Julie Schmittdiel to Humans
This is a "connection" page, showing publications Julie Schmittdiel has written about Humans.
Connection Strength
2.452
-
Identifying Predictors of Homelessness Among Adults in a Large Integrated Health System in Northern California. Perm J. 2023 03 15; 27(1):56-71.
Score: 0.061
-
Incidence and Medical Hospitalization Rates of Patients With Pediatric Eating Disorders. Perm J. 2022 12 19; 26(4):56-61.
Score: 0.060
-
Address Changes Are Associated With Unmet Glycemic Targets: Opportunities to Improve Processes and Outcomes of Care Among People With Type 2 Diabetes. Perm J. 2022 06 29; 26(2):1-10.
Score: 0.058
-
Comment on Dunne et al. The Women's Leadership Gap in Diabetes: A Call for Equity and Excellence. Diabetes Care 2021;44:1734-1743. Diabetes Care. 2022 05 01; 45(5):e97-e98.
Score: 0.057
-
Prior Immunosuppressive Therapy and Severe Illness Among Patients Diagnosed with SARS-CoV-2: a Community-Based Study. J Gen Intern Med. 2021 12; 36(12):3794-3801.
Score: 0.055
-
Endometrial Cancer Detection During the Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) Pandemic. Obstet Gynecol. 2020 10; 136(4):842-843.
Score: 0.051
-
A Randomized Encouragement Trial to Increase Mail Order Pharmacy Use and Medication Adherence in Patients with Diabetes. J Gen Intern Med. 2021 01; 36(1):154-161.
Score: 0.051
-
Racial and Ethnic Disparities in Diabetes Care Quality among Women of Reproductive Age in an Integrated Delivery System. Womens Health Issues. 2020 May - Jun; 30(3):191-199.
Score: 0.050
-
Comorbid Diabetes and Severe Mental Illness: Outcomes in an Integrated Health Care Delivery System. J Gen Intern Med. 2020 01; 35(1):160-166.
Score: 0.048
-
Identifying Common Predictors of Multiple Adverse Outcomes Among Elderly Adults With Type-2 Diabetes. Med Care. 2019 09; 57(9):702-709.
Score: 0.048
-
Preventing Diabetes in High-Risk Patients: Time for a System-Level Approach to Disease Prevention. J Gen Intern Med. 2019 08; 34(8):1367-1368.
Score: 0.047
-
Opportunities to encourage mail order pharmacy delivery service use for diabetes prescriptions: a qualitative study. BMC Health Serv Res. 2019 Jun 25; 19(1):422.
Score: 0.047
-
The Effect of Age and Comorbidities on the Association Between the Medicare STAR Oral Antihyperglycemic Adherence Metric and Glycemic Control. J Manag Care Spec Pharm. 2018 Sep; 24(9):856-861.
Score: 0.045
-
Relationships between Medication Adherence and Cardiovascular Disease Risk Factor Control in Elderly Patients with Diabetes. Pharmacotherapy. 2017 Oct; 37(10):1204-1214.
Score: 0.042
-
Opportunities to Reduce Diabetes Risk in Women of Reproductive Age: Assessment and Treatment of Prediabetes within a Large Integrated Delivery System. Womens Health Issues. 2017 Nov - Dec; 27(6):666-672.
Score: 0.041
-
Population Health Management for Diabetes: Health Care System-Level Approaches for Improving Quality and Addressing Disparities. Curr Diab Rep. 2017 05; 17(5):31.
Score: 0.041
-
Improvements in access and care through the Affordable Care Act. Am J Manag Care. 2017 Mar 01; 23(3):e95-e97.
Score: 0.040
-
The impact of telephonic wellness coaching on weight loss: A "Natural Experiments for Translation in Diabetes (NEXT-D)" study. Obesity (Silver Spring). 2017 02; 25(2):352-356.
Score: 0.040
-
Telephone-Based Coaching. Am J Health Promot. 2017 03; 31(2):136-142.
Score: 0.039
-
Wellness Coaching for People With Prediabetes: A Randomized Encouragement Trial to Evaluate Outreach Methods at Kaiser Permanente, Northern California, 2013. Prev Chronic Dis. 2015 Nov 25; 12:E207.
Score: 0.037
-
Employer-Based Screening for Diabetes and Prediabetes in an Integrated Health Care Delivery System: A Natural Experiment for Translation in Diabetes (NEXT-D) Study. J Occup Environ Med. 2015 Nov; 57(11):1147-53.
