Michael Gould to Tomography, X-Ray Computed
This is a "connection" page, showing publications Michael Gould has written about Tomography, X-Ray Computed.
Connection Strength
7.697
-
The American Cancer Society National Lung Cancer Roundtable strategic plan: Optimizing strategies for lung nodule evaluation and management. Cancer. 2024 Dec 15; 130(24):4177-4187.
Score: 0.880
-
Methods for the Watch the Spot Trial. A Pragmatic Trial of More- versus Less-Intensive Strategies for Active Surveillance of Small Pulmonary Nodules. Ann Am Thorac Soc. 2019 12; 16(12):1567-1576.
Score: 0.629
-
Multilevel Barriers to the Successful Implementation of Lung Cancer Screening: Why Does It Have to Be So Hard? Ann Am Thorac Soc. 2017 Aug; 14(8):1261-1265.
Score: 0.535
-
Implementation of the Canadian CT Head Rule and Its Association With Use of Computed Tomography Among Patients With Head Injury. Ann Emerg Med. 2018 Jan; 71(1):54-63.e2.
Score: 0.534
-
Brain Imaging for Staging of Patients With Clinical Stage IA Non-small Cell Lung Cancer in the National Lung Screening Trial: Adherence With Recommendations From the Choosing Wisely Campaign. Chest. 2016 Apr; 149(4):943-50.
Score: 0.481
-
Lung Cancer Screening in Individuals with Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease. Finding the Sweet Spot. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2015 Nov 01; 192(9):1027-8.
Score: 0.474
-
Clinical practice. Lung-cancer screening with low-dose computed tomography. N Engl J Med. 2014 Nov 06; 371(19):1813-20.
Score: 0.443
-
CT screening for lung cancer. N Engl J Med. 2007 Feb 15; 356(7):743; author reply 746-7.
Score: 0.259
-
Test performance of positron emission tomography and computed tomography for mediastinal staging in patients with non-small-cell lung cancer: a meta-analysis. Ann Intern Med. 2003 Dec 02; 139(11):879-92.
Score: 0.208
-
Lung cancer screening debate. Chest. 2003 Feb; 123(2):653-4; author reply 654-5.
Score: 0.196
-
Is Lung Cancer Screening Reaching the People Who Are Most Likely to Benefit? JAMA Netw Open. 2022 11 01; 5(11):e2243171.
Score: 0.193
-
Guidelines for the Evaluation of Pulmonary Nodules Detected Incidentally or by Screening: A Survey of Radiologist Awareness, Agreement, and Adherence From the Watch the Spot Trial. J Am Coll Radiol. 2021 Apr; 18(4):545-553.
Score: 0.168
-
Safely and Effectively Evaluating Computed Tomography-detected Lung Lesions. Much Work to Be Done. Ann Am Thorac Soc. 2019 11; 16(11):1360-1362.
Score: 0.156
-
Monitoring Lung Cancer Screening Use and Outcomes at Four Cancer Research Network Sites. Ann Am Thorac Soc. 2017 Dec; 14(12):1827-1835.
Score: 0.137
-
The Importance of Being Adaptable: Developing Guidelines for Lung Nodule Evaluation in Asia. Chest. 2016 10; 150(4):763-765.
Score: 0.126
-
Factors Associated with a Positive Baseline Screening Exam Result in the National Lung Screening Trial. Ann Am Thorac Soc. 2016 09; 13(9):1568-74.
Score: 0.126
-
Use of posttreatment imaging and biomarkers in survivors of early-stage breast cancer: Inappropriate surveillance or necessary care? Cancer. 2016 Mar 15; 122(6):908-16.
Score: 0.119
-
Recent Trends in the Identification of Incidental Pulmonary Nodules. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2015 Nov 15; 192(10):1208-14.
Score: 0.119
-
Low-value care for acute sinusitis encounters: who's choosing wisely? Am J Manag Care. 2015 Jul; 21(7):479-85.
Score: 0.116
-
Attitudes about low-dose computed tomography screening for lung cancer: a survey of American Thoracic Society Clinicians. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2015 Feb 15; 191(4):483-6.
Score: 0.113
-
Components necessary for high-quality lung cancer screening: American College of Chest Physicians and American Thoracic Society Policy Statement. Chest. 2015 Feb; 147(2):295-303.
Score: 0.113
-
The utility of nodule volume in the context of malignancy prediction for small pulmonary nodules. Chest. 2014 Mar 01; 145(3):464-472.
Score: 0.106
-
Computed tomography screening for lung cancer. Ann Intern Med. 2013 Jul 16; 159(2):155-6.
