Header Logo

Connection

Julie Schmittdiel to Patient Satisfaction

This is a "connection" page, showing publications Julie Schmittdiel has written about Patient Satisfaction.
Connection Strength

0.816
  1. Effect of physician and patient gender concordance on patient satisfaction and preventive care practices. J Gen Intern Med. 2000 Nov; 15(11):761-9.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.168
  2. Choice of a personal physician and patient satisfaction in a health maintenance organization. JAMA. 1997 Nov 19; 278(19):1596-9.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.137
  3. Shared decision making in contraceptive counseling. Contraception. 2017 May; 95(5):452-455.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.129
  4. Patient satisfaction and perceived success with a telephonic health coaching program: the Natural Experiments for Translation in Diabetes (NEXT-D) Study, Northern California, 2011. Prev Chronic Dis. 2013 Oct 31; 10:E179.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.103
  5. Patient Assessment of Chronic Illness Care (PACIC) and improved patient-centered outcomes for chronic conditions. J Gen Intern Med. 2008 Jan; 23(1):77-80.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.068
  6. Matching patients and practitioners based on beliefs about care: results of a randomized controlled trial. Am J Manag Care. 2004 Nov; 10(11 Pt 1):814-22.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.055
  7. Racial and ethnic differences in a patient survey: patients' values, ratings, and reports regarding physician primary care performance in a large health maintenance organization. Med Care. 2000 Mar; 38(3):300-10.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.040
  8. Quality of primary care practice in a large HMO according to physician specialty. Health Serv Res. 1999 Jun; 34(2):485-502.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.038
  9. Provider self-disclosure during contraceptive counseling. Contraception. 2017 Feb; 95(2):161-166.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.031
  10. Meaningful variation in performance: what does variation in quality tell us about improving quality? Med Care. 2010 Feb; 48(2):133-9.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.020
  11. An empirical assessment of high-performing medical groups: results from a national study. Med Care Res Rev. 2005 Aug; 62(4):407-34.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.015
  12. Patient choice. A randomized controlled trial of provider selection. J Gen Intern Med. 2003 May; 18(5):319-25.
    View in: PubMed
    Score: 0.012

© 2024 Kaiser Permanente