Score: 0.037
-
Building a Career as a Delivery Science Researcher in a Changing Health Care Landscape. J Gen Intern Med. 2015 Jul; 30(7):880-2.
Score: 0.036
-
Health care system-level factors associated with performance on Medicare STAR adherence metrics in a large, integrated delivery system. Med Care. 2015 Apr; 53(4):332-7.
Score: 0.035
-
Methods for engaging stakeholders in comparative effectiveness research: a patient-centered approach to improving diabetes care. Healthc (Amst). 2015 Jun; 3(2):80-8.
Score: 0.035
-
Medicare Star excludes diabetes patients with poor CVD risk factor control. Am J Manag Care. 2014 Dec 01; 20(12):e573-81.
Score: 0.034
-
Impact of a pharmacy benefit change on new use of mail order pharmacy among diabetes patients: the Diabetes Study of Northern California (DISTANCE). Health Serv Res. 2015 Apr; 50(2):537-59.
Score: 0.034
-
Prescription medication burden in patients with newly diagnosed diabetes: a SUrveillance, PREvention, and ManagEment of Diabetes Mellitus (SUPREME-DM) study. J Am Pharm Assoc (2003). 2014 Jul-Aug; 54(4):374-82.
Score: 0.033
-
Initial persistence with antihypertensive therapies is associated with depression treatment persistence, but not depression. J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich). 2014 Jun; 16(6):412-7.
Score: 0.033
-
Novel use and utility of integrated electronic health records to assess rates of prediabetes recognition and treatment: brief report from an integrated electronic health records pilot study. Diabetes Care. 2014 Feb; 37(2):565-8.
Score: 0.032
-
Safety and effectiveness of mail order pharmacy use in diabetes. Am J Manag Care. 2013 Nov; 19(11):882-7.
Score: 0.032
-
Patient satisfaction and perceived success with a telephonic health coaching program: the Natural Experiments for Translation in Diabetes (NEXT-D) Study, Northern California, 2011. Prev Chronic Dis. 2013 Oct 31; 10:E179.
Score: 0.032
-
Health system factors and antihypertensive adherence in a racially and ethnically diverse cohort of new users. JAMA Intern Med. 2013 Jan 14; 173(1):54-61.
Score: 0.030
-
Health-plan and employer-based wellness programs to reduce diabetes risk: The Kaiser Permanente Northern California NEXT-D Study. Prev Chronic Dis. 2013; 10:E15.
Score: 0.030
-
The comparative effectiveness of mail order pharmacy use vs. local pharmacy use on LDL-C control in new statin users. J Gen Intern Med. 2011 Dec; 26(12):1396-402.
Score: 0.027
-
Missed opportunities in cardiovascular disease prevention?: low rates of hypertension recognition for women at medicine and obstetrics-gynecology clinics. Hypertension. 2011 Apr; 57(4):717-22.
Score: 0.026
-
Patient-provider communication regarding drug costs in Medicare Part D beneficiaries with diabetes: a TRIAD Study. BMC Health Serv Res. 2010 Jun 14; 10:164.
Score: 0.025
-
Developing a policy-relevant research agenda for the patient-centered medical home: a focus on outcomes. J Gen Intern Med. 2010 Jun; 25(6):593-600.
Score: 0.025
-
System-based participatory research in health care: an approach for sustainable translational research and quality improvement. Ann Fam Med. 2010 May-Jun; 8(3):256-9.
Score: 0.025
-
Patient race/ethnicity and patient-physician race/ethnicity concordance in the management of cardiovascular disease risk factors for patients with diabetes. Diabetes Care. 2010 Mar; 33(3):520-5.
Score: 0.024
-
The association of patient-physician gender concordance with cardiovascular disease risk factor control and treatment in diabetes. J Womens Health (Larchmt). 2009 Dec; 18(12):2065-70.
Score: 0.024
-
The effectiveness of diabetes care management in managed care. Am J Manag Care. 2009 May; 15(5):295-301.
Score: 0.023
-
Medicare Part D coverage gap and diabetes beneficiaries. Am J Manag Care. 2009 Mar; 15(3):189-93.
Score: 0.023
-
Why don't diabetes patients achieve recommended risk factor targets? Poor adherence versus lack of treatment intensification. J Gen Intern Med. 2008 May; 23(5):588-94.
