Header Logo

Connection

Amanda Petrik to Humans

Back to Details
This is a "connection" page, showing publications Amanda Petrik has written about Humans.
Amanda Petrik
Connection Strength
0.920
Humans
  1. Comparative Effectiveness of Text + Video vs Text Alone to Prompt Stool-Based Testing for Colorectal Cancer Screening. Perm J. 2025 12 15; 29(4):152-159.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.067
  2. A qualitative assessment of the acceptability of human papillomavirus self-sampling and informational materials among diverse populations. Cancer Med. 2024 Jul; 13(14):e70033.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.062
  3. Data Challenges in Identifying Patients Due for Colorectal Cancer Screening in Rural Clinics. J Am Board Fam Med. 2023 Feb 08; 36(1):118-129.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.056
  4. Development of a multivariable prediction model to identify patients unlikely to complete a colonoscopy following an abnormal FIT test in community clinics. BMC Health Serv Res. 2020 Nov 10; 20(1):1028.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.048
  5. Factors Influencing Implementation of a Colorectal Cancer Screening Improvement Program in Community Health Centers: an Applied Use of Configurational Comparative Methods. J Gen Intern Med. 2020 11; 35(Suppl 2):815-822.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.048
  6. Predictors of Colorectal Cancer Screening Prior to Implementation of a Large Pragmatic Trial in Federally Qualified Health Centers. J Community Health. 2018 02; 43(1):128-136.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.039
  7. The validation of electronic health records in accurately identifying patients eligible for colorectal cancer screening in safety net clinics. Fam Pract. 2016 12; 33(6):639-643.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.036
  8. Integrating clinical trial findings into practice through risk stratification: the case of heart failure management. Popul Health Manag. 2010 Jun; 13(3):123-9.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.023
  9. Temporal and geographic analyses of colorectal cancer screening during and after the COVID-19 pandemic in a federally qualified health center. PLoS One. 2026; 21(3):e0345248.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.017
  10. Generating the evidence base for implementation strategies targeting colorectal cancer screening in the accelerating colorectal cancer screening through implementation science (ACCSIS) research projects. BMC Public Health. 2026 Jan 24; 26(1):576.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.017
  11. Co-creating HPV Vaccination Messages for Rural Washington: Application of a Boot Camp Translation Approach. Health Educ Behav. 2026 Aug; 53(4):367-376.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.017
  12. Financial Navigation for People Newly Diagnosed With Cancer: Primary Outcomes From the Cancer Financial Experience Randomized Trial. JCO Oncol Pract. 2025 Dec; 21(12):1817-1829.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.017
  13. Community-clinic partnership to address social needs and improve colorectal cancer screening outcomes: The PRIME stepped-wedge study. Contemp Clin Trials. 2025 Oct; 157:108051.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.017
  14. Mailed Outreach and Patient Navigation for Colorectal Cancer Screening Among Rural Medicaid Enrollees: A Cluster Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA Netw Open. 2025 Mar 03; 8(3):e250928.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.016
  15. Harmonizing data across the accelerating colorectal cancer screening and follow-up through implementation science (ACCSIS) program to enhance data quality and promote data sharing. BMC Health Serv Res. 2024 Nov 06; 24(1):1356.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.016
  16. Evaluating the Reach of a Patient Navigation Program for Follow-up Colonoscopy in a Large Federally Qualified Health Center. Cancer Prev Res (Phila). 2024 Jul 02; 17(7):325-333.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.015
  17. Effort Required and Lessons Learned From Recruiting Health Plans and Rural Primary Care Practices for a Cancer Screening Outreach Study. J Prim Care Community Health. 2024 Jan-Dec; 15:21501319241259915.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.015
  18. Effectiveness and Cost of an Enhanced Mailed Fecal Test Outreach Colorectal Cancer Screening Program: Findings from the PROMPT Stepped-Wedge Trial. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2023 11 01; 32(11):1608-1616.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.015
  19. The Cancer Financial Experience (CAFÉ) study: randomized controlled trial of a financial navigation intervention to address cancer-related financial hardship. Trials. 2022 May 13; 23(1):402.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.013
