Heidi Nelson to Humans
This is a "connection" page, showing publications Heidi Nelson has written about Humans.
Connection Strength
3.322
-
ASO Visual Abstract: National Cancer Database Conforms with Standardized Framework for Registry and Data Quality. Ann Surg Oncol. 2024 Sep; 31(9):5589-5590.
Score: 0.069
-
ASO Author Reflections: The Commission on Cancer's Role in Quality Procedures that Govern the National Cancer Database. Ann Surg Oncol. 2024 Sep; 31(9):5585-5586.
Score: 0.068
-
The National Cancer Database Conforms to the Standardized Framework for Registry and Data Quality. Ann Surg Oncol. 2024 Sep; 31(9):5546-5559.
Score: 0.068
-
Survival Among Patients With High-Risk Gastrointestinal Cancers During the COVID-19 Pandemic. JAMA Netw Open. 2024 Mar 04; 7(3):e240160.
Score: 0.067
-
National Cancer Database Reports Ongoing Disruptions in Cancer Diagnoses in 2021. Ann Surg Oncol. 2024 Feb; 31(2):729-730.
Score: 0.066
-
Unintended Pregnancy and Maternal and Infant Health Outcomes-Reply. JAMA. 2023 03 07; 329(9):765-766.
Score: 0.062
-
Associations of Unintended Pregnancy With Maternal and Infant Health Outcomes: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. JAMA. 2022 11 01; 328(17):1714-1729.
Score: 0.061
-
Twenty-Five Years of Cancer Follow-Up; Is the Data Worth the Effort? Ann Surg Oncol. 2022 Feb; 29(2):828-836.
Score: 0.057
-
Well-Woman Chart Is Useful in Guiding Preventive Care. Am Fam Physician. 2021 07 01; 104(1):9-10.
Score: 0.055
-
American College of Surgeons Efforts in Support of Value-Based Metrics. JAMA Oncol. 2021 02 01; 7(2):307-308.
Score: 0.054
-
Effectiveness of Patient Navigation to Increase Cancer Screening in Populations Adversely Affected by Health Disparities: a Meta-analysis. J Gen Intern Med. 2020 10; 35(10):3026-3035.
Score: 0.052
-
Screening for Anxiety in Adolescent and Adult Women: A Systematic Review for the Women's Preventive Services Initiative. Ann Intern Med. 2020 07 07; 173(1):29-41.
Score: 0.052
-
NASA-Task Load Index Differentiates Surgical Approach: Opportunities for Improvement in Colon and Rectal Surgery. Ann Surg. 2020 05; 271(5):906-912.
Score: 0.051
-
NASA-TLX Assessment of Surgeon Workload Variation Across Specialties. Ann Surg. 2020 04; 271(4):686-692.
Score: 0.051
-
Use of an Online Breast Cancer Risk Assessment and Patient Decision Aid in Primary Care Practices. J Womens Health (Larchmt). 2020 06; 29(6):763-769.
Score: 0.051
-
Achieving Health Equity in Preventive Services: A Systematic Review for a National Institutes of Health Pathways to Prevention Workshop. Ann Intern Med. 2020 02 18; 172(4):258-271.
Score: 0.050
-
Response to Comment on "NASATLX Assessment of Surgeon Workload Variation Across Specialties". Ann Surg. 2019 12; 270(6):e86-e87.
Score: 0.050
-
Medication Use for the Risk Reduction of Primary Breast Cancer in Women: Updated Evidence Report and Systematic Review for the US Preventive Services Task Force. JAMA. 2019 09 03; 322(9):868-886.
Score: 0.049
-
Risk Assessment, Genetic Counseling, and Genetic Testing for BRCA-Related Cancer in Women: Updated Evidence Report and Systematic Review for the US Preventive Services Task Force. JAMA. 2019 08 20; 322(7):666-685.
Score: 0.049
-
Surgeon Workload in Colorectal Surgery: Perceived Drivers of Procedural Difficulty. J Surg Res. 2020 01; 245:57-63.
