Header Logo

Connection

Heidi Nelson to Aged

This is a "connection" page, showing publications Heidi Nelson has written about Aged.
Connection Strength

1.053
  1. Use of an Online Breast Cancer Risk Assessment and Patient Decision Aid in Primary Care Practices. J Womens Health (Larchmt). 2020 06; 29(6):763-769.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.084
  2. Incident Cases Captured in the National Cancer Database Compared with Those in U.S. Population Based Central Cancer Registries in 2012-2014. Ann Surg Oncol. 2019 Jun; 26(6):1604-1612.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.078
  3. Safety and Feasibility of Minimally Invasive Inguinal Lymph Node Dissection in Patients With Melanoma (SAFE-MILND): Report of a Prospective Multi-institutional Trial. Ann Surg. 2017 01; 265(1):192-196.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.067
  4. Effectiveness of Breast Cancer Screening: Systematic Review and Meta-analysis to Update the 2009 U.S. Preventive Services Task Force Recommendation. Ann Intern Med. 2016 Feb 16; 164(4):244-55.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.063
  5. Harms of Breast Cancer Screening: Systematic Review to Update the 2009 U.S. Preventive Services Task Force Recommendation. Ann Intern Med. 2016 Feb 16; 164(4):256-67.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.063
  6. Factors Associated With Rates of False-Positive and False-Negative Results From Digital Mammography Screening: An Analysis of Registry Data. Ann Intern Med. 2016 Feb 16; 164(4):226-35.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.063
  7. Mammography Screening in a Large Health System Following the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force Recommendations and the Affordable Care Act. PLoS One. 2015; 10(6):e0131903.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.060
  8. Screening for breast cancer: an update for the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force. Ann Intern Med. 2009 Nov 17; 151(10):727-37, W237-42.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.041
  9. Screening women and elderly adults for family and intimate partner violence: a review of the evidence for the U. S. Preventive Services Task Force. Ann Intern Med. 2004 Mar 02; 140(5):387-96.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.028
  10. Alterations in Cancer Treatment During the First Year of the COVID-19 Pandemic in the US. JAMA Netw Open. 2023 10 02; 6(10):e2340148.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.027
  11. Osteoporosis and fractures in postmenopausal women using estrogen. Arch Intern Med. 2002 Nov 11; 162(20):2278-84.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.025
  12. Screening for postmenopausal osteoporosis: a review of the evidence for the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force. Ann Intern Med. 2002 Sep 17; 137(6):529-41.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.025
  13. Assessing benefits and harms of hormone replacement therapy: clinical applications. JAMA. 2002 Aug 21; 288(7):882-4.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.025
  14. Trends in Patient Volume by Hospital Type and the Association of These Trends With Time to Cancer Treatment Initiation. JAMA Netw Open. 2021 07 01; 4(7):e2115675.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.023
  15. Survival After Cancer Treatment at Top-Ranked US Cancer Hospitals vs Affiliates of Top-Ranked Cancer Hospitals. JAMA Netw Open. 2020 05 01; 3(5):e203942.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.021
  16. Workload Differentiates Breast Surgical Procedures: NSM Associated with Higher Workload Demand than SSM. Ann Surg Oncol. 2020 May; 27(5):1318-1326.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.021
  17. Comparative Age-Based Prospective Multi-Institutional Observations of 12,367 Patients Enrolled to the American College of Surgeons Oncology Group (ACOSOG) Z901101 Trials (Alliance). Ann Surg Oncol. 2019 Dec; 26(13):4213-4221.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.020
  18. Assessment of Second-Opinion Strategies for Diagnoses of Cutaneous Melanocytic Lesions. JAMA Netw Open. 2019 10 02; 2(10):e1912597.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.020
  19. Women's Preventive Services Initiative's Well-Woman Chart: A Summary of Preventive Health Recommendations for Women. Obstet Gynecol. 2019 09; 134(3):465-469.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.020
  20. Malpractice Concerns, Defensive Medicine, and the Histopathology Diagnosis of Melanocytic Skin Lesions. Am J Clin Pathol. 2018 Aug 30; 150(4):338-345.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.019
