Elizabeth McGlynn to United States
This is a "connection" page, showing publications Elizabeth McGlynn has written about United States.
Connection Strength
2.227
-
The Kaiser Permanente Research Bank Cancer Cohort: a collaborative resource to improve cancer care and survivorship. BMC Cancer. 2022 Feb 25; 22(1):209.
Score: 0.108
-
Measuring and Improving Quality in the US: Where Are We Today? J Am Board Fam Med. 2020 Sep-Oct; 33(Suppl):S28-S35.
Score: 0.097
-
Improving the Quality of U.S. Health Care - What Will It Take? N Engl J Med. 2020 Aug 27; 383(9):801-803.
Score: 0.097
-
Return of Research-Related Genetic Test Results and Genetic Discrimination Concerns: Facilitators and Barriers of Genetic Research Participation in Diverse Groups. Public Health Genomics. 2020; 23(1-2):59-68.
Score: 0.095
-
Development and Testing of the Pediatric Respiratory Illness Measurement System (PRIMES) Quality Indicators. Hosp Pediatr. 2017 03; 7(3):125-133.
Score: 0.076
-
Creating Safe Harbors for Quality Measurement Innovation and Improvement. JAMA. 2016 Jan 12; 315(2):129-30.
Score: 0.071
-
Measurement Is Essential for Improving Diagnosis and Reducing Diagnostic Error: A Report From the Institute of Medicine. JAMA. 2015 Dec 15; 314(23):2501-2.
Score: 0.070
-
Reimagining quality measurement. N Engl J Med. 2014 Dec 04; 371(23):2150-3.
Score: 0.065
-
Developing a data infrastructure for a learning health system: the PORTAL network. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2014 Jul-Aug; 21(4):596-601.
Score: 0.063
-
Exploring public attitudes towards approaches to discussing costs in the clinical encounter. J Gen Intern Med. 2014 Jan; 29(1):223-9.
Score: 0.059
-
Electronic health record adoption and quality improvement in US hospitals. Am J Manag Care. 2010 Dec; 16(12 Suppl HIT):SP64-71.
Score: 0.050
-
Could we have covered more people at less cost? Technically, yes; politically, probably not. Health Aff (Millwood). 2010 Jun; 29(6):1142-6.
Score: 0.048
-
Controlling U.S. health care spending--separating promising from unpromising approaches. N Engl J Med. 2009 Nov 26; 361(22):2109-11.
Score: 0.046
-
Comparing costs and quality of care at retail clinics with that of other medical settings for 3 common illnesses. Ann Intern Med. 2009 Sep 01; 151(5):321-8.
Score: 0.045
-
A systematic review of health care efficiency measures. Health Serv Res. 2009 Jun; 44(3):784-805.
Score: 0.044
-
Retail clinics, primary care physicians, and emergency departments: a comparison of patients' visits. Health Aff (Millwood). 2008 Sep-Oct; 27(5):1272-82.
Score: 0.042
-
Assessment of the scientific soundness of clinical performance measures: a field test of the National Committee for Quality Assurance's colorectal cancer screening measure. Arch Intern Med. 2008 Apr 28; 168(8):876-82.
Score: 0.041
-
The quality of ambulatory care delivered to children in the United States. N Engl J Med. 2007 Oct 11; 357(15):1515-23.
Score: 0.040
-
The quality of obstructive lung disease care for adults in the United States as measured by adherence to recommended processes. Chest. 2006 Dec; 130(6):1844-50.
Score: 0.038
-
The quality of pharmacologic care for adults in the United States. Med Care. 2006 Oct; 44(10):936-45.
Score: 0.037
-
Massachusetts health reform: beauty is in the eye of the beholder. Health Aff (Millwood). 2006 Nov-Dec; 25(6):w447-9.
Score: 0.037
-
Who is at greatest risk for receiving poor-quality health care? N Engl J Med. 2006 Mar 16; 354(11):1147-56.
Score: 0.036
-
Funding for biomedical research. JAMA. 2006 Mar 01; 295(9):1000; author reply 1000-1.
Score: 0.036
-
There is no perfect health system. Health Aff (Millwood). 2004 May-Jun; 23(3):100-2.