  20. Clinic Factors Associated With Mailed Fecal Immunochemical Test (FIT) Completion: The Difference-Making Role of Support Staff. Ann Fam Med. 2022 Mar-Apr; 20(2):123-129.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.013
  21. Colonoscopy Following an Abnormal Fecal Test Result from an Annual Colorectal Cancer Screening Program in a Federally Qualified Health Center. J Prim Care Community Health. 2022 Jan-Dec; 13:21501319221138423.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.013
  22. Follow-up colonoscopy after an abnormal stool-based colorectal cancer screening result: analysis of steps in the colonoscopy completion process. BMC Gastroenterol. 2021 Sep 28; 21(1):356.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.013
  23. The influence of multi-morbidities on colorectal cancer screening recommendations and completion. Cancer Causes Control. 2021 May; 32(5):555-565.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.012
  24. Barriers and Facilitators to Timely Colonoscopy Completion for Safety Net Clinic Patients. Am J Health Behav. 2020 07 01; 44(4):460-472.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.012
  25. First-year implementation of mailed FIT colorectal cancer screening programs in two Medicaid/Medicare health insurance plans: qualitative learnings from health plan quality improvement staff and leaders. BMC Health Serv Res. 2020 Feb 21; 20(1):132.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.011
  26. Prospective Cohort study of Predictors of Follow-Up Diagnostic Colonoscopy from a Pragmatic Trial of FIT Screening. Sci Rep. 2020 02 12; 10(1):2441.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.011
  27. Moderators of the effectiveness of an intervention to increase colorectal cancer screening through mailed fecal immunochemical test kits: results from a pragmatic randomized trial. Trials. 2020 Jan 15; 21(1):91.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.011
  28. Patient randomized trial of a targeted navigation program to improve rates of follow-up colonoscopy in community health centers. Contemp Clin Trials. 2020 02; 89:105920.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.011
  29. Direct-to-member mailed colorectal cancer screening outreach for Medicaid and Medicare enrollees: Implementation and effectiveness outcomes from the BeneFIT study. Cancer. 2020 02 01; 126(3):540-548.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.011
  30. Patient-Refined Messaging for a Mailed Colorectal Cancer Screening Program: Findings from the PROMPT Study. J Am Board Fam Med. 2019 May-Jun; 32(3):318-328.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.011
  31. A Survey of Provider Attitudes, Beliefs, and Perceived Barriers Regarding a Centralized Direct-Mail Colorectal Cancer Screening Approach at Community Health Centers. J Prim Care Community Health. 2019 Jan-Dec; 10:2150132719890950.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.011
  32. Implementation successes and challenges in participating in a pragmatic study to improve colon cancer screening: perspectives of health center leaders. Transl Behav Med. 2017 09; 7(3):557-566.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.010
  33. Applying the Plan-Do-Study-Act (PDSA) approach to a large pragmatic study involving safety net clinics. BMC Health Serv Res. 2017 06 19; 17(1):411.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.009
  34. Predicting 5-Year Risk of RRT in Stage 3 or 4 CKD: Development and External Validation. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2017 01 06; 12(1):87-94.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.009
  35. Timeliness of Colonoscopy After Abnormal Fecal Test Results in a Safety Net Practice. J Community Health. 2016 08; 41(4):864-70.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.009
  36. Predicting the Risk of Clostridium difficile Infection upon Admission: A Score to Identify Patients for Antimicrobial Stewardship Efforts. Perm J. 2016; 20(1):20-5.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.009
  37. Systolic BP and Mortality in Older Adults with CKD. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2015 Sep 04; 10(9):1553-9.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.008
  38. Predicting mortality in older adults with kidney disease: a pragmatic prediction model. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2015 Mar; 63(3):508-15.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.008
  39. Predicting the risk of Clostridium difficile infection following an outpatient visit: development and external validation of a pragmatic, prognostic risk score. Clin Microbiol Infect. 2015 Mar; 21(3):256-62.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.008
  40. Clinical perspectives on colorectal cancer screening at Latino-serving federally qualified health centers. Health Educ Behav. 2015 Feb; 42(1):26-31.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.008
