Elizabeth McGlynn to Humans
This is a "connection" page, showing publications Elizabeth McGlynn has written about Humans.
Connection Strength
1.970
-
Comparing Kaiser Permanente Members to the General Population: Implications for Generalizability of Research. Perm J. 2023 06 15; 27(2):87-98.
Score: 0.062
-
The Kaiser Permanente Research Bank Cancer Cohort: a collaborative resource to improve cancer care and survivorship. BMC Cancer. 2022 Feb 25; 22(1):209.
Score: 0.057
-
Increasing Equity While Improving the Quality of Care: JACC Focus Seminar 9/9. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2021 12 21; 78(25):2599-2611.
Score: 0.056
-
Association Between Removal of a Warning Against Cephalosporin Use in Patients With Penicillin Allergy and Antibiotic Prescribing. JAMA Netw Open. 2021 04 01; 4(4):e218367.
Score: 0.053
-
Measuring and Improving Quality in the US: Where Are We Today? J Am Board Fam Med. 2020 Sep-Oct; 33(Suppl):S28-S35.
Score: 0.051
-
Improving the Quality of U.S. Health Care - What Will It Take? N Engl J Med. 2020 Aug 27; 383(9):801-803.
Score: 0.051
-
Return of Research-Related Genetic Test Results and Genetic Discrimination Concerns: Facilitators and Barriers of Genetic Research Participation in Diverse Groups. Public Health Genomics. 2020; 23(1-2):59-68.
Score: 0.050
-
Health Systems Have a Role in Preventing Firearm Injury. Pediatrics. 2019 08; 144(2).
Score: 0.047
-
Assessing the Safety of Direct-Acting Antiviral Agents for Hepatitis C. JAMA Netw Open. 2019 06 05; 2(6):e194765.
Score: 0.047
-
Is there a disconnect between what we do and what we should do? A survey of intensive care physicians and nurses in California. Intensive Care Med. 2018 07; 44(7):1180-1181.
Score: 0.043
-
Strategies For Assessing Delivery System Innovations. Health Aff (Millwood). 2017 03 01; 36(3):408-416.
Score: 0.040
-
Development and Testing of the Pediatric Respiratory Illness Measurement System (PRIMES) Quality Indicators. Hosp Pediatr. 2017 03; 7(3):125-133.
Score: 0.040
-
Measurement Is Essential for Improving Diagnosis and Reducing Diagnostic Error: A Report From the Institute of Medicine. JAMA. 2015 Dec 15; 314(23):2501-2.
Score: 0.037
-
Building Data Infrastructure to Evaluate and Improve Quality: PCORnet. J Oncol Pract. 2015 May; 11(3):204-6.
Score: 0.035
-
Perceptions of the appropriateness of care in California adult intensive care units. Crit Care. 2015 Feb 25; 19:51.
Score: 0.035
-
Reimagining quality measurement. N Engl J Med. 2014 Dec 04; 371(23):2150-3.
Score: 0.034
-
What makes a good quality measure? JAMA. 2014 Oct 15; 312(15):1517-8.
Score: 0.034
-
Developing a data infrastructure for a learning health system: the PORTAL network. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2014 Jul-Aug; 21(4):596-601.
Score: 0.033
-
Exploring public attitudes towards approaches to discussing costs in the clinical encounter. J Gen Intern Med. 2014 Jan; 29(1):223-9.
Score: 0.031
-
Variations in the quality of care delivered to patients undergoing total knee replacement at 3 affiliated hospitals. Orthopedics. 2011 May 18; 34(5):356.
Score: 0.027
-
Cost implications of improving blood pressure management among U.S. adults. Health Serv Res. 2011 Aug; 46(4):1124-57.
Score: 0.026
-
Electronic health record adoption and quality improvement in US hospitals. Am J Manag Care. 2010 Dec; 16(12 Suppl HIT):SP64-71.
Score: 0.026
-
Modeling health care policy alternatives. Health Serv Res. 2010 Oct; 45(5 Pt 2):1541-58.
Score: 0.025
-
Cost profiles: should the focus be on individual physicians or physician groups? Health Aff (Millwood). 2010 Aug; 29(8):1532-8.