Score: 0.049
-
Incident Cases Captured in the National Cancer Database Compared with Those in U.S. Population Based Central Cancer Registries in 2012-2014. Ann Surg Oncol. 2019 Jun; 26(6):1604-1612.
Score: 0.047
-
Assessment of a Personalized Approach to Predicting Postprandial Glycemic Responses to Food Among Individuals Without Diabetes. JAMA Netw Open. 2019 02 01; 2(2):e188102.
Score: 0.047
-
Screening for Urinary Incontinence in Women: A Systematic Review for the Women's Preventive Services Initiative. Ann Intern Med. 2018 09 04; 169(5):311-319.
Score: 0.045
-
Evidence in Favor of Standard Surgical Treatment for Rectal Cancer. JAMA Oncol. 2017 07 01; 3(7):885-886.
Score: 0.042
-
Suicide Risk Assessment and Prevention: A Systematic Review Focusing on Veterans. Psychiatr Serv. 2017 Oct 01; 68(10):1003-1015.
Score: 0.042
-
Safety and Feasibility of Minimally Invasive Inguinal Lymph Node Dissection in Patients With Melanoma (SAFE-MILND): Report of a Prospective Multi-institutional Trial. Ann Surg. 2017 01; 265(1):192-196.
Score: 0.041
-
Screening for Syphilis: Updated Evidence Report and Systematic Review for the US Preventive Services Task Force. JAMA. 2016 Jun 07; 315(21):2328-37.
Score: 0.039
-
Mammography Screening and Overdiagnosis. JAMA Oncol. 2016 Feb; 2(2):261-2.
Score: 0.038
-
Effectiveness of Breast Cancer Screening: Systematic Review and Meta-analysis to Update the 2009 U.S. Preventive Services Task Force Recommendation. Ann Intern Med. 2016 Feb 16; 164(4):244-55.
Score: 0.038
-
Harms of Breast Cancer Screening: Systematic Review to Update the 2009 U.S. Preventive Services Task Force Recommendation. Ann Intern Med. 2016 Feb 16; 164(4):256-67.
Score: 0.038
-
Factors Associated With Rates of False-Positive and False-Negative Results From Digital Mammography Screening: An Analysis of Registry Data. Ann Intern Med. 2016 Feb 16; 164(4):226-35.
Score: 0.038
-
Treatment of Myalgic Encephalomyelitis/Chronic Fatigue Syndrome. Ann Intern Med. 2015 Dec 01; 163(11):888.
Score: 0.038
-
Mammography Decision Aid Reduces Decisional Conflict for Women in Their Forties Considering Screening. J Womens Health (Larchmt). 2015 Dec; 24(12):1013-20.
Score: 0.037
-
Young Age and Aggressive Treatment in Colon Cancer. JAMA. 2015 Aug 11; 314(6):613-4.
Score: 0.037
-
Mammography Screening in a Large Health System Following the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force Recommendations and the Affordable Care Act. PLoS One. 2015; 10(6):e0131903.
Score: 0.037
-
Diagnostic Methods for Myalgic Encephalomyelitis/Chronic Fatigue Syndrome: A Systematic Review for a National Institutes of Health Pathways to Prevention Workshop. Ann Intern Med. 2015 Jun 16; 162(12):834-40.
Score: 0.036
-
Treatment of Myalgic Encephalomyelitis/Chronic Fatigue Syndrome: A Systematic Review for a National Institutes of Health Pathways to Prevention Workshop. Ann Intern Med. 2015 Jun 16; 162(12):841-50.
Score: 0.036
-
Screening for gonorrhea and Chlamydia: a systematic review for the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force. Ann Intern Med. 2014 Dec 16; 161(12):884-93.
Score: 0.035
-
Risk assessment, genetic counseling, and genetic testing for BRCA-related cancer in women: a systematic review to update the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force recommendation. Ann Intern Med. 2014 Feb 18; 160(4):255-66.
Score: 0.033
-
Rates and indications for surgical breast biopsies in a community-based health system. Am J Surg. 2014 Apr; 207(4):499-503.
