Jessica Chubak to Early Detection of Cancer
This is a "connection" page, showing publications Jessica Chubak has written about Early Detection of Cancer.
Connection Strength
4.558
-
Positive predictive value of cervical cancer screening results recommended for colposcopy by human papillomavirus vaccination status at 3 U.S. healthcare systems. Cancer Causes Control. 2025 Nov; 36(11):1549-1561.
Score: 0.657
-
Estimating Cancer Screening Sensitivity and Specificity Using Healthcare Utilization Data: Defining the Accuracy Assessment Interval. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2022 08 02; 31(8):1517-1520.
Score: 0.533
-
Hepatocellular Carcinoma Surveillance Among Patients With Cirrhosis in a Population-based Integrated Health Care Delivery System. J Clin Gastroenterol. 2017 Aug; 51(7):650-655.
Score: 0.377
-
Defining and measuring adherence to cancer screening. J Med Screen. 2016 12; 23(4):179-185.
Score: 0.342
-
Assessing the effectiveness of a cancer screening test in the presence of another screening modality. J Med Screen. 2015 Jun; 22(2):69-75.
Score: 0.314
-
Uptake and positive predictive value of fecal occult blood tests: A randomized controlled trial. Prev Med. 2013 Nov; 57(5):671-8.
Score: 0.288
-
Optimal Stopping Ages for Colorectal Cancer Screening. JAMA Netw Open. 2024 Dec 02; 7(12):e2451715.
Score: 0.157
-
Risk of Colorectal Cancer and Colorectal Cancer Mortality Beginning Ten Years after a Negative Colonoscopy, among Screen-Eligible Adults 76 to 85 Years Old. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2023 01 09; 32(1):37-45.
Score: 0.137
-
Association of Physician Adenoma Detection Rates With Postcolonoscopy Colorectal Cancer. JAMA. 2022 06 07; 327(21):2114-2122.
Score: 0.132
-
Evaluating Screening Participation, Follow-up, and Outcomes for Breast, Cervical, and Colorectal Cancer in the PROSPR Consortium. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2020 03 01; 112(3):238-246.
Score: 0.113
-
Long-term Risk of Colorectal Cancer and Related Death After Adenoma Removal in a Large, Community-based Population. Gastroenterology. 2020 03; 158(4):884-894.e5.
Score: 0.110
-
Financial Incentives to Increase Colorectal Cancer Screening Uptake and Decrease Disparities: A Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA Netw Open. 2019 07 03; 2(7):e196570.
Score: 0.108
-
A centralized mailed program with stepped increases of support increases time in compliance with colorectal cancer screening guidelines over 5 years: A randomized trial. Cancer. 2017 Nov 15; 123(22):4472-4480.
Score: 0.094
-
Influence of Age and Comorbidity on Colorectal Cancer Screening in the Elderly. Am J Prev Med. 2016 09; 51(3):e67-75.
Score: 0.087
-
Association Between Primary Care Visits and Colorectal Cancer Screening Outcomes in the Era of Population Health Outreach. J Gen Intern Med. 2016 10; 31(10):1190-7.
Score: 0.087
-
Colorectal Cancer Screening Rates Increased after Exposure to the Patient-Centered Medical Home (PCMH). J Am Board Fam Med. 2016 Mar-Apr; 29(2):191-200.
Score: 0.085
-
Impact of continued mailed fecal tests in the patient-centered medical home: Year 3 of the Systems of Support to Increase Colon Cancer Screening and Follow-Up randomized trial. Cancer. 2016 Jan 15; 122(2):312-21.
Score: 0.083
-
An economic evaluation of colorectal cancer screening in primary care practice. Am J Prev Med. 2015 Jun; 48(6):714-21.
Score: 0.081
-
Longitudinal predictors of colorectal cancer screening among participants in a randomized controlled trial. Prev Med. 2014 Sep; 66:123-30.
Score: 0.076
-
The colorectal cancer screening process in community settings: a conceptual model for the population-based research optimizing screening through personalized regimens consortium. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2014 Jul; 23(7):1147-58.
Score: 0.076
-
Time to screening in the systems of support to increase colorectal cancer screening trial. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2014 Aug; 23(8):1683-8.
Score: 0.076
-
Patterns of colorectal cancer screening uptake in newly eligible men and women. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2014 Jul; 23(7):1230-7.
Score: 0.075
-
Psychological distress after a positive fecal occult blood test result among members of an integrated healthcare delivery system. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2014 Jan; 23(1):154-9.
Score: 0.073
-
An automated intervention with stepped increases in support to increase uptake of colorectal cancer screening: a randomized trial. Ann Intern Med. 2013 Mar 05; 158(5 Pt 1):301-11.
Score: 0.069
-
Screening colonoscopy and risk for incident late-stage colorectal cancer diagnosis in average-risk adults: a nested case-control study. Ann Intern Med. 2013 Mar 05; 158(5 Pt 1):312-20.
Score: 0.069
-
Delivering Guideline-Concordant Care for Patients With High-Risk HPV and Normal Cytologic Findings. JAMA Netw Open. 2025 Jan 02; 8(1):e2454969.
Score: 0.039
-
Evaluating Different Approaches for Calculating Adenoma Detection Rate: Is Screening Colonoscopy the Gold Standard? Gastroenterology. 2023 09; 165(3):784-787.e4.
Score: 0.035
-
Factors associated with timely colposcopy following an abnormal cervical cancer test result. Prev Med. 2022 11; 164:107307.
Score: 0.034
-
Evaluation of Harms Reporting in U.S. Cancer Screening Guidelines. Ann Intern Med. 2022 11; 175(11):1582-1590.
Score: 0.034
-
Gaps in the screening process for women diagnosed with cervical cancer in four diverse US health care settings. Cancer Med. 2023 Feb; 12(3):3705-3717.
Score: 0.034
-
Evaluating and Improving Cancer Screening Process Quality in a Multilevel Context: The PROSPR II Consortium Design and Research Agenda. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2022 08 02; 31(8):1521-1531.
Score: 0.033
-
The association between colorectal sessile serrated adenomas/polyps and subsequent advanced colorectal neoplasia. Cancer Causes Control. 2019 Sep; 30(9):979-987.
Score: 0.027
-
Statistical Methods for Estimating the Cumulative Risk of Screening Mammography Outcomes. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2016 Mar; 25(3):513-20.
Score: 0.021