Score: 0.025
-
The effect of different attribution rules on individual physician cost profiles. Ann Intern Med. 2010 May 18; 152(10):649-54.
Score: 0.025
-
Physician cost profiling--reliability and risk of misclassification. N Engl J Med. 2010 Mar 18; 362(11):1014-21.
Score: 0.025
-
Efficiency and its measurement: what practitioners need to know. Am J Manag Care. 2009 Nov; 15(11):842-5.
Score: 0.024
-
Comparing costs and quality of care at retail clinics with that of other medical settings for 3 common illnesses. Ann Intern Med. 2009 Sep 01; 151(5):321-8.
Score: 0.024
-
A systematic review of health care efficiency measures. Health Serv Res. 2009 Jun; 44(3):784-805.
Score: 0.023
-
Retail clinics, primary care physicians, and emergency departments: a comparison of patients' visits. Health Aff (Millwood). 2008 Sep-Oct; 27(5):1272-82.
Score: 0.022
-
Assessment of the scientific soundness of clinical performance measures: a field test of the National Committee for Quality Assurance's colorectal cancer screening measure. Arch Intern Med. 2008 Apr 28; 168(8):876-82.
Score: 0.022
-
The relationship between multimorbidity and patients' ratings of communication. J Gen Intern Med. 2008 Jun; 23(6):788-93.
Score: 0.022
-
The quality of ambulatory care delivered to children in the United States. N Engl J Med. 2007 Oct 11; 357(15):1515-23.
Score: 0.021
-
Intended and unintended consequences: what should we really worry about? Med Care. 2007 Jan; 45(1):3-5.
Score: 0.020
-
The quality of obstructive lung disease care for adults in the United States as measured by adherence to recommended processes. Chest. 2006 Dec; 130(6):1844-50.
Score: 0.020
-
The quality of pharmacologic care for adults in the United States. Med Care. 2006 Oct; 44(10):936-45.
Score: 0.020
-
Massachusetts health reform: beauty is in the eye of the beholder. Health Aff (Millwood). 2006 Nov-Dec; 25(6):w447-9.
Score: 0.019
-
Who is at greatest risk for receiving poor-quality health care? N Engl J Med. 2006 Mar 16; 354(11):1147-56.
Score: 0.019
-
Racial/ethnic variation in parent expectations for antibiotics: implications for public health campaigns. Pediatrics. 2004 May; 113(5):e385-94.
Score: 0.016
-
Improving women's quality of care for cardiovascular disease and diabetes: the feasibility and desirability of stratified reporting of objective performance measures. Womens Health Issues. 2003 Jul-Aug; 13(4):150-7.
Score: 0.016
-
The quality of health care delivered to adults in the United States. N Engl J Med. 2003 Jun 26; 348(26):2635-45.
Score: 0.016
-
Quality of health care for women: a demonstration of the quality assessment tools system. Med Care. 2003 May; 41(5):616-25.
Score: 0.015
-
Introduction and overview of the conceptual framework for a national quality measurement and reporting system. Med Care. 2003 Jan; 41(1 Suppl):I1-7.
Score: 0.015
-
An evidence-based national quality measurement and reporting system. Med Care. 2003 Jan; 41(1 Suppl):I8-15.
Score: 0.015
-
Establishing national goals for quality improvement. Med Care. 2003 Jan; 41(1 Suppl):I16-29.
Score: 0.015
-
Selecting common measures of quality and system performance. Med Care. 2003 Jan; 41(1 Suppl):I39-47.
Score: 0.015
-
Using performance measurement to drive improvement: a road map for change. Med Care. 2003 Jan; 41(1 Suppl):I48-60.
Score: 0.015
-
A research agenda to advance quality measurement and improvement. Med Care. 2003 Jan; 41(1 Suppl):I80-6.
Score: 0.015
-
An observational study of antibiotic prescribing behavior and the Hawthorne effect. Health Serv Res. 2002 Dec; 37(6):1603-23.
Score: 0.015
-
What cognitive science tells us about the design of reports for consumers. Med Care Res Rev. 2002 Mar; 59(1):3-35.