Score: 0.033
-
Use of medications to reduce risk for primary breast cancer: a systematic review for the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force. Ann Intern Med. 2013 Apr 16; 158(8):604-14.
Score: 0.031
-
Behavioral interventions and counseling to prevent child abuse and neglect: a systematic review to update the US Preventive services task force recommendation. Ann Intern Med. 2013 Feb 05; 158(3):179-90.
Score: 0.031
-
Menopausal hormone therapy and primary prevention. Ann Intern Med. 2013 Jan 15; 158(2):141.
Score: 0.031
-
Menopausal hormone therapy for the primary prevention of chronic conditions: a systematic review to update the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force recommendations. Ann Intern Med. 2012 Jul 17; 157(2):104-13.
Score: 0.030
-
Screening women for intimate partner violence: a systematic review to update the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force recommendation. Ann Intern Med. 2012 Jun 05; 156(11):796-808, W-279, W-280, W-281, W-282.
Score: 0.029
-
Risk factors for breast cancer for women aged 40 to 49 years: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Ann Intern Med. 2012 May 01; 156(9):635-48.
Score: 0.029
-
Screening for osteoporosis: an update for the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force. Ann Intern Med. 2010 Jul 20; 153(2):99-111.
Score: 0.026
-
Systematic review: comparative effectiveness of medications to reduce risk for primary breast cancer. Ann Intern Med. 2009 Nov 17; 151(10):703-15, W-226-35.
Score: 0.025
-
Screening for breast cancer: an update for the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force. Ann Intern Med. 2009 Nov 17; 151(10):727-37, W237-42.
Score: 0.025
-
Laparoscopic-assisted proctectomy for rectal cancer: on trial. Ann Surg Oncol. 2008 Sep; 15(9):2357-9.
Score: 0.023
-
Universal newborn hearing screening: systematic review to update the 2001 US Preventive Services Task Force Recommendation. Pediatrics. 2008 Jul; 122(1):e266-76.
Score: 0.023
-
Menopause. Lancet. 2008 Mar 01; 371(9614):760-70.
Score: 0.022
-
Screening and treatment for lipid disorders in children and adolescents: systematic evidence review for the US Preventive Services Task Force. Pediatrics. 2007 Jul; 120(1):e189-214.
Score: 0.021
-
Estimating risk of breast cancer in carriers of BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutations: a meta-analytic approach. Stat Med. 2007 Apr 15; 26(8):1775-87.
Score: 0.021
-
The surgeon and adjuvant therapy for stage II colon cancer. Ann Surg Oncol. 2007 Feb; 14(2):272-3.
Score: 0.020
-
Complementary and alternative therapies for the management of menopause-related symptoms: a systematic evidence review. Arch Intern Med. 2006 Jul 24; 166(14):1453-65.
Score: 0.020
-
Nonhormonal therapies for menopausal hot flashes: systematic review and meta-analysis. JAMA. 2006 May 03; 295(17):2057-71.
Score: 0.019
-
Screening for speech and language delay in preschool children: systematic evidence review for the US Preventive Services Task Force. Pediatrics. 2006 Feb; 117(2):e298-319.
Score: 0.019
-
Minimally invasive surgery for colorectal carcinoma. Ann Surg Oncol. 2005 Dec; 12(12):960-70.
Score: 0.019
-
Genetic risk assessment and BRCA mutation testing for breast and ovarian cancer susceptibility: systematic evidence review for the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force. Ann Intern Med. 2005 Sep 06; 143(5):362-79.
Score: 0.019
-
Screening for domestic violence--bridging the evidence gaps. Lancet. 2004 Dec; 364 Suppl 1:s22-3.
Score: 0.018
-
Cancer Survivorship Care in the United States at Facilities Accredited by the Commission on Cancer. JAMA Netw Open. 2024 Jul 01; 7(7):e2418736.
Score: 0.017
-
Commonly used types of postmenopausal estrogen for treatment of hot flashes: scientific review. JAMA. 2004 Apr 07; 291(13):1610-20.