Score: 0.022
-
Patient Assessment of Chronic Illness Care (PACIC) and improved patient-centered outcomes for chronic conditions. J Gen Intern Med. 2008 Jan; 23(1):77-80.
Score: 0.021
-
Predicted quality-adjusted life years as a composite measure of the clinical value of diabetes risk factor control. Med Care. 2007 Apr; 45(4):315-21.
Score: 0.020
-
Effect of primary health care orientation on chronic care management. Ann Fam Med. 2006 Mar-Apr; 4(2):117-23.
Score: 0.019
-
Brief report: The prevalence and use of chronic disease registries in physician organizations. A national survey. J Gen Intern Med. 2005 Sep; 20(9):855-8.
Score: 0.018
-
The use of patient and physician reminders for preventive services: results from a National Study of Physician Organizations. Prev Med. 2004 Nov; 39(5):1000-6.
Score: 0.017
-
Maternal hyperglycemia during pregnancy predicts adiposity of the offspring. Diabetes Care. 2014 Nov; 37(11):2996-3002.
Score: 0.017
-
Choice of a primary care physician and its relationship to adherence among patients with diabetes. Am J Manag Care. 2002 Sep; 8(9):777-84.
Score: 0.015
-
Association of Cardiovascular Outcomes and Mortality With Sustained Long-Acting Insulin Only vs Long-Acting Plus Short-Acting Insulin Treatment. JAMA Netw Open. 2021 09 01; 4(9):e2126605.
Score: 0.014
-
Incidence of 30-Day Venous Thromboembolism in Adults Tested for SARS-CoV-2 Infection in an Integrated Health Care System in Northern California. JAMA Intern Med. 2021 07 01; 181(7):997-1000.
Score: 0.014
-
Yoga for heart failure patients: a feasibility pilot study with a multiethnic population. Int J Yoga Therap. 2011; (21):77-83.
Score: 0.013
-
SARS-CoV-2 Clinical Outcomes in Patients with Cancer in a Large Integrated Health Care System in Northern California. Oncologist. 2021 03; 26(3):e500-e504.
Score: 0.013
-
Association of anticoagulation use with SARS-CoV2 detection. Thromb Res. 2021 02; 198:99-102.
Score: 0.013
-
Effect of physician and patient gender concordance on patient satisfaction and preventive care practices. J Gen Intern Med. 2000 Nov; 15(11):761-9.
Score: 0.013
-
Smoking cessation treatment for individuals with comorbid diabetes and serious mental illness in an integrated health care delivery system. Addict Behav. 2021 03; 114:106697.
Score: 0.013
-
Dietary factors and the risks of oesophageal adenocarcinoma and Barrett's oesophagus. Nutr Res Rev. 2010 Dec; 23(2):230-46.
Score: 0.013
-
Predictors of Hyperkalemia and Hypokalemia in Individuals with Diabetes: a Classification and Regression Tree Analysis. J Gen Intern Med. 2020 08; 35(8):2321-2328.
Score: 0.012
-
Comparison of Mortality and Major Cardiovascular Events Among Adults With Type 2 Diabetes Using Human vs Analogue Insulins. JAMA Netw Open. 2020 01 03; 3(1):e1918554.
Score: 0.012
-
Considerations for Identifying Social Needs in Health Care Systems: A Commentary on the Role of Predictive Models in Supporting a Comprehensive Social Needs Strategy. Med Care. 2019 09; 57(9):661-666.
Score: 0.012
-
Women's provider preferences for basic gynecology care in a large health maintenance organization. J Womens Health Gend Based Med. 1999 Jul-Aug; 8(6):825-33.
Score: 0.012
-
Effects of dietary fiber, fats, and meat intakes on the risk of Barrett's esophagus. Nutr Cancer. 2009; 61(5):607-16.
Score: 0.011
-
Cigarette smoking and the risk of Barrett's esophagus. Cancer Causes Control. 2009 Apr; 20(3):303-11.
Score: 0.011
-
The Relationship Between Prescription Copayments and Contraceptive Adherence in a New-user Cohort. Med Care. 2018 07; 56(7):577-582.
Score: 0.011
-
Choice of a personal physician and patient satisfaction in a health maintenance organization. JAMA. 1997 Nov 19; 278(19):1596-9.
Score: 0.011
-
Incidence of diabetes after a partner's diagnosis. Prev Med. 2017 Dec; 105:52-57.