Score: 0.014
-
A new approach for measuring quality of care for women with hypertension. Arch Intern Med. 2001 May 28; 161(10):1329-35.
Score: 0.013
-
Keeping quality on the policy agenda. Health Aff (Millwood). 2001 May-Jun; 20(3):82-90.
Score: 0.013
-
Evaluating the quality of cancer care: development of cancer quality indicators for a global quality assessment tool. Cancer. 2000 Feb 01; 88(3):701-7.
Score: 0.012
-
Demographic differences in the utilization of clinical and direct-to-consumer genetic testing. J Genet Couns. 2020 08; 29(4):634-643.
Score: 0.012
-
New approach to assessing clinical quality of care for women: the QA Tool system. Womens Health Issues. 1999 Jul-Aug; 9(4):184-92.
Score: 0.012
-
Health and cost-benefits of chlamydia screening in young women. Sex Transm Dis. 1999 Jul; 26(6):309-16.
Score: 0.012
-
Quality of care for women: where are we now and where are we headed? Womens Health Issues. 1999 Mar-Apr; 9(2):65-80; discussion 93-106.
Score: 0.012
-
A Framework for Increasing Trust Between Patients and the Organizations That Care for Them. JAMA. 2019 Feb 12; 321(6):539-540.
Score: 0.011
-
Services to families of adults with schizophrenia: from treatment recommendations to dissemination. Psychiatr Serv. 1999 Feb; 50(2):233-8.
Score: 0.011
-
The outcomes utility index: will outcomes data tell us what we want to know? Int J Qual Health Care. 1998 Dec; 10(6):485-90.
Score: 0.011
-
Advancing the Science of Healthcare Service Delivery: The NHLBI Corporate Healthcare Leaders' Panel. Glob Heart. 2018 12; 13(4):339-345.
Score: 0.011
-
Improving the quality of healthcare for children: implementing the results of the AHSR research agenda conference. Health Serv Res. 1998 Oct; 33(4 Pt 2):955-76.
Score: 0.011
-
Overview of issues in improving quality of care for children. Health Serv Res. 1998 Oct; 33(4 Pt 2):977-1000.
Score: 0.011
-
Assessing the quality of healthcare provided to children. Health Serv Res. 1998 Oct; 33(4 Pt 2):1059-90.
Score: 0.011
-
Choosing and evaluating clinical performance measures. Jt Comm J Qual Improv. 1998 Sep; 24(9):470-9.
Score: 0.011
-
Quality of Care for Children With Medical Complexity: An Analysis of Continuity of Care as a Potential Quality Indicator. Acad Pediatr. 2018 08; 18(6):669-676.
Score: 0.011
-
Developing a clinical performance measure. Am J Prev Med. 1998 Apr; 14(3 Suppl):14-21.
Score: 0.011
-
Validation of New Care Coordination Quality Measures for Children with Medical Complexity. Acad Pediatr. 2018 07; 18(5):581-588.
Score: 0.011
-
The effect of managed care on primary care services for women. Womens Health Issues. 1998 Jan-Feb; 8(1):1-14; discussion 25-31.
Score: 0.011
-
Six challenges in measuring the quality of health care. Health Aff (Millwood). 1997 May-Jun; 16(3):7-21.
Score: 0.010
-
Development and Implementation of the Family Experiences With Coordination of Care Survey Quality Measures. Acad Pediatr. 2017 Nov - Dec; 17(8):863-870.
Score: 0.010
-
Fostering Transparency in Outcomes, Quality, Safety, and Costs. JAMA. 2016 Oct 25; 316(16):1661-1662.
Score: 0.010
-
Quality Measures to Assess Care Transitions for Hospitalized Children. Pediatrics. 2016 08; 138(2).
Score: 0.010
-
Setting the context for measuring patient outcomes. New Dir Ment Health Serv. 1996; (71):19-32.
Score: 0.009
-
Choosing chronic disease measures for HEDIS: conceptual framework and review of seven clinical areas. Manag Care Q. 1996; 4(3):54-77.
