Header Logo

Connection

Deborah Cohen to Motor Activity

This is a "connection" page, showing publications Deborah Cohen has written about Motor Activity.
Connection Strength

7.646
  1. Park Use and Park-Based Physical Activity in Low-Income Neighborhoods. J Aging Phys Act. 2019 06 01; 27(3):334-342.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.576
  2. Promotoras as data collectors in a large study of physical activity in parks. Health Promot Pract. 2015 May; 16(3):354-61.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.443
  3. School-based program options to promote physical activity: a response. Prev Med. 2015 Mar; 72:133-4.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.441
  4. How can schools help youth increase physical activity? An economic analysis comparing school-based programs. Prev Med. 2014 Dec; 69 Suppl 1:S55-60.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.434
  5. Impact of park renovations on park use and park-based physical activity. J Phys Act Health. 2015 Feb; 12(2):289-95.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.424
  6. The potential for pocket parks to increase physical activity. Am J Health Promot. 2014 Jan-Feb; 28(3 Suppl):S19-26.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.410
  7. Energy balance in adolescent girls: the trial of activity for adolescent girls cohort. Obesity (Silver Spring). 2014 Mar; 22(3):772-80.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.409
  8. Assessing the contribution of parks to physical activity using global positioning system and accelerometry. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2013 Oct; 45(10):1981-7.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.403
  9. Use of neighbourhood parks: does socio-economic status matter? A four-city study. Public Health. 2013 Apr; 127(4):325-32.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.388
  10. Neighborhood poverty, park use, and park-based physical activity in a Southern California city. Soc Sci Med. 2012 Dec; 75(12):2317-25.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.375
  11. How much observation is enough? Refining the administration of SOPARC. J Phys Act Health. 2011 Nov; 8(8):1117-23.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.353
  12. Examination of perceived neighborhood characteristics and transportation on changes in physical activity and sedentary behavior: The Trial of Activity in Adolescent Girls. Health Place. 2010 Sep; 16(5):977-85.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.321
  13. Unusually high levels of physical activity in North Carolina. Prev Med. 2010 Aug; 51(2):188; author reply 189-90.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.315
  14. Not enough fruit and vegetables or too many cookies, candies, salty snacks, and soft drinks? Public Health Rep. 2010 Jan-Feb; 125(1):88-95.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.311
  15. Parks and physical activity: why are some parks used more than others? Prev Med. 2010 Jan; 50 Suppl 1:S9-12.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.307
  16. New recreational facilities for the young and the old in Los Angeles: policy and programming implications. J Public Health Policy. 2009; 30 Suppl 1:S248-63.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.290
  17. Public parks and physical activity among adolescent girls. Pediatrics. 2006 Nov; 118(5):e1381-9.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.250
  18. Renovations of neighbourhood parks: long-term outcomes on physical activity. J Epidemiol Community Health. 2019 03; 73(3):214-218.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.145
  19. Validation of a New Counter for Direct Observation of Physical Activity in Parks. J Phys Act Health. 2016 Feb; 13(2):140-4.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.113
  20. How much neighborhood parks contribute to local residents' physical activity in the City of Los Angeles: a meta-analysis. Prev Med. 2014 Dec; 69 Suppl 1:S106-10.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.108
  21. Physical activity surveillance in parks using direct observation. Prev Chronic Dis. 2014 Jan 02; 11:130147.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.103
  22. Partnerships for parks and physical activity. Am J Health Promot. 2014 Jan-Feb; 28(3 Suppl):S97-9.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.103
  23. Physical activity in parks: A randomized controlled trial using community engagement. Am J Prev Med. 2013 Nov; 45(5):590-7.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.101
  24. Quantifying the contribution of neighborhood parks to physical activity. Prev Med. 2013 Nov; 57(5):483-7.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.099
  25. Impact and cost-effectiveness of family Fitness Zones: a natural experiment in urban public parks. Health Place. 2012 Jan; 18(1):39-45.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.089
  26. Neighborhood socioeconomic status and non school physical activity and body mass index in adolescent girls. J Phys Act Health. 2009 Nov; 6(6):731-40.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.077
  27. Comparing perceived and objectively measured access to recreational facilities as predictors of physical activity in adolescent girls. J Urban Health. 2007 May; 84(3):346-59.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.065
  28. Girls' perception of neighborhood factors on physical activity, sedentary behavior, and BMI. Obesity (Silver Spring). 2007 Feb; 15(2):430-45.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.064
  29. Contribution of public parks to physical activity. Am J Public Health. 2007 Mar; 97(3):509-14.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.064
  30. Medical weight loss versus bariatric surgery: does method affect body composition and weight maintenance after 15% reduction in body weight? Nutrition. 2014 Jan; 30(1):49-54.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.026
  31. The effect of light rail transit on body mass index and physical activity. Am J Prev Med. 2010 Aug; 39(2):105-12.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.020
  32. Features of the Chronic Care Model (CCM) associated with behavioral counseling and diabetes care in community primary care. J Am Board Fam Med. 2010 May-Jun; 23(3):295-305.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.020

© 2024 Kaiser Permanente