Score: 0.010
-
Acceptance of lean redesigns in primary care: A contextual analysis. Health Care Manage Rev. 2017 Jul/Sep; 42(3):203-212.
Score: 0.010
-
A Two-Step Method to Identify Positive Deviant Physician Organizations of Accountable Care Organizations with Robust Performance Management Systems. Health Serv Res. 2018 06; 53(3):1851-1869.
Score: 0.010
-
The Implementation of Performance Management Systems in U.S. Physician Organizations. Med Care Res Rev. 2018 10; 75(5):562-585.
Score: 0.010
-
Shared decision making in contraceptive counseling. Contraception. 2017 May; 95(5):452-455.
Score: 0.010
-
Primary care visit preparation and communication for patients with poorly controlled diabetes: A qualitative study of patients and physicians. Prim Care Diabetes. 2017 04; 11(2):148-153.
Score: 0.010
-
Provider self-disclosure during contraceptive counseling. Contraception. 2017 Feb; 95(2):161-166.
Score: 0.010
-
A Case Study of the Impact of Data-Adaptive Versus Model-Based Estimation of the Propensity Scores on Causal Inferences from Three Inverse Probability Weighting Estimators. Int J Biostat. 2016 05 01; 12(1):131-55.
Score: 0.009
-
The Diabetes Telephone Study: Design and challenges of a pragmatic cluster randomized trial to improve diabetic peripheral neuropathy treatment. Clin Trials. 2016 06; 13(3):286-93.
Score: 0.009
-
Medication Adherence Does Not Explain Black-White Differences in Cardiometabolic Risk Factor Control among Insured Patients with Diabetes. J Gen Intern Med. 2016 Feb; 31(2):188-195.
Score: 0.009
-
Association of the quality of interpersonal care during family planning counseling with contraceptive use. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2016 07; 215(1):78.e1-9.
Score: 0.009
-
Pre-Visit Prioritization for complex patients with diabetes: Randomized trial design and implementation within an integrated health care system. Contemp Clin Trials. 2016 Mar; 47:196-201.
Score: 0.009
-
The Comparative Effectiveness of Diabetes Prevention Strategies to Reduce Postpartum Weight Retention in Women With Gestational Diabetes Mellitus: The Gestational Diabetes' Effects on Moms (GEM) Cluster Randomized Controlled Trial. Diabetes Care. 2016 Jan; 39(1):65-74.
Score: 0.009
-
Reach and Validity of an Objective Medication Adherence Measure Among Safety Net Health Plan Members with Diabetes: A Cross-Sectional Study. J Manag Care Spec Pharm. 2015 Aug; 21(8):688-98.
Score: 0.009
-
Evaluating diabetes health policies using natural experiments: the natural experiments for translation in diabetes study. Am J Prev Med. 2015 Jun; 48(6):747-54.
Score: 0.009
-
Changes in physical activity among adults with diabetes: a longitudinal cohort study of inactive patients with Type 2 diabetes who become physically active. Diabet Med. 2015 Aug; 32(8):1051-7.
Score: 0.009
-
Response to comment on O'Connor et al. Randomized trial of telephone outreach to improve medication adherence and metabolic control in adults with diabetes. Diabetes care 2014;37:3317-3324. Diabetes Care. 2015 Mar; 38(3):e46.
Score: 0.009
-
Determinants of adherence to diabetes medications: findings from a large pharmacy claims database. Diabetes Care. 2015 Apr; 38(4):604-9.
Score: 0.009
-
High-dimensional propensity score algorithm in comparative effectiveness research with time-varying interventions. Stat Med. 2015 Feb 28; 34(5):753-81.
Score: 0.009
-
Bringing patients' social context into the examination room: an investigation of the discussion of social influence during contraceptive counseling. Womens Health Issues. 2015 Jan-Feb; 25(1):13-21.
Score: 0.009
-
Randomized trial of telephone outreach to improve medication adherence and metabolic control in adults with diabetes. Diabetes Care. 2014 Dec; 37(12):3317-24.
Score: 0.009
-
Implications of different laboratory-based incident diabetic kidney disease definitions on comparative effectiveness studies. J Comp Eff Res. 2014 Jul; 3(4):359-69.
Score: 0.008
-
Intensification of antihyperglycemic therapy among patients with incident diabetes: a Surveillance Prevention and Management of Diabetes Mellitus (SUPREME-DM) study. Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2014 Jul; 23(7):699-710.