Score: 0.017
-
Postmenopausal estrogen for treatment of hot flashes: clinical applications. JAMA. 2004 Apr 07; 291(13):1621-5.
Score: 0.017
-
Postpartum Breast Cancer and Survival in Women With Germline BRCA Pathogenic Variants. JAMA Netw Open. 2024 Apr 01; 7(4):e247421.
Score: 0.017
-
Screening women and elderly adults for family and intimate partner violence: a review of the evidence for the U. S. Preventive Services Task Force. Ann Intern Med. 2004 Mar 02; 140(5):387-96.
Score: 0.017
-
Are we overtreating rectal cancer: time for another trial? Ann Surg Oncol. 2004 Feb; 11(2):124-6.
Score: 0.017
-
Alterations in Cancer Treatment During the First Year of the COVID-19 Pandemic in the US. JAMA Netw Open. 2023 10 02; 6(10):e2340148.
Score: 0.016
-
Postmenopausal osteoporosis and estrogen. Am Fam Physician. 2003 Aug 15; 68(4):606, 610, 612.
Score: 0.016
-
Update in women's health. Ann Intern Med. 2003 Jan 21; 138(2):119-27.
Score: 0.015
-
Osteoporosis and fractures in postmenopausal women using estrogen. Arch Intern Med. 2002 Nov 11; 162(20):2278-84.
Score: 0.015
-
Evaluation of a National Quality Improvement Collaborative for Improving Cancer Screening. JAMA Netw Open. 2022 11 01; 5(11):e2242354.
Score: 0.015
-
Screening for postmenopausal osteoporosis: a review of the evidence for the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force. Ann Intern Med. 2002 Sep 17; 137(6):529-41.
Score: 0.015
-
How Well Is Surgical Improvement Being Conducted? Evaluation of 50 Local Surgery-Related Improvement Efforts. J Am Coll Surg. 2022 10 01; 235(4):573-580.
Score: 0.015
-
Postmenopausal hormone replacement therapy: scientific review. JAMA. 2002 Aug 21; 288(7):872-81.
Score: 0.015
-
Assessing benefits and harms of hormone replacement therapy: clinical applications. JAMA. 2002 Aug 21; 288(7):882-4.
Score: 0.015
-
Preventing Obesity in Midlife Women: A Systematic Review for the Women's Preventive Services Initiative. Ann Intern Med. 2022 09; 175(9):1275-1284.
Score: 0.015
-
Preventing Obesity in Midlife Women: A Recommendation From the Women's Preventive Services Initiative. Ann Intern Med. 2022 09; 175(9):1305-1309.
Score: 0.015
-
Postmenopausal estrogen replacement and risk for venous thromboembolism: a systematic review and meta-analysis for the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force. Ann Intern Med. 2002 May 07; 136(9):680-90.
Score: 0.015
-
Screening for Chlamydial and Gonococcal Infections: Updated Evidence Report and Systematic Review for the US Preventive Services Task Force. JAMA. 2021 09 14; 326(10):957-966.
Score: 0.014
-
Association of Second-Opinion Strategies in the Histopathologic Diagnosis of Cutaneous Melanocytic Lesions With Diagnostic Accuracy and Population-Level Costs. JAMA Dermatol. 2021 Sep 01; 157(9):1102-1106.
Score: 0.014
-
Trends in Patient Volume by Hospital Type and the Association of These Trends With Time to Cancer Treatment Initiation. JAMA Netw Open. 2021 07 01; 4(7):e2115675.
Score: 0.014
-
Uptake of Breast Cancer Clinical Trials at Minority Serving Cancer Centers. Ann Surg Oncol. 2021 Sep; 28(9):4995-5004.
Score: 0.013
-
Association Between Surgical Technical Skill and Long-term Survival for Colon Cancer. JAMA Oncol. 2021 01 01; 7(1):127-129.