  21. Synthesis of multi-omic data and community metabolic models reveals insights into the role of hydrogen sulfide in colon cancer. Methods. 2018 10 01; 149:59-68.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.018
  22. Molecular epidemiology of Staphylococcus aureus bacteremia in a single large Minnesota medical center in 2015 as assessed using MLST, core genome MLST and spa typing. PLoS One. 2017; 12(6):e0179003.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.017
  23. The diagnostic challenge of low-grade ductal carcinoma in situ. Eur J Cancer. 2017 07; 80:39-47.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.017
  24. Characteristics associated with requests by pathologists for second opinions on breast biopsies. J Clin Pathol. 2017 Nov; 70(11):947-953.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.017
  25. Outcomes of Primary Colorectal Sarcoma: A National Cancer Data Base (NCDB) Review. J Gastrointest Surg. 2017 03; 21(3):560-568.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.017
  26. The influence of tumor regression, solar elastosis, and patient age on pathologists' interpretation of melanocytic skin lesions. Lab Invest. 2017 02; 97(2):187-193.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.017
  27. How concerns and experiences with medical malpractice affect dermatopathologists' perceptions of their diagnostic practices when interpreting cutaneous melanocytic lesions. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2016 Feb; 74(2):317-24; quiz 324.e1-8.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.015
  28. Trends in breast biopsy pathology diagnoses among women undergoing mammography in the United States: a report from the Breast Cancer Surveillance Consortium. Cancer. 2015 May 01; 121(9):1369-78.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.015
  29. Comparative effectiveness of imaging modalities to determine metastatic breast cancer treatment response. Breast. 2015 Feb; 24(1):3-11.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.015
  30. A framework for evaluating diagnostic discordance in pathology discovered during research studies. Arch Pathol Lab Med. 2014 Jul; 138(7):955-61.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.014
  31. Modification of breast cancer risk according to age and menopausal status: a combined analysis of five population-based case-control studies. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2014 May; 145(1):165-75.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.014
  32. Sentinel lymph node surgery after neoadjuvant chemotherapy in patients with node-positive breast cancer: the ACOSOG Z1071 (Alliance) clinical trial. JAMA. 2013 Oct 09; 310(14):1455-61.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.013
  33. Surgical menopause and nonvertebral fracture risk among older US women. Menopause. 2012 May; 19(5):510-6.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.012
  34. Tipping the balance of benefits and harms to favor screening mammography starting at age 40 years: a comparative modeling study of risk. Ann Intern Med. 2012 May 01; 156(9):609-17.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.012
  35. Long-term follow-up and individual item analysis of quality of life assessments related to laparoscopic-assisted colectomy in the COST trial 93-46-53 (INT 0146). Ann Surg Oncol. 2011 Sep; 18(9):2422-31.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.011
  36. Laparoscopic-assisted vs. open colectomy for cancer: comparison of short-term outcomes from 121 hospitals. J Gastrointest Surg. 2008 Nov; 12(11):2001-9.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.009
  37. Is en-bloc resection of locally recurrent rectal carcinoma involving the urinary tract indicated? Ann Surg Oncol. 2006 May; 13(5):740-4.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.008
  38. Economic comparison of diagnostic approaches for evaluating osteoporosis in older women. Osteoporos Int. 2006 Jan; 17(1):68-76.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.007
  39. The Mayo Clinic experience with multimodality treatment of locally advanced or recurrent colon cancer. Ann Surg Oncol. 2002 Mar; 9(2):177-85.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.006
  40. Short-term quality-of-life outcomes following laparoscopic-assisted colectomy vs open colectomy for colon cancer: a randomized trial. JAMA. 2002 Jan 16; 287(3):321-8.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.006

© 2024 Kaiser Permanente