Score: 0.008
-
Targeted learning in real-world comparative effectiveness research with time-varying interventions. Stat Med. 2014 Jun 30; 33(14):2480-520.
Score: 0.008
-
A pragmatic cluster randomized clinical trial of diabetes prevention strategies for women with gestational diabetes: design and rationale of the Gestational Diabetes' Effects on Moms (GEM) study. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2014 Jan 15; 14:21.
Score: 0.008
-
Exercise as a vital sign: a quasi-experimental analysis of a health system intervention to collect patient-reported exercise levels. J Gen Intern Med. 2014 Feb; 29(2):341-8.
Score: 0.008
-
Initial antihyperglycemic drug therapy among 241 327 adults with newly identified diabetes from 2005 through 2010: a surveillance, prevention, and management of diabetes mellitus (SUPREME-DM) study. Ann Pharmacother. 2013 Oct; 47(10):1280-91.
Score: 0.008
-
Standardizing terminology and definitions of medication adherence and persistence in research employing electronic databases. Med Care. 2013 Aug; 51(8 Suppl 3):S11-21.
Score: 0.008
-
Characteristics of diabetic patients associated with achieving and maintaining blood pressure targets in the Adherence and Intensification of Medications program. Chronic Illn. 2014 Mar; 10(1):60-73.
Score: 0.008
-
Screening for impaired fasting glucose and diabetes using available health plan data. J Diabetes Complications. 2013 Nov-Dec; 27(6):580-7.
Score: 0.008
-
Detection and recognition of hypertension in anxious and depressed patients. J Hypertens. 2012 Dec; 30(12):2293-8.
Score: 0.007
-
Benefits of early hypertension control on cardiovascular outcomes in patients with diabetes. Diabetes Care. 2013 Feb; 36(2):322-7.
Score: 0.007
-
Improving treatment intensification to reduce cardiovascular disease risk: a cluster randomized trial. BMC Health Serv Res. 2012 Jul 02; 12:183.
Score: 0.007
-
The association between medication adherence and treatment intensification with blood pressure control in resistant hypertension. Hypertension. 2012 Aug; 60(2):303-9.
Score: 0.007
-
A comparison between antihypertensive medication adherence and treatment intensification as potential clinical performance measures. Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2012 May; 5(3):276-82.
Score: 0.007
-
Improving blood pressure control through a clinical pharmacist outreach program in patients with diabetes mellitus in 2 high-performing health systems: the adherence and intensification of medications cluster randomized, controlled pragmatic trial. Circulation. 2012 Jun 12; 125(23):2863-72.
Score: 0.007
-
Cost-effectiveness of a multicondition collaborative care intervention: a randomized controlled trial. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 2012 May; 69(5):506-14.
Score: 0.007
-
Age-dependent gender differences in hypertension management. J Hypertens. 2011 May; 29(5):1005-11.
Score: 0.007
-
Study protocol: the Adherence and Intensification of Medications (AIM) study--a cluster randomized controlled effectiveness study. Trials. 2010 Oct 12; 11:95.
Score: 0.006
-
Trends in time to confirmation and recognition of new-onset hypertension, 2002-2006. Hypertension. 2010 Oct; 56(4):605-11.
Score: 0.006
-
Primary non-adherence to prescribed medications. J Gen Intern Med. 2010 Aug; 25(8):763; author reply 765.
Score: 0.006
-
Adherence to cardiovascular disease medications: does patient-provider race/ethnicity and language concordance matter? J Gen Intern Med. 2010 Nov; 25(11):1172-7.
Score: 0.006
-
The impact of removing financial incentives from clinical quality indicators: longitudinal analysis of four Kaiser Permanente indicators. BMJ. 2010 May 11; 340:c1898.
Score: 0.006
-
Generic-only drug coverage in the Medicare Part D gap and effect on medication cost-cutting behaviors for patients with diabetes mellitus: the translating research into action for diabetes study. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2010 May; 58(5):822-8.
Score: 0.006
-
The predictors of patient-physician race and ethnic concordance: a medical facility fixed-effects approach. Health Serv Res. 2010 Jun; 45(3):792-805.
Score: 0.006
-
Entering and exiting the Medicare part D coverage gap: role of comorbidities and demographics. J Gen Intern Med. 2010 Jun; 25(6):568-74.