Score: 0.101
-
Methods for staging non-small cell lung cancer: Diagnosis and management of lung cancer, 3rd ed: American College of Chest Physicians evidence-based clinical practice guidelines. Chest. 2013 May; 143(5 Suppl):e211S-e250S.
Score: 0.100
-
Evaluation of individuals with pulmonary nodules: when is it lung cancer? Diagnosis and management of lung cancer, 3rd ed: American College of Chest Physicians evidence-based clinical practice guidelines. Chest. 2013 May; 143(5 Suppl):e93S-e120S.
Score: 0.100
-
When the average applies to no one: personalized decision making about potential benefits of lung cancer screening. Ann Intern Med. 2012 Oct 16; 157(8):571-3.
Score: 0.096
-
Automated identification of patients with pulmonary nodules in an integrated health system using administrative health plan data, radiology reports, and natural language processing. J Thorac Oncol. 2012 Aug; 7(8):1257-62.
Score: 0.095
-
Benefits and harms of CT screening for lung cancer: a systematic review. JAMA. 2012 Jun 13; 307(22):2418-29.
Score: 0.094
-
Evaluation of screening-detected lung nodules: minimising the risk of unnecessary biopsy and surgery. Thorax. 2011 Apr; 66(4):277-9.
Score: 0.086
-
Timeliness across the continuum of care in veterans with lung cancer. J Thorac Oncol. 2008 Sep; 3(9):951-7.
Score: 0.072
-
Utility of CT for predicting pulmonary hypertension in patients with parenchymal lung disease: similar results, different conclusion? Chest. 2008 Apr; 133(4):1053-4; author reply 1054.
Score: 0.070
-
Timeliness of care in veterans with non-small cell lung cancer. Chest. 2008 May; 133(5):1167-73.
Score: 0.069
-
A comparison of the diagnostic accuracy of 18F-FDG PET and CT in the characterization of solitary pulmonary nodules. J Nucl Med. 2008 Feb; 49(2):179-85.
Score: 0.069
-
Computed tomography of abdominal carcinoid tumour. Br J Radiol. 1986 Sep; 59(705):881-5.
Score: 0.063
-
Idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis: challenges and opportunities for the clinician and investigator. Chest. 2005 Jan; 127(1):275-83.
Score: 0.056
-
Cost-effectiveness of alternative management strategies for patients with solitary pulmonary nodules. Ann Intern Med. 2003 May 06; 138(9):724-35.
Score: 0.050
-
Characteristics of Persons Screened for Lung Cancer in the United States : A Cohort Study. Ann Intern Med. 2022 11; 175(11):1501-1505.
Score: 0.048
-
Fleischner Society Guideline Recommendations for Incidentally Detected Pulmonary Nodules and the Probability of Lung Cancer. J Am Coll Radiol. 2022 Nov; 19(11):1226-1235.
Score: 0.048
-
Identification of benign pulmonary nodules by needle biopsy. Chest. 1998 Jan; 113(1):3-5.
Score: 0.034
-
Clinical Equipoise and Shared Decision-making in Pulmonary Nodule Management. A Survey of American Thoracic Society Clinicians. Ann Am Thorac Soc. 2017 Jun; 14(6):968-975.
Score: 0.033
-
Physician Assessment of Pretest Probability of Malignancy and Adherence With Guidelines for Pulmonary Nodule Evaluation. Chest. 2017 08; 152(2):263-270.
Score: 0.032
-
Use of [(18)F]Fluoro-2-deoxy-d-glucose Positron Emission Tomographic Imaging in the National Lung Screening Trial. Chest. 2016 09; 150(3):621-30.
Score: 0.031
-
Management of Pulmonary Nodules by Community Pulmonologists: A Multicenter Observational Study. Chest. 2015 Dec; 148(6):1405-1414.
Score: 0.030
-
An official American Thoracic Society/American College of Chest Physicians policy statement: implementation of low-dose computed tomography lung cancer screening programs in clinical practice. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2015 Oct 01; 192(7):881-91.
Score: 0.029
-
Lung cancer screening. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2015 Jan 01; 191(1):19-33.
Score: 0.028
-
Evidence for the treatment of patients with pulmonary nodules: when is it lung cancer?: ACCP evidence-based clinical practice guidelines (2nd edition). Chest. 2007 Sep; 132(3 Suppl):94S-107S.
Score: 0.017
-
Noninvasive staging of non-small cell lung cancer: ACCP evidenced-based clinical practice guidelines (2nd edition). Chest. 2007 Sep; 132(3 Suppl):178S-201S.
Score: 0.017