  41. Strategies and Opportunities to STOP Colon Cancer in Priority Populations: design of a cluster-randomized pragmatic trial. Contemp Clin Trials. 2014 Jul; 38(2):344-9.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.008
  42. Individuality of the plasma sodium concentration. Am J Physiol Renal Physiol. 2014 Jun 15; 306(12):F1534-43.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.008
  43. Advantages of wordless instructions on how to complete a fecal immunochemical test: lessons from patient advisory council members of a federally qualified health center. J Cancer Educ. 2014 Mar; 29(1):86-90.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.008
  44. Strategies and opportunities to STOP colon cancer in priority populations: pragmatic pilot study design and outcomes. BMC Cancer. 2014 Feb 26; 14:55.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.008
  45. Perceptions of under and overutilization of cervical cancer screening services at Latino-serving community health centers. J Community Health. 2013 Oct; 38(5):915-8.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.007
  46. Prescription opioids for back pain and use of medications for erectile dysfunction. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2013 May 15; 38(11):909-15.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.007
  47. Predicting costs of care in heart failure patients. BMC Health Serv Res. 2012 Nov 30; 12:434.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.007
  48. Clinician's use of automated reports of estimated glomerular filtration rate: a qualitative study. BMC Nephrol. 2012 Nov 23; 13:154.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.007
  49. Correlates of higher-dose opioid medication use for low back pain in primary care. J Pain. 2012 Nov; 13(11):1131-8.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.007
  50. Should measuring haemoglobin among chronic kidney disease patients be a performance measure? J Evid Based Med. 2012 Nov; 5(4):194-204.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.007
  51. Epidemiology and healthcare costs of incident Clostridium difficile infections identified in the outpatient healthcare setting. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2012 Oct; 33(10):1031-8.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.007
  52. Clostridium difficile infection, Colorado and the northwestern United States, 2007. Emerg Infect Dis. 2012 Jun; 18(6):960-2.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.007
  53. Proteinuria among patients with chronic kidney disease: a performance measure for improving patient outcomes. Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf. 2012 Jun; 38(6):277-82.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.007
  54. Predicting chronic kidney disease outcomes: are two estimated glomerular filtration rates better than one? Popul Health Manag. 2012 Apr; 15(2):113-8.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.007
  55. Opioids for back pain patients: primary care prescribing patterns and use of services. J Am Board Fam Med. 2011 Nov-Dec; 24(6):717-27.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.006
  56. An economic evaluation of a laboratory monitoring program for renin-angiotensin system agents. Med Decis Making. 2011 Mar-Apr; 31(2):315-24.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.006
  57. Systolic blood pressure and mortality among older community-dwelling adults with CKD. Am J Kidney Dis. 2010 Dec; 56(6):1062-71.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.006
  58. Predicting the risk of hyperkalemia in patients with chronic kidney disease starting lisinopril. Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2010 Mar; 19(3):266-72.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.006
  59. Outcomes predicted by phosphorous in chronic kidney disease: a retrospective CKD-inception cohort study. Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2010 Jan; 25(1):166-74.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.005
  60. Comparison of renal replacement therapy and mortality using 1 versus 2 estimated glomerular filtration rates. Popul Health Manag. 2009 Jun; 12(3):149-55.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.005
  61. Effect of anaemia on mortality, cardiovascular hospitalizations and end-stage renal disease among patients with chronic kidney disease. Nephrology (Carlton). 2009 Apr; 14(2):240-6.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.005
  62. An outreach program improved osteoporosis management after a fracture. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2007 Sep; 55(9):1464-9.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.005
  63. Using web-based screening to enhance efficiency of HMO clinical trial recruitment in women aged forty and older. Clin Trials. 2007; 4(1):102-5.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.005

© 2026 Kaiser Permanente

Your Privacy Choices