Score: 0.006
-
Physicians' perceptions of barriers to cardiovascular disease risk factor control among patients with diabetes: results from the translating research into action for diabetes (TRIAD) study. J Am Board Fam Med. 2010 Mar-Apr; 23(2):171-8.
Score: 0.006
-
Meaningful variation in performance: what does variation in quality tell us about improving quality? Med Care. 2010 Feb; 48(2):133-9.
Score: 0.006
-
Meaningful variation in performance: a systematic literature review. Med Care. 2010 Feb; 48(2):140-8.
Score: 0.006
-
Mail-order pharmacy use and adherence to diabetes-related medications. Am J Manag Care. 2010 Jan; 16(1):33-40.
Score: 0.006
-
Falling into the coverage gap: Part D drug costs and adherence for Medicare Advantage prescription drug plan beneficiaries with diabetes. Health Serv Res. 2010 Apr; 45(2):355-75.
Score: 0.006
-
The association of patient age with cardiovascular disease risk factor treatment and control in diabetes. J Gen Intern Med. 2009 Sep; 24(9):1049-52.
Score: 0.006
-
New prescription medication gaps: a comprehensive measure of adherence to new prescriptions. Health Serv Res. 2009 Oct; 44(5 Pt 1):1640-61.
Score: 0.006
-
Treatment intensification and risk factor control: toward more clinically relevant quality measures. Med Care. 2009 Apr; 47(4):395-402.
Score: 0.006
-
When more is not better: treatment intensification among hypertensive patients with poor medication adherence. Circulation. 2008 Jun 03; 117(22):2884-92.
Score: 0.005
-
Is patient activation associated with outcomes of care for adults with chronic conditions? J Ambul Care Manage. 2007 Jan-Mar; 30(1):21-9.
Score: 0.005
-
The routine use of health risk appraisals: results from a national study of physician organizations. Am J Health Promot. 2005 Sep-Oct; 20(1):34-8.
Score: 0.005
-
An empirical assessment of high-performing medical groups: results from a national study. Med Care Res Rev. 2005 Aug; 62(4):407-34.
Score: 0.004
-
Matching patients and practitioners based on beliefs about care: results of a randomized controlled trial. Am J Manag Care. 2004 Nov; 10(11 Pt 1):814-22.
Score: 0.004
-
Organizational factors affecting the adoption of diabetes care management processes in physician organizations. Diabetes Care. 2004 Oct; 27(10):2312-6.
Score: 0.004
-
Health promotion in physician organizations: results from a national study. Am J Prev Med. 2004 May; 26(4):259-64.
Score: 0.004
-
Patient choice. A randomized controlled trial of provider selection. J Gen Intern Med. 2003 May; 18(5):319-25.
Score: 0.004
-
External incentives, information technology, and organized processes to improve health care quality for patients with chronic diseases. JAMA. 2003 Jan 22-29; 289(4):434-41.
Score: 0.004
-
As good as it gets? Chronic care management in nine leading US physician organisations. BMJ. 2002 Oct 26; 325(7370):958-61.
Score: 0.004
-
Women in medicine: a four-nation comparison. J Am Med Womens Assoc (1972). 2002; 57(4):185-90.
Score: 0.004
-
Racial and ethnic differences in a patient survey: patients' values, ratings, and reports regarding physician primary care performance in a large health maintenance organization. Med Care. 2000 Mar; 38(3):300-10.
Score: 0.003
-
Quality of primary care practice in a large HMO according to physician specialty. Health Serv Res. 1999 Jun; 34(2):485-502.
Score: 0.003
-
Differences in resource use and costs of primary care in a large HMO according to physician specialty. Health Serv Res. 1999 Jun; 34(2):503-18.
Score: 0.003
-
A cost analysis of a Helicobacter pylori eradication strategy in a large health maintenance organization. Am J Gastroenterol. 1998 May; 93(5):743-7.
Score: 0.003
-
Costs of acid-related disorders to a health maintenance organization. Am J Med. 1997 Dec; 103(6):520-8.
Score: 0.003
-
The impact of aging and chronic disease on use of hospital and outpatient services in a large HMO: 1971-1991. J Am Geriatr Soc. 1997 Jun; 45(6):667-74.
Score: 0.003
-
Increased maternal age and the risk of fetal death. N Engl J Med. 1995 Oct 12; 333(15):953-7.
Score: 0.002