Elizabeth McGlynn to Quality of Health Care
This is a "connection" page, showing publications Elizabeth McGlynn has written about Quality of Health Care.
Connection Strength
6.233
-
Measuring and Improving Quality in the US: Where Are We Today? J Am Board Fam Med. 2020 Sep-Oct; 33(Suppl):S28-S35.
Score: 0.608
-
Improving the Quality of U.S. Health Care - What Will It Take? N Engl J Med. 2020 Aug 27; 383(9):801-803.
Score: 0.608
-
Variations in the quality of care delivered to patients undergoing total knee replacement at 3 affiliated hospitals. Orthopedics. 2011 May 18; 34(5):356.
Score: 0.320
-
The challenge of measuring quality of care from the electronic health record. Am J Med Qual. 2009 Sep-Oct; 24(5):385-94.
Score: 0.279
-
A systematic review of health care efficiency measures. Health Serv Res. 2009 Jun; 44(3):784-805.
Score: 0.272
-
The quality of ambulatory care delivered to children in the United States. N Engl J Med. 2007 Oct 11; 357(15):1515-23.
Score: 0.249
-
Intended and unintended consequences: what should we really worry about? Med Care. 2007 Jan; 45(1):3-5.
Score: 0.236
-
Who is at greatest risk for receiving poor-quality health care? N Engl J Med. 2006 Mar 16; 354(11):1147-56.
Score: 0.223
-
The quality of health care delivered to adults in the United States. N Engl J Med. 2003 Jun 26; 348(26):2635-45.
Score: 0.185
-
Introduction and overview of the conceptual framework for a national quality measurement and reporting system. Med Care. 2003 Jan; 41(1 Suppl):I1-7.
Score: 0.179
-
An evidence-based national quality measurement and reporting system. Med Care. 2003 Jan; 41(1 Suppl):I8-15.
Score: 0.179
-
Establishing national goals for quality improvement. Med Care. 2003 Jan; 41(1 Suppl):I16-29.
Score: 0.179
-
Selecting common measures of quality and system performance. Med Care. 2003 Jan; 41(1 Suppl):I39-47.
Score: 0.179
-
Using performance measurement to drive improvement: a road map for change. Med Care. 2003 Jan; 41(1 Suppl):I48-60.
Score: 0.179
-
A research agenda to advance quality measurement and improvement. Med Care. 2003 Jan; 41(1 Suppl):I80-6.
Score: 0.179
-
Evaluating the quality of cancer care: development of cancer quality indicators for a global quality assessment tool. Cancer. 2000 Feb 01; 88(3):701-7.
Score: 0.146
-
Quality of care for women: where are we now and where are we headed? Womens Health Issues. 1999 Mar-Apr; 9(2):65-80; discussion 93-106.
Score: 0.137
-
Six challenges in measuring the quality of health care. Health Aff (Millwood). 1997 May-Jun; 16(3):7-21.
Score: 0.121
-
Development and Implementation of the Family Experiences With Coordination of Care Survey Quality Measures. Acad Pediatr. 2017 Nov - Dec; 17(8):863-870.
Score: 0.120
-
Strategies For Assessing Delivery System Innovations. Health Aff (Millwood). 2017 03 01; 36(3):408-416.
Score: 0.119
-
Fostering Transparency in Outcomes, Quality, Safety, and Costs. JAMA. 2016 Oct 25; 316(16):1661-1662.
Score: 0.116
-
Health system reform and quality. JAMA. 1996 Aug 14; 276(6):476-80.
Score: 0.115
-
Choosing chronic disease measures for HEDIS: conceptual framework and review of seven clinical areas. Manag Care Q. 1996; 4(3):54-77.
Score: 0.110
-
Assessing the quality of care for children. Prospects under health reform. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 1995 Apr; 149(4):359-68.
Score: 0.104
-
Cost implications of improving blood pressure management among U.S. adults. Health Serv Res. 2011 Aug; 46(4):1124-57.
Score: 0.078
-
Bending the curve through health reform implementation. Am J Manag Care. 2010 Nov; 16(11):804-12.
Score: 0.077
-
Associations between physician characteristics and quality of care. Arch Intern Med. 2010 Sep 13; 170(16):1442-9.
Score: 0.076
-
Cost profiles: should the focus be on individual physicians or physician groups? Health Aff (Millwood). 2010 Aug; 29(8):1532-8.
Score: 0.076
-
Efficiency and its measurement: what practitioners need to know. Am J Manag Care. 2009 Nov; 15(11):842-5.
Score: 0.072
-
Assessment of the scientific soundness of clinical performance measures: a field test of the National Committee for Quality Assurance's colorectal cancer screening measure. Arch Intern Med. 2008 Apr 28; 168(8):876-82.
Score: 0.065
-
Quality-of-care research in mental health: responding to the challenge. Inquiry. 1988; 25(1):157-70.
Score: 0.063
-
Quality by any other name?: a comparison of three profiling systems for assessing health care quality. Health Serv Res. 2007 Oct; 42(5):2070-87.
Score: 0.062
-
Relationship between number of medical conditions and quality of care. N Engl J Med. 2007 Jun 14; 356(24):2496-504.
Score: 0.061
-
How good is the quality of health care in the United States? 1998. Milbank Q. 2005; 83(4):843-95.
Score: 0.051
-
Comparison of quality of care for patients in the Veterans Health Administration and patients in a national sample. Ann Intern Med. 2004 Dec 21; 141(12):938-45.
Score: 0.051
-
Profiling the quality of care in twelve communities: results from the CQI study. Health Aff (Millwood). 2004 May-Jun; 23(3):247-56.
Score: 0.049
-
Defining and measuring quality of care: a perspective from US researchers. Int J Qual Health Care. 2000 Aug; 12(4):281-95.
Score: 0.038
-
Validation of New Care Coordination Quality Measures for Children with Medical Complexity. Acad Pediatr. 2018 07; 18(5):581-588.
Score: 0.032
-
The effect of managed care on primary care services for women. Womens Health Issues. 1998 Jan-Feb; 8(1):1-14; discussion 25-31.
Score: 0.032
-
How good is the quality of health care in the United States? Milbank Q. 1998; 76(4):517-63, 509.
Score: 0.032
-
Setting the context for measuring patient outcomes. New Dir Ment Health Serv. 1996; (71):19-32.
Score: 0.028
-
Focus groups highlight that many patients object to clinicians' focusing on costs. Health Aff (Millwood). 2013 Feb; 32(2):338-46.
Score: 0.022
-
HMO vs fee-for-service care of older persons with acute myocardial infarction. Am J Public Health. 1992 Dec; 82(12):1626-30.
Score: 0.022
-
Choosing quality of care measures based on the expected impact of improved care on health. Health Serv Res. 1992 Dec; 27(5):619-50.
Score: 0.022
-
Cost implications to health care payers of improving glucose management among adults with type 2 diabetes. Health Serv Res. 2011 Aug; 46(4):1158-79.
Score: 0.020
-
A fair approach to comparing quality of care. Health Aff (Millwood). 1991; 10(1):62-75.
Score: 0.019
-
The impact of health plan physician-tiering on access to care. J Gen Intern Med. 2011 Apr; 26(4):440-5.
Score: 0.019
-
Population-based assessments of ophthalmologic and audiologic follow-up in children with very low birth weight enrolled in Medicaid: a quality-of-care study. Pediatrics. 2008 Feb; 121(2):e278-85.
Score: 0.016
-
Quality of health care. Part 2: measuring quality of care. N Engl J Med. 1996 Sep 26; 335(13):966-70.
Score: 0.007