Score: 0.031
-
Improving women's quality of care for cardiovascular disease and diabetes: the feasibility and desirability of stratified reporting of objective performance measures. Womens Health Issues. 2003 Jul-Aug; 13(4):150-7.
Score: 0.030
-
The quality of health care delivered to adults in the United States. N Engl J Med. 2003 Jun 26; 348(26):2635-45.
Score: 0.030
-
Quality of health care for women: a demonstration of the quality assessment tools system. Med Care. 2003 May; 41(5):616-25.
Score: 0.029
-
Introduction and overview of the conceptual framework for a national quality measurement and reporting system. Med Care. 2003 Jan; 41(1 Suppl):I1-7.
Score: 0.029
-
An evidence-based national quality measurement and reporting system. Med Care. 2003 Jan; 41(1 Suppl):I8-15.
Score: 0.029
-
Establishing national goals for quality improvement. Med Care. 2003 Jan; 41(1 Suppl):I16-29.
Score: 0.029
-
Selecting common measures of quality and system performance. Med Care. 2003 Jan; 41(1 Suppl):I39-47.
Score: 0.029
-
An observational study of antibiotic prescribing behavior and the Hawthorne effect. Health Serv Res. 2002 Dec; 37(6):1603-23.
Score: 0.028
-
Keeping quality on the policy agenda. Health Aff (Millwood). 2001 May-Jun; 20(3):82-90.
Score: 0.025
-
Demographic differences in the utilization of clinical and direct-to-consumer genetic testing. J Genet Couns. 2020 08; 29(4):634-643.
Score: 0.023
-
New approach to assessing clinical quality of care for women: the QA Tool system. Womens Health Issues. 1999 Jul-Aug; 9(4):184-92.
Score: 0.022
-
Quality of care for women: where are we now and where are we headed? Womens Health Issues. 1999 Mar-Apr; 9(2):65-80; discussion 93-106.
Score: 0.022
-
A Framework for Increasing Trust Between Patients and the Organizations That Care for Them. JAMA. 2019 Feb 12; 321(6):539-540.
Score: 0.022
-
Services to families of adults with schizophrenia: from treatment recommendations to dissemination. Psychiatr Serv. 1999 Feb; 50(2):233-8.
Score: 0.022
-
The outcomes utility index: will outcomes data tell us what we want to know? Int J Qual Health Care. 1998 Dec; 10(6):485-90.
Score: 0.022
-
Advancing the Science of Healthcare Service Delivery: The NHLBI Corporate Healthcare Leaders' Panel. Glob Heart. 2018 12; 13(4):339-345.
Score: 0.021
-
Improving the quality of healthcare for children: implementing the results of the AHSR research agenda conference. Health Serv Res. 1998 Oct; 33(4 Pt 2):955-76.
Score: 0.021
-
Overview of issues in improving quality of care for children. Health Serv Res. 1998 Oct; 33(4 Pt 2):977-1000.
Score: 0.021
-
Assessing the quality of healthcare provided to children. Health Serv Res. 1998 Oct; 33(4 Pt 2):1059-90.
Score: 0.021
-
Choosing and evaluating clinical performance measures. Jt Comm J Qual Improv. 1998 Sep; 24(9):470-9.
Score: 0.021
-
Developing a clinical performance measure. Am J Prev Med. 1998 Apr; 14(3 Suppl):14-21.
Score: 0.021
-
The effect of managed care on primary care services for women. Womens Health Issues. 1998 Jan-Feb; 8(1):1-14; discussion 25-31.
Score: 0.020
-
Six challenges in measuring the quality of health care. Health Aff (Millwood). 1997 May-Jun; 16(3):7-21.
Score: 0.019
-
Health system reform and quality. JAMA. 1996 Aug 14; 276(6):476-80.
Score: 0.018
-
Choosing chronic disease measures for HEDIS: conceptual framework and review of seven clinical areas. Manag Care Q. 1996; 4(3):54-77.
Score: 0.018
-
Quality assessment of reproductive health services. West J Med. 1995 Sep; 163(3 Suppl):19-27.
Score: 0.017
-
Assessing the quality of care for children. Prospects under health reform. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 1995 Apr; 149(4):359-68.
Score: 0.017
-
Using Medicaid and CHIP claims data to support pediatric quality measurement: lessons from 3 centers of excellence in measure development. Acad Pediatr. 2014 Sep-Oct; 14(5 Suppl):S76-81.