Score: 0.009
-
Quality assessment of reproductive health services. West J Med. 1995 Sep; 163(3 Suppl):19-27.
Score: 0.009
-
Assessing the quality of care for children. Prospects under health reform. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 1995 Apr; 149(4):359-68.
Score: 0.009
-
Comparison of the appropriateness of coronary angiography and coronary artery bypass graft surgery between Canada and New York State. JAMA. 1994 Sep 28; 272(12):934-40.
Score: 0.008
-
Using Medicaid and CHIP claims data to support pediatric quality measurement: lessons from 3 centers of excellence in measure development. Acad Pediatr. 2014 Sep-Oct; 14(5 Suppl):S76-81.
Score: 0.008
-
Characteristics of resistant hypertension in a large, ethnically diverse hypertension population of an integrated health system. Mayo Clin Proc. 2013 Oct; 88(10):1099-107.
Score: 0.008
-
Focus groups highlight that many patients object to clinicians' focusing on costs. Health Aff (Millwood). 2013 Feb; 32(2):338-46.
Score: 0.008
-
Comparative effectiveness topics from a large, integrated delivery system. Perm J. 2013; 17(4):4-13.
Score: 0.008
-
Physicians with the least experience have higher cost profiles than do physicians with the most experience. Health Aff (Millwood). 2012 Nov; 31(11):2453-63.
Score: 0.007
-
CareTrack: assessing the appropriateness of health care delivery in Australia. Med J Aust. 2012 Jul 16; 197(2):100-5.
Score: 0.007
-
Depression and medication adherence in the treatment of chronic diseases in the United States: a meta-analysis. J Gen Intern Med. 2011 Oct; 26(10):1175-82.
Score: 0.007
-
Cost implications to health care payers of improving glucose management among adults with type 2 diabetes. Health Serv Res. 2011 Aug; 46(4):1158-79.
Score: 0.007
-
The impact of health plan physician-tiering on access to care. J Gen Intern Med. 2011 Apr; 26(4):440-5.
Score: 0.007
-
Bending the curve through health reform implementation. Am J Manag Care. 2010 Nov; 16(11):804-12.
Score: 0.006
-
Associations between physician characteristics and quality of care. Arch Intern Med. 2010 Sep 13; 170(16):1442-9.
Score: 0.006
-
Incorporating statistical uncertainty in the use of physician cost profiles. BMC Health Serv Res. 2010 Mar 05; 10:57.
Score: 0.006
-
Why do patients seek care at retail clinics, and what alternatives did they consider? Am J Med Qual. 2010 Mar-Apr; 25(2):128-34.
Score: 0.006
-
Bending the curve: effective steps to address long-term healthcare spending growth. Am J Manag Care. 2009 Oct; 15(10):676-80.
Score: 0.006
-
Pew Memorial Trust policy synthesis: 5. State coverage for organ transplantation: a framework for decision making. Health Serv Res. 1988 Feb; 22(6):881-922.
Score: 0.005
-
Population-based assessments of ophthalmologic and audiologic follow-up in children with very low birth weight enrolled in Medicaid: a quality-of-care study. Pediatrics. 2008 Feb; 121(2):e278-85.
Score: 0.005
-
Quality-of-care research in mental health: responding to the challenge. Inquiry. 1988; 25(1):157-70.
Score: 0.005
-
Quality by any other name?: a comparison of three profiling systems for assessing health care quality. Health Serv Res. 2007 Oct; 42(5):2070-87.
Score: 0.005
-
Relationship between number of medical conditions and quality of care. N Engl J Med. 2007 Jun 14; 356(24):2496-504.
Score: 0.005
-
Quality-of-care indicators for the neurodevelopmental follow-up of very low birth weight children: results of an expert panel process. Pediatrics. 2006 Jun; 117(6):2080-92.
Score: 0.005
-
Clinical practice guidelines for older patients with comorbid diseases. JAMA. 2006 Jan 04; 295(1):34; author reply 34-5.
Score: 0.005
-
Patients' preferences for technical versus interpersonal quality when selecting a primary care physician. Health Serv Res. 2005 Aug; 40(4):957-77.
