Amanda Petrik to Early Detection of Cancer
This is a "connection" page, showing publications Amanda Petrik has written about Early Detection of Cancer.
Connection Strength
5.212
-
Comparative Effectiveness of Text + Video vs Text Alone to Prompt Stool-Based Testing for Colorectal Cancer Screening. Perm J. 2025 12 15; 29(4):152-159.
Score: 0.621
-
Data Challenges in Identifying Patients Due for Colorectal Cancer Screening in Rural Clinics. J Am Board Fam Med. 2023 Feb 08; 36(1):118-129.
Score: 0.517
-
Development of a multivariable prediction model to identify patients unlikely to complete a colonoscopy following an abnormal FIT test in community clinics. BMC Health Serv Res. 2020 Nov 10; 20(1):1028.
Score: 0.442
-
Predictors of Colorectal Cancer Screening Prior to Implementation of a Large Pragmatic Trial in Federally Qualified Health Centers. J Community Health. 2018 02; 43(1):128-136.
Score: 0.365
-
The validation of electronic health records in accurately identifying patients eligible for colorectal cancer screening in safety net clinics. Fam Pract. 2016 12; 33(6):639-643.
Score: 0.328
-
Temporal and geographic analyses of colorectal cancer screening during and after the COVID-19 pandemic in a federally qualified health center. PLoS One. 2026; 21(3):e0345248.
Score: 0.160
-
Generating the evidence base for implementation strategies targeting colorectal cancer screening in the accelerating colorectal cancer screening through implementation science (ACCSIS) research projects. BMC Public Health. 2026 Jan 24; 26(1):576.
Score: 0.159
-
Community-clinic partnership to address social needs and improve colorectal cancer screening outcomes: The PRIME stepped-wedge study. Contemp Clin Trials. 2025 Oct; 157:108051.
Score: 0.154
-
Mailed Outreach and Patient Navigation for Colorectal Cancer Screening Among Rural Medicaid Enrollees: A Cluster Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA Netw Open. 2025 Mar 03; 8(3):e250928.
Score: 0.149
-
Harmonizing data across the accelerating colorectal cancer screening and follow-up through implementation science (ACCSIS) program to enhance data quality and promote data sharing. BMC Health Serv Res. 2024 Nov 06; 24(1):1356.
Score: 0.146
-
Evaluating the Reach of a Patient Navigation Program for Follow-up Colonoscopy in a Large Federally Qualified Health Center. Cancer Prev Res (Phila). 2024 Jul 02; 17(7):325-333.
Score: 0.142
-
A qualitative assessment of the acceptability of human papillomavirus self-sampling and informational materials among diverse populations. Cancer Med. 2024 Jul; 13(14):e70033.
Score: 0.142
-
Effort Required and Lessons Learned From Recruiting Health Plans and Rural Primary Care Practices for a Cancer Screening Outreach Study. J Prim Care Community Health. 2024 Jan-Dec; 15:21501319241259915.
Score: 0.137
-
Effectiveness and Cost of an Enhanced Mailed Fecal Test Outreach Colorectal Cancer Screening Program: Findings from the PROMPT Stepped-Wedge Trial. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2023 11 01; 32(11):1608-1616.
Score: 0.136
-
Colonoscopy Following an Abnormal Fecal Test Result from an Annual Colorectal Cancer Screening Program in a Federally Qualified Health Center. J Prim Care Community Health. 2022 Jan-Dec; 13:21501319221138423.
Score: 0.120
-
Follow-up colonoscopy after an abnormal stool-based colorectal cancer screening result: analysis of steps in the colonoscopy completion process. BMC Gastroenterol. 2021 Sep 28; 21(1):356.
Score: 0.117
-
The influence of multi-morbidities on colorectal cancer screening recommendations and completion. Cancer Causes Control. 2021 May; 32(5):555-565.
Score: 0.113
-
Factors Influencing Implementation of a Colorectal Cancer Screening Improvement Program in Community Health Centers: an Applied Use of Configurational Comparative Methods. J Gen Intern Med. 2020 11; 35(Suppl 2):815-822.
Score: 0.110
-
Barriers and Facilitators to Timely Colonoscopy Completion for Safety Net Clinic Patients. Am J Health Behav. 2020 07 01; 44(4):460-472.
Score: 0.108
-
First-year implementation of mailed FIT colorectal cancer screening programs in two Medicaid/Medicare health insurance plans: qualitative learnings from health plan quality improvement staff and leaders. BMC Health Serv Res. 2020 Feb 21; 20(1):132.
Score: 0.105
-
Patient randomized trial of a targeted navigation program to improve rates of follow-up colonoscopy in community health centers. Contemp Clin Trials. 2020 02; 89:105920.
Score: 0.104
-
Direct-to-member mailed colorectal cancer screening outreach for Medicaid and Medicare enrollees: Implementation and effectiveness outcomes from the BeneFIT study. Cancer. 2020 02 01; 126(3):540-548.
Score: 0.103
-
Patient-Refined Messaging for a Mailed Colorectal Cancer Screening Program: Findings from the PROMPT Study. J Am Board Fam Med. 2019 May-Jun; 32(3):318-328.
Score: 0.099
-
Implementation successes and challenges in participating in a pragmatic study to improve colon cancer screening: perspectives of health center leaders. Transl Behav Med. 2017 09; 7(3):557-566.
Score: 0.089
-
Applying the Plan-Do-Study-Act (PDSA) approach to a large pragmatic study involving safety net clinics. BMC Health Serv Res. 2017 06 19; 17(1):411.
Score: 0.087
-
Timeliness of Colonoscopy After Abnormal Fecal Test Results in a Safety Net Practice. J Community Health. 2016 08; 41(4):864-70.
Score: 0.082
-
Clinical perspectives on colorectal cancer screening at Latino-serving federally qualified health centers. Health Educ Behav. 2015 Feb; 42(1):26-31.
Score: 0.071
-
Strategies and Opportunities to STOP Colon Cancer in Priority Populations: design of a cluster-randomized pragmatic trial. Contemp Clin Trials. 2014 Jul; 38(2):344-9.
Score: 0.071
-
Strategies and opportunities to STOP colon cancer in priority populations: pragmatic pilot study design and outcomes. BMC Cancer. 2014 Feb 26; 14:55.
Score: 0.069
-
Perceptions of under and overutilization of cervical cancer screening services at Latino-serving community health centers. J Community Health. 2013 Oct; 38(5):915-8.
Score: 0.068
-
Clinic Factors Associated With Mailed Fecal Immunochemical Test (FIT) Completion: The Difference-Making Role of Support Staff. Ann Fam Med. 2022 Mar-Apr; 20(2):123-129.
Score: 0.030
-
Prospective Cohort study of Predictors of Follow-Up Diagnostic Colonoscopy from a Pragmatic Trial of FIT Screening. Sci Rep. 2020 02 12; 10(1):2441.
Score: 0.026
-
A Survey of Provider Attitudes, Beliefs, and Perceived Barriers Regarding a Centralized Direct-Mail Colorectal Cancer Screening Approach at Community Health Centers. J Prim Care Community Health. 2019 Jan-Dec; 10:2150132719890950.
Score: 0.024
-
Advantages of wordless instructions on how to complete a fecal immunochemical test: lessons from patient advisory council members of a federally qualified health center. J Cancer Educ. 2014 Mar; 29(1):86-90.
Score: 0.017