Score: 0.016
-
Comparative effectiveness topics from a large, integrated delivery system. Perm J. 2013; 17(4):4-13.
Score: 0.014
-
Physicians with the least experience have higher cost profiles than do physicians with the most experience. Health Aff (Millwood). 2012 Nov; 31(11):2453-63.
Score: 0.014
-
Depression and medication adherence in the treatment of chronic diseases in the United States: a meta-analysis. J Gen Intern Med. 2011 Oct; 26(10):1175-82.
Score: 0.013
-
Bending the curve through health reform implementation. Am J Manag Care. 2010 Nov; 16(11):804-12.
Score: 0.012
-
Bending the curve: effective steps to address long-term healthcare spending growth. Am J Manag Care. 2009 Oct; 15(10):676-80.
Score: 0.011
-
Pew Memorial Trust policy synthesis: 5. State coverage for organ transplantation: a framework for decision making. Health Serv Res. 1988 Feb; 22(6):881-922.
Score: 0.010
-
Quality-of-care research in mental health: responding to the challenge. Inquiry. 1988; 25(1):157-70.
Score: 0.010
-
Quality by any other name?: a comparison of three profiling systems for assessing health care quality. Health Serv Res. 2007 Oct; 42(5):2070-87.
Score: 0.010
-
Relationship between number of medical conditions and quality of care. N Engl J Med. 2007 Jun 14; 356(24):2496-504.
Score: 0.010
-
Clinical practice guidelines for older patients with comorbid diseases. JAMA. 2006 Jan 04; 295(1):34; author reply 34-5.
Score: 0.009
-
Quality of care for hypertension in the United States. BMC Cardiovasc Disord. 2005 Jan 07; 5(1):1.
Score: 0.008
-
How good is the quality of health care in the United States? 1998. Milbank Q. 2005; 83(4):843-95.
Score: 0.008
-
Comparison of quality of care for patients in the Veterans Health Administration and patients in a national sample. Ann Intern Med. 2004 Dec 21; 141(12):938-45.
Score: 0.008
-
Profiling the quality of care in twelve communities: results from the CQI study. Health Aff (Millwood). 2004 May-Jun; 23(3):247-56.
Score: 0.008
-
Paying for performance: Medicare should lead. Health Aff (Millwood). 2003 Nov-Dec; 22(6):8-10.
Score: 0.008
-
Can health care quality indicators be transferred between countries? Qual Saf Health Care. 2003 Feb; 12(1):8-12.
Score: 0.007
-
Screening for chlamydia in adolescents and young women. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2000 Nov; 154(11):1108-13.
Score: 0.006
-
Impact of sociodemographic case mix on the HEDIS measures of health plan quality. Med Care. 2000 Oct; 38(10):981-92.
Score: 0.006
-
Defining and measuring quality of care: a perspective from US researchers. Int J Qual Health Care. 2000 Aug; 12(4):281-95.
Score: 0.006
-
Measuring antidepressant prescribing practice in a health care system using administrative data: implications for quality measurement and improvement. Jt Comm J Qual Improv. 2000 Apr; 26(4):203-16.
Score: 0.006
-
Assessing quality in managed care: health plan reporting of HEDIS performance measures. Policy Brief Commonw Fund. 1998 Sep; (298):1-6.
Score: 0.005
-
How good is the quality of health care in the United States? Milbank Q. 1998; 76(4):517-63, 509.
Score: 0.005
-
The appropriateness of hysterectomy. A comparison of care in seven health plans. Health Maintenance Organization Quality of Care Consortium. JAMA. 1993 May 12; 269(18):2398-402.
Score: 0.004
-
HMO vs fee-for-service care of older persons with acute myocardial infarction. Am J Public Health. 1992 Dec; 82(12):1626-30.
Score: 0.004
-
Choosing quality of care measures based on the expected impact of improved care on health. Health Serv Res. 1992 Dec; 27(5):619-50.
Score: 0.004
-
A fair approach to comparing quality of care. Health Aff (Millwood). 1991; 10(1):62-75.
Score: 0.003
-
Functional status and well-being of patients with chronic conditions. Results from the Medical Outcomes Study. JAMA. 1989 Aug 18; 262(7):907-13.
Score: 0.003