Score: 0.004
-
Quality of care for hypertension in the United States. BMC Cardiovasc Disord. 2005 Jan 07; 5(1):1.
Score: 0.004
-
How good is the quality of health care in the United States? 1998. Milbank Q. 2005; 83(4):843-95.
Score: 0.004
-
Comparison of quality of care for patients in the Veterans Health Administration and patients in a national sample. Ann Intern Med. 2004 Dec 21; 141(12):938-45.
Score: 0.004
-
Profiling the quality of care in twelve communities: results from the CQI study. Health Aff (Millwood). 2004 May-Jun; 23(3):247-56.
Score: 0.004
-
Paying for performance: Medicare should lead. Health Aff (Millwood). 2003 Nov-Dec; 22(6):8-10.
Score: 0.004
-
Can health care quality indicators be transferred between countries? Qual Saf Health Care. 2003 Feb; 12(1):8-12.
Score: 0.004
-
Parent expectations for antibiotics, physician-parent communication, and satisfaction. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2001 Jul; 155(7):800-6.
Score: 0.003
-
Outcome measurement in HEDIS: can risk adjustment save the low birth weight measure? Health Serv Res. 2000 Dec; 35(5 Pt 3):72-85.
Score: 0.003
-
Screening for chlamydia in adolescents and young women. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2000 Nov; 154(11):1108-13.
Score: 0.003
-
Impact of sociodemographic case mix on the HEDIS measures of health plan quality. Med Care. 2000 Oct; 38(10):981-92.
Score: 0.003
-
Defining and measuring quality of care: a perspective from US researchers. Int J Qual Health Care. 2000 Aug; 12(4):281-95.
Score: 0.003
-
Measuring antidepressant prescribing practice in a health care system using administrative data: implications for quality measurement and improvement. Jt Comm J Qual Improv. 2000 Apr; 26(4):203-16.
Score: 0.003
-
The relationship between perceived parental expectations and pediatrician antimicrobial prescribing behavior. Pediatrics. 1999 Apr; 103(4 Pt 1):711-8.
Score: 0.003
-
Assessing quality in managed care: health plan reporting of HEDIS performance measures. Policy Brief Commonw Fund. 1998 Sep; (298):1-6.
Score: 0.003
-
How good is the quality of health care in the United States? Milbank Q. 1998; 76(4):517-63, 509.
Score: 0.003
-
Development of a quality of care measurement system for children and adolescents. Methodological considerations and comparisons with a system for adult women. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 1997 Nov; 151(11):1085-92.
Score: 0.003
-
Quality of health care. Part 2: measuring quality of care. N Engl J Med. 1996 Sep 26; 335(13):966-70.
Score: 0.002
-
An experimental evaluation of residential and nonresidential treatment for dually diagnosed homeless adults. J Addict Dis. 1995; 14(4):111-34.
Score: 0.002
-
Switches between prepaid and fee-for-service health systems among depressed outpatients: results from the Medical Outcomes Study. Med Care. 1994 Sep; 32(9):917-29.
Score: 0.002
-
Coronary angiography and revascularization: defining procedural indications through formal group processes. The Canadian Revascularization Panel, the Canadian Coronary Angiography Panel. Can J Cardiol. 1994 Jan-Feb; 10(1):41-8.
Score: 0.002
-
The appropriateness of hysterectomy. A comparison of care in seven health plans. Health Maintenance Organization Quality of Care Consortium. JAMA. 1993 May 12; 269(18):2398-402.
Score: 0.002
-
Physicians' characteristics influence patients' adherence to medical treatment: results from the Medical Outcomes Study. Health Psychol. 1993 Mar; 12(2):93-102.
Score: 0.002
-
HMO vs fee-for-service care of older persons with acute myocardial infarction. Am J Public Health. 1992 Dec; 82(12):1626-30.
Score: 0.002
-
Choosing quality of care measures based on the expected impact of improved care on health. Health Serv Res. 1992 Dec; 27(5):619-50.
Score: 0.002
-
Functional status and well-being of patients with chronic conditions. Results from the Medical Outcomes Study. JAMA. 1989 Aug 18; 262(7):907-13.
Score: 0.001