. 1999 Jun; 34(2):503-18.
Score: 0.007
-
Costs of acid-related disorders to a health maintenance organization. Am J Med. 1997 Dec; 103(6):520-8.
Score: 0.006
-
The impact of aging and chronic disease on use of hospital and outpatient services in a large HMO: 1971-1991. J Am Geriatr Soc. 1997 Jun; 45(6):667-74.
Score: 0.006