Score: 0.013
-
Screening for Anxiety in Adolescent and Adult Women: A Recommendation From the Women's Preventive Services Initiative. Ann Intern Med. 2020 07 07; 173(1):48-56.
Score: 0.013
-
Survival After Cancer Treatment at Top-Ranked US Cancer Hospitals vs Affiliates of Top-Ranked Cancer Hospitals. JAMA Netw Open. 2020 05 01; 3(5):e203942.
Score: 0.013
-
Recommendations for prioritization, treatment, and triage of breast cancer patients during the COVID-19 pandemic. the COVID-19 pandemic breast cancer consortium. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2020 Jun; 181(3):487-497.
Score: 0.013
-
Workload Differentiates Breast Surgical Procedures: NSM Associated with Higher Workload Demand than SSM. Ann Surg Oncol. 2020 May; 27(5):1318-1326.
Score: 0.013
-
Reproducibility, stability, and accuracy of microbial profiles by fecal sample collection method in three distinct populations. PLoS One. 2019; 14(11):e0224757.
Score: 0.012
-
Comparative Age-Based Prospective Multi-Institutional Observations of 12,367 Patients Enrolled to the American College of Surgeons Oncology Group (ACOSOG) Z901101 Trials (Alliance). Ann Surg Oncol. 2019 Dec; 26(13):4213-4221.
Score: 0.012
-
Assessment of Second-Opinion Strategies for Diagnoses of Cutaneous Melanocytic Lesions. JAMA Netw Open. 2019 10 02; 2(10):e1912597.
Score: 0.012
-
Women's Preventive Services Initiative's Well-Woman Chart: A Summary of Preventive Health Recommendations for Women. Obstet Gynecol. 2019 09; 134(3):465-469.
Score: 0.012
-
Short interpregnancy intervals and adverse perinatal outcomes in high-resource settings: An updated systematic review. Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol. 2019 01; 33(1):O25-O47.
Score: 0.012
-
Short interpregnancy intervals and adverse maternal outcomes in high-resource settings: An updated systematic review. Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol. 2019 01; 33(1):O48-O59.
Score: 0.011
-
Good practices for the design, analysis, and interpretation of observational studies on birth spacing and perinatal health outcomes. Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol. 2019 01; 33(1):O15-O24.
Score: 0.011
-
Report of the Office of Population Affairs' expert work group meeting on short birth spacing and adverse pregnancy outcomes: Methodological quality of existing studies and future directions for research. Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol. 2019 01; 33(1):O5-O14.
Score: 0.011
-
Accuracy of Digital Pathologic Analysis vs Traditional Microscopy in the Interpretation of Melanocytic Lesions. JAMA Dermatol. 2018 10 01; 154(10):1159-1166.
Score: 0.011
-
Malpractice Concerns, Defensive Medicine, and the Histopathology Diagnosis of Melanocytic Skin Lesions. Am J Clin Pathol. 2018 Aug 30; 150(4):338-345.
Score: 0.011
-
Screening for Urinary Incontinence in Women: A Recommendation From the Women's Preventive Services Initiative. Ann Intern Med. 2018 09 04; 169(5):320-328.
Score: 0.011
-
Characteristics and diagnostic performance of pathologists who enjoy interpreting melanocytic lesions. Dermatol Online J. 2018 Jun 15; 24(6).
Score: 0.011
-
Concordance and Reproducibility of Melanoma Staging According to the 7th vs 8th Edition of the AJCC Cancer Staging Manual. JAMA Netw Open. 2018 05; 1(1).
Score: 0.011
-
Synthesis of multi-omic data and community metabolic models reveals insights into the role of hydrogen sulfide in colon cancer. Methods. 2018 10 01; 149:59-68.
Score: 0.011
-
Pathologist characteristics associated with accuracy and reproducibility of melanocytic skin lesion interpretation. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2018 Jul; 79(1):52-59.e5.
Score: 0.011
-
Pathologists' Use of Second Opinions in Interpretation of Melanocytic Cutaneous Lesions: Policies, Practices, and Perceptions. Dermatol Surg. 2018 Feb; 44(2):177-185.
