William  Vollmer  to  Cost-Benefit Analysis
                            
                            
                                This is a "connection" page, showing publications  William  Vollmer  has written about  Cost-Benefit Analysis.
                            
                            
                            
                                
                                    
                                            
    
        
        
        
            Connection Strength
            
                
            
            0.309
         
        
        
     
 
    
        
        - 
            Improving Adherence to Cardiovascular Therapies: An Economic Evaluation of a Randomized Pragmatic Trial. Value Health. 2016 Mar-Apr; 19(2):176-84.
            
            
                Score: 0.118
            
         
        
        - 
            Design of the Prevention of Adult Caries Study (PACS): a randomized clinical trial assessing the effect of a chlorhexidine dental coating for the prevention of adult caries. BMC Oral Health. 2010 Oct 05; 10:23.
            
            
                Score: 0.082
            
         
        
        - 
            Costs and Cost-Effectiveness of Implementing a Digital Diabetes Prevention Program in a Large, Integrated Health System. Perm J. 2022 09 14; 26(3):74-82.
            
            
                Score: 0.047
            
         
        
        - 
            Strategies and Opportunities to STOP Colon Cancer in Priority Populations: design of a cluster-randomized pragmatic trial. Contemp Clin Trials. 2014 Jul; 38(2):344-9.
            
            
                Score: 0.026
            
         
        
        - 
            Case-finding options for COPD: results from the Burden of Obstructive Lung Disease study. Eur Respir J. 2013 Mar; 41(3):548-55.
            
            
                Score: 0.023
            
         
        
        - 
            The pharmacoepidemiology of COPD: recent advances and methodological discussion. Eur Respir J Suppl. 2003 Sep; 43:1s-44s.
            
            
                Score: 0.012