Amanda Petrik to Colorectal Neoplasms
This is a "connection" page, showing publications Amanda Petrik has written about Colorectal Neoplasms.
Connection Strength
4.384
-
Data Challenges in Identifying Patients Due for Colorectal Cancer Screening in Rural Clinics. J Am Board Fam Med. 2023 Feb 08; 36(1):118-129.
Score: 0.543
-
Development of a multivariable prediction model to identify patients unlikely to complete a colonoscopy following an abnormal FIT test in community clinics. BMC Health Serv Res. 2020 Nov 10; 20(1):1028.
Score: 0.465
-
Factors Influencing Implementation of a Colorectal Cancer Screening Improvement Program in Community Health Centers: an Applied Use of Configurational Comparative Methods. J Gen Intern Med. 2020 11; 35(Suppl 2):815-822.
Score: 0.464
-
Predictors of Colorectal Cancer Screening Prior to Implementation of a Large Pragmatic Trial in Federally Qualified Health Centers. J Community Health. 2018 02; 43(1):128-136.
Score: 0.384
-
The validation of electronic health records in accurately identifying patients eligible for colorectal cancer screening in safety net clinics. Fam Pract. 2016 12; 33(6):639-643.
Score: 0.346
-
Harmonizing data across the accelerating colorectal cancer screening and follow-up through implementation science (ACCSIS) program to enhance data quality and promote data sharing. BMC Health Serv Res. 2024 Nov 06; 24(1):1356.
Score: 0.153
-
Evaluating the Reach of a Patient Navigation Program for Follow-up Colonoscopy in a Large Federally Qualified Health Center. Cancer Prev Res (Phila). 2024 Jul 02; 17(7):325-333.
Score: 0.150
-
Effectiveness and Cost of an Enhanced Mailed Fecal Test Outreach Colorectal Cancer Screening Program: Findings from the PROMPT Stepped-Wedge Trial. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2023 11 01; 32(11):1608-1616.
Score: 0.143
-
Clinic Factors Associated With Mailed Fecal Immunochemical Test (FIT) Completion: The Difference-Making Role of Support Staff. Ann Fam Med. 2022 Mar-Apr; 20(2):123-129.
Score: 0.127
-
Colonoscopy Following an Abnormal Fecal Test Result from an Annual Colorectal Cancer Screening Program in a Federally Qualified Health Center. J Prim Care Community Health. 2022 Jan-Dec; 13:21501319221138423.
Score: 0.126
-
Follow-up colonoscopy after an abnormal stool-based colorectal cancer screening result: analysis of steps in the colonoscopy completion process. BMC Gastroenterol. 2021 Sep 28; 21(1):356.
Score: 0.124
-
The influence of multi-morbidities on colorectal cancer screening recommendations and completion. Cancer Causes Control. 2021 May; 32(5):555-565.
Score: 0.119
-
Barriers and Facilitators to Timely Colonoscopy Completion for Safety Net Clinic Patients. Am J Health Behav. 2020 07 01; 44(4):460-472.
Score: 0.113
-
First-year implementation of mailed FIT colorectal cancer screening programs in two Medicaid/Medicare health insurance plans: qualitative learnings from health plan quality improvement staff and leaders. BMC Health Serv Res. 2020 Feb 21; 20(1):132.
Score: 0.111
-
Prospective Cohort study of Predictors of Follow-Up Diagnostic Colonoscopy from a Pragmatic Trial of FIT Screening. Sci Rep. 2020 02 12; 10(1):2441.
Score: 0.110
-
Moderators of the effectiveness of an intervention to increase colorectal cancer screening through mailed fecal immunochemical test kits: results from a pragmatic randomized trial. Trials. 2020 Jan 15; 21(1):91.
Score: 0.110
-
Patient randomized trial of a targeted navigation program to improve rates of follow-up colonoscopy in community health centers. Contemp Clin Trials. 2020 02; 89:105920.
Score: 0.109
-
Direct-to-member mailed colorectal cancer screening outreach for Medicaid and Medicare enrollees: Implementation and effectiveness outcomes from the BeneFIT study. Cancer. 2020 02 01; 126(3):540-548.
Score: 0.108
-
Patient-Refined Messaging for a Mailed Colorectal Cancer Screening Program: Findings from the PROMPT Study. J Am Board Fam Med. 2019 May-Jun; 32(3):318-328.
Score: 0.105
-
A Survey of Provider Attitudes, Beliefs, and Perceived Barriers Regarding a Centralized Direct-Mail Colorectal Cancer Screening Approach at Community Health Centers. J Prim Care Community Health. 2019 Jan-Dec; 10:2150132719890950.
Score: 0.102
-
Applying the Plan-Do-Study-Act (PDSA) approach to a large pragmatic study involving safety net clinics. BMC Health Serv Res. 2017 06 19; 17(1):411.
Score: 0.092
-
Clinical perspectives on colorectal cancer screening at Latino-serving federally qualified health centers. Health Educ Behav. 2015 Feb; 42(1):26-31.
Score: 0.075
-
Strategies and Opportunities to STOP Colon Cancer in Priority Populations: design of a cluster-randomized pragmatic trial. Contemp Clin Trials. 2014 Jul; 38(2):344-9.
Score: 0.075
-
Advantages of wordless instructions on how to complete a fecal immunochemical test: lessons from patient advisory council members of a federally qualified health center. J Cancer Educ. 2014 Mar; 29(1):86-90.
Score: 0.073
-
Effort Required and Lessons Learned From Recruiting Health Plans and Rural Primary Care Practices for a Cancer Screening Outreach Study. J Prim Care Community Health. 2024 Jan-Dec; 15:21501319241259915.
Score: 0.036
-
Timeliness of Colonoscopy After Abnormal Fecal Test Results in a Safety Net Practice. J Community Health. 2016 08; 41(4):864-70.
Score: 0.022