Score: 0.011
-
Second opinion strategies in breast pathology: a decision analysis addressing over-treatment, under-treatment, and care costs. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2018 01; 167(1):195-203.
Score: 0.011
-
Pathologists' diagnosis of invasive melanoma and melanocytic proliferations: observer accuracy and reproducibility study. BMJ. 2017 Jun 28; 357:j2813.
Score: 0.011
-
Molecular epidemiology of Staphylococcus aureus bacteremia in a single large Minnesota medical center in 2015 as assessed using MLST, core genome MLST and spa typing. PLoS One. 2017; 12(6):e0179003.
Score: 0.010
-
The diagnostic challenge of low-grade ductal carcinoma in situ. Eur J Cancer. 2017 07; 80:39-47.
Score: 0.010
-
Surgical implications and variability in the use of the flat epithelial atypia diagnosis on breast biopsy specimens. Breast. 2017 Aug; 34:34-43.
Score: 0.010
-
Characteristics associated with requests by pathologists for second opinions on breast biopsies. J Clin Pathol. 2017 Nov; 70(11):947-953.
Score: 0.010
-
Outcomes of Primary Colorectal Sarcoma: A National Cancer Data Base (NCDB) Review. J Gastrointest Surg. 2017 03; 21(3):560-568.
Score: 0.010
-
Diagnostic Reproducibility: What Happens When the Same Pathologist Interprets the Same Breast Biopsy Specimen at Two Points in Time? Ann Surg Oncol. 2017 May; 24(5):1234-1241.
Score: 0.010
-
The influence of tumor regression, solar elastosis, and patient age on pathologists' interpretation of melanocytic skin lesions. Lab Invest. 2017 02; 97(2):187-193.
Score: 0.010
-
Evaluation of 12 strategies for obtaining second opinions to improve interpretation of breast histopathology: simulation study. BMJ. 2016 Jun 22; 353:i3069.
Score: 0.010
-
Use of Digital Whole Slide Imaging in Dermatopathology. J Digit Imaging. 2016 Apr; 29(2):243-53.
Score: 0.010
-
The Influence of Disease Severity of Preceding Clinical Cases on Pathologists' Medical Decision Making. Med Decis Making. 2017 01; 37(1):91-100.
Score: 0.010
-
Variability in Pathologists' Interpretations of Individual Breast Biopsy Slides: A Population Perspective. Ann Intern Med. 2016 05 17; 164(10):649-55.
Score: 0.010
-
Medical malpractice concerns and defensive medicine: a nationwide survey of breast pathologists. Am J Clin Pathol. 2015 Dec; 144(6):916-22.
Score: 0.009
-
How concerns and experiences with medical malpractice affect dermatopathologists' perceptions of their diagnostic practices when interpreting cutaneous melanocytic lesions. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2016 Feb; 74(2):317-24; quiz 324.e1-8.
Score: 0.009
-
Diagnostic concordance among pathologists interpreting breast biopsy specimens. JAMA. 2015 Mar 17; 313(11):1122-32.
Score: 0.009
-
Trends in breast biopsy pathology diagnoses among women undergoing mammography in the United States: a report from the Breast Cancer Surveillance Consortium. Cancer. 2015 May 01; 121(9):1369-78.
Score: 0.009
-
Comparative effectiveness of imaging modalities to determine metastatic breast cancer treatment response. Breast. 2015 Feb; 24(1):3-11.
Score: 0.009
-
Models in the development of clinical practice guidelines. Ann Intern Med. 2014 Dec 02; 161(11):812-8.
Score: 0.009
-
Digitized whole slides for breast pathology interpretation: current practices and perceptions. J Digit Imaging. 2014 Oct; 27(5):642-8.
Score: 0.009
-
Second opinion in breast pathology: policy, practice and perception. J Clin Pathol. 2014 Nov; 67(11):955-60.
Score: 0.009
-
A framework for evaluating diagnostic discordance in pathology discovered during research studies. Arch Pathol Lab Med. 2014 Jul; 138(7):955-61.
Score: 0.009
-
Modification of breast cancer risk according to age and menopausal status: a combined analysis of five population-based case-control studies. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2014 May; 145(1):165-75.
Score: 0.008
-
Sentinel lymph node surgery after neoadjuvant chemotherapy in patients with node-positive breast cancer: the ACOSOG Z1071 (Alliance) clinical trial. JAMA. 2013 Oct 09; 310(14):1455-61.
Score: 0.008
-
Development of a diagnostic test set to assess agreement in breast pathology: practical application of the Guidelines for Reporting Reliability and Agreement Studies (GRRAS). BMC Womens Health. 2013 Feb 05; 13:3.
Score: 0.008
-
Surgical menopause and nonvertebral fracture risk among older US women. Menopause. 2012 May; 19(5):510-6.
Score: 0.007
-
Tipping the balance of benefits and harms to favor screening mammography starting at age 40 years: a comparative modeling study of risk. Ann Intern Med. 2012 May 01; 156(9):609-17.
Score: 0.007
-
Features associated with successful recruitment of diverse patients onto cancer clinical trials: report from the American College of Surgeons Oncology Group. Ann Surg Oncol. 2011 Dec; 18(13):3544-50.
Score: 0.007
-
Long-term follow-up and individual item analysis of quality of life assessments related to laparoscopic-assisted colectomy in the COST trial 93-46-53 (INT 0146). Ann Surg Oncol. 2011 Sep; 18(9):2422-31.
Score: 0.007
-
Cancer registries: a novel alternative to long-term clinical trial follow-up based on results of a comparative study. Clin Trials. 2010 Dec; 7(6):686-95.
Score: 0.007
-
A discrete event simulation model to evaluate operational performance of a colonoscopy suite. Med Decis Making. 2010 May-Jun; 30(3):380-7.
Score: 0.006
-
Laparoscopic-assisted vs. open colectomy for cancer: comparison of short-term outcomes from 121 hospitals. J Gastrointest Surg. 2008 Nov; 12(11):2001-9.
Score: 0.006
-
USPSTF recommendations for STI screening. Am Fam Physician. 2008 Mar 15; 77(6):819-24.
Score: 0.006
-
National Institutes of Health state-of-the-science conference statement: prevention of fecal and urinary incontinence in adults. Ann Intern Med. 2008 Mar 18; 148(6):449-58.
Score: 0.005
-
Laparoscopically assisted vs open colectomy for colon cancer: a meta-analysis. Arch Surg. 2007 Mar; 142(3):298-303.
Score: 0.005
-
Local excision of rectal cancer revisited: ACOSOG protocol Z6041. Ann Surg Oncol. 2007 Feb; 14(2):271.
Score: 0.005
-
Is en-bloc resection of locally recurrent rectal carcinoma involving the urinary tract indicated? Ann Surg Oncol. 2006 May; 13(5):740-4.
Score: 0.005
-
Use of the National Cancer Data Base to develop clinical trials accrual targets that are appropriate for minority ethnicity patients: a report from the American College of Surgeons Oncology Group (ACOSOG) Special Population Committee. Cancer. 2006 Jan 01; 106(1):188-95.
Score: 0.005
-
Economic comparison of diagnostic approaches for evaluating osteoporosis in older women. Osteoporos Int. 2006 Jan; 17(1):68-76.
Score: 0.005
-
Screening children for family violence: a review of the evidence for the US Preventive Services Task Force. Ann Fam Med. 2004 Mar-Apr; 2(2):161-9.
Score: 0.004
-
The Mayo Clinic experience with multimodality treatment of locally advanced or recurrent colon cancer. Ann Surg Oncol. 2002 Mar; 9(2):177-85.
Score: 0.004
-
Short-term quality-of-life outcomes following laparoscopic-assisted colectomy vs open colectomy for colon cancer: a randomized trial. JAMA. 2002 Jan 16; 287(3):321